These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36586868)

  • 21. "Orthographic forms affect speech perception in a second language: Consonant and vowel length in L2 English": Correction to Bassetti et al. (2021).
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Jul; 48(7):742. PubMed ID: 35737560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Listeners retune phoneme categories across languages.
    Reinisch E; Weber A; Mitterer H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 22545600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bilingualism and Speech Understanding in Noise: Auditory and Linguistic Factors.
    Skoe E; Karayanidi K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):115-130. PubMed ID: 30461397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perception of intelligibility and qualities of non-native accented speakers.
    Fuse A; Navichkova Y; Alloggio K
    J Commun Disord; 2018; 71():37-51. PubMed ID: 29268109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. No matter how: Top-down effects of verbal and semantic category knowledge on early visual perception.
    Maier M; Abdel Rahman R
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 19(4):859-876. PubMed ID: 30607831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bilinguals Show Proportionally Greater Benefit From Visual Speech Cues and Sentence Context in Their Second Compared to Their First Language.
    Chauvin A; Phillips NA
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1316-1326. PubMed ID: 34966162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Listening effort during speech perception enhances auditory and lexical processing for non-native listeners and accents.
    Song J; Iverson P
    Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():163-170. PubMed ID: 29957515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Categorical perception of speech by children with specific language impairments.
    Coady JA; Kluender KR; Evans JL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Aug; 48(4):944-59. PubMed ID: 16378484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Categorical perception of speech sounds in adults who stutter.
    Bakhtiar M; Shao J; Cheung MN; Zhang C
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2021 Jun; 35(6):560-576. PubMed ID: 32787467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. When processing costs impact predictive processing: The case of foreign-accented speech and accent experience.
    Porretta V; Buchanan L; Järvikivi J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1558-1565. PubMed ID: 31970710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Orthographic forms affect speech perception in a second language: Consonant and vowel length in L2 English.
    Bassetti B; Masterson J; Cerni T; Mairano P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Dec; 47(12):1583-1603. PubMed ID: 34881950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cross-linguistic Influences on Sentence Accent Detection in Background Noise.
    Scharenborg O; Kakouros S; Post B; Meunier F
    Lang Speech; 2020 Mar; 63(1):3-30. PubMed ID: 30606083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Grammatical processing of spoken language in child and adult language learners.
    Felser C; Clahsen H
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2009 Jun; 38(3):305-19. PubMed ID: 19337839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Idiosyncratic use of bottom-up and top-down information leads to differences in speech perception flexibility: Converging evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking.
    Kapnoula EC; McMurray B
    Brain Lang; 2021 Dec; 223():105031. PubMed ID: 34628259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of linguistic experience on the cognitive processing of pitch in speech and nonspeech sounds.
    Bent T; Bradlow AR; Wright BA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 16478329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cross-language perceptual similarity predicts categorial discrimination of American vowels by naïve Japanese listeners.
    Strange W; Hisagi M; Akahane-Yamada R; Kubo R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL226-31. PubMed ID: 21974496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dynamic Encoding of Acoustic Features in Neural Responses to Continuous Speech.
    Khalighinejad B; Cruzatto da Silva G; Mesgarani N
    J Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 37(8):2176-2185. PubMed ID: 28119400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development of the A§E test battery for assessment of pitch perception in speech.
    Heeren W; Coene M; Vaerenberg B; Avram A; Cardinaletti A; del Bo L; Pascu A; Volpato F; Govaerts PJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Nov; 13(4):206-19. PubMed ID: 22449360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.