These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36586861)

  • 1. Effects of acoustic nonlinearity on communication performance in soft tissues.
    Tabak G; Oelze ML; Singer AC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3583. PubMed ID: 36586861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of Temporal and Spatial Fluctuations of the Shallow Sea Acoustic Field on Underwater Acoustic Communication.
    Lv Z; Du L; Li H; Wang L; Qin J; Yang M; Ren C
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(15):. PubMed ID: 35957351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonlinear X-wave ultrasound imaging of acoustic biomolecules.
    Maresca D; Sawyer DP; Renaud G; Lee-Gosselin A; Shapiro MG
    Phys Rev X; 2018; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 34040818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single- and multi-channel underwater acoustic communication channel capacity: a computational study.
    Hayward TJ; Yang TC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1652. PubMed ID: 17927425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sweep-spread carrier for underwater communication over acoustic channels with strong multipath propagation.
    Kebkal KG; Bannasch R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Nov; 112(5 Pt 1):2043-52. PubMed ID: 12430816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Asynchronous Chirp Slope Keying for Underwater Acoustic Communication.
    Schott DJ; Gabbrielli A; Xiong W; Fischer G; Höflinger F; Wendeberg J; Schindelhauer C; Rupitsch SJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(9):. PubMed ID: 34068628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of acoustic emissions for underwater data transmission on the behaviour of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in a floating pen.
    Kastelein RA; Verboom WC; Muijsers M; Jennings NV; van der Heul S
    Mar Environ Res; 2005 May; 59(4):287-307. PubMed ID: 15589983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Source motion detection, estimation, and compensation for underwater acoustics inversion by wideband ambiguity lag-Doppler filtering.
    Josso NF; Ioana C; Mars JI; Gervaise C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3416-25. PubMed ID: 21218875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficient use of bandwidth for underwater acoustic communication.
    Song HC; Hodgkiss WS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):905-8. PubMed ID: 23927088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of ocean thermocline variability on noncoherent underwater acoustic communications.
    Siderius M; Porter MB; Hursky P; McDonald V;
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):1895-908. PubMed ID: 17471705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relating the performance of time-reversal-based underwater acoustic communications in different shallow water environments.
    Yang TC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):1995-2002. PubMed ID: 21973354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonlinear parameter estimation in water-saturated sandy sediment with difference frequency acoustic wave.
    Kim BN; Yoon SW
    Ultrasonics; 2009 May; 49(4-5):438-45. PubMed ID: 19138778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of Water Column Variations on Sound Propagation and Underwater Acoustic Communications.
    Siddiqui SI; Dong H
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 May; 19(9):. PubMed ID: 31067704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deer browsing alters sound propagation in temperate deciduous forests.
    Boycott TJ; Gao J; Gall MD
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211569. PubMed ID: 30759129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fast prediction of pulsed nonlinear acoustic fields from clinically relevant sources using time-averaged wave envelope approach: comparison of numerical simulations and experimental results.
    Wójcik J; Kujawska T; Nowicki A; Lewin PA
    Ultrasonics; 2008 Dec; 48(8):707-15. PubMed ID: 18474387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Signal Processing for Parametric Acoustic Sources Applied to Underwater Communication.
    Campo-Valera M; Felis-Enguix I; Villó-Pérez I
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Oct; 20(20):. PubMed ID: 33080846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental imaging of the acoustic nonlinearity parameter B/A for biological tissues via a parametric array.
    Zhang D; Gong XF; Chen X
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Oct; 27(10):1359-65. PubMed ID: 11731049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simple and effective noise whitening method for underwater acoustic orthogonal frequency division multiplexing.
    Berger CR; Chen W; Zhou S; Huang J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2358-67. PubMed ID: 20370018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of underwater data transmission sounds on the displacement behaviour of captive harbour seals (Phoca vitulina).
    Kastelein RA; van der Heul S; Verboom WC; Triesscheijn RJ; Jennings NV
    Mar Environ Res; 2006 Feb; 61(1):19-39. PubMed ID: 16038972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Underwater acoustic channel characteristics and communication performance at 85 kHz.
    Zhou Y; Song A; Tong F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):EL350. PubMed ID: 29092542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.