BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36586867)

  • 1. Frequency dependence of sensitivity to interaural phase differences in pure tones.
    Klug J; Dietz M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3130. PubMed ID: 36586867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability in Hearing Threshold Prediction in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Participants Using Mixed Multiple ASSR.
    Israelsson KE; Bogo R; Berninger E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 25751697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phase locking of auditory-nerve fibers to the envelopes of high-frequency sounds: implications for sound localization.
    Dreyer A; Delgutte B
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov; 96(5):2327-41. PubMed ID: 16807349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Hu N
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting hearing thresholds in occupational noise-induced hearing loss by auditory steady state responses.
    Attias J; Karawani H; Shemesh R; Nageris B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 24509531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Otitis media with effusion in children: Cross-frequency correlation in pure tone audiometry.
    Chow AHC; Cai T; McPherson B; Yang F
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221405. PubMed ID: 31437206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the existence in human auditory pathways of channels selectively tuned to the modulation present in frequency-modulated tones.
    Kay RH; Matthews DR
    J Physiol; 1972 Sep; 225(3):657-77. PubMed ID: 5076392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thresholds for short-latency auditory-evoked potentials to tones in notched noise in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Stapells DR; Picton TW; Durieux-Smith A; Edwards CG; Moran LM
    Audiology; 1990; 29(5):262-74. PubMed ID: 2275641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient across-frequency integration: evidence from psychometric functions.
    Hicks ML; Buus S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun; 107(6):3333-42. PubMed ID: 10875378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.
    Baldwin M; Watkin P
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of multi-channel auditory steady-state response in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Chen PR; Hsu CJ; Wu HP
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jan; 123(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 18452631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling interaural-delay sensitivity to frequency modulation at high frequencies.
    Saberi K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2551-64. PubMed ID: 9604349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relative role of beats and combination tones in determining the shapes of masking patterns: II. Hearing-impaired listeners.
    Alcántara JI; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2002 Mar; 165(1-2):103-16. PubMed ID: 12031520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison.
    Johnson TA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):559-76. PubMed ID: 16377993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrimination of interaural differences of level as a function of frequency.
    Yost WA; Dye RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 May; 83(5):1846-51. PubMed ID: 3403800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Behavioral thresholds for tones during infancy.
    Berg KM; Smith MC
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1983 Jun; 35(3):409-25. PubMed ID: 6864154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic echoplanar scanner noise and pure tone hearing thresholds: the effects of sequence repetition times and acoustic noise rates.
    Ulmer JL; Biswal BB; Mark LP; Mathews VP; Prost RW; Millen SJ; Garman JN; Horzewski D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(3):480-6. PubMed ID: 9606392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.