These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36586870)

  • 41. Understanding native Russian listeners' errors on an English word recognition test: model-based analysis of phoneme confusion.
    Shi LF; Morozova N
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Aug; 51(8):597-605. PubMed ID: 22646080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sonority constraints on onset-rime cohesion: evidence from native and bilingual Filipino readers of English.
    Alonzo A; Taft M
    Brain Lang; 2002; 81(1-3):368-83. PubMed ID: 12081406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Enhancement of laryngeal contrasts in non-native English clear speech: a comparison between L2-immersed sequential bilinguals and L1-immersed speakers.
    Jung YJ; Dmitrieva O
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2024; 18():1413886. PubMed ID: 39345944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The clear speech effect for non-native listeners.
    Bradlow AR; Bent T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jul; 112(1):272-84. PubMed ID: 12141353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Relational timing in the production and perception of Japanese singleton and geminate stops.
    Idemaru K; Guion-Anderson S
    Phonetica; 2010; 67(1-2):25-46. PubMed ID: 20798568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Speaking rate normalization across different talkers in the perception of Japanese stop and vowel length contrasts.
    Kawahara S; Kato M; Idemaru K
    JASA Express Lett; 2022 Mar; 2(3):035204. PubMed ID: 36154627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Are Serbian and English listeners insensitive to lexical pitch accents in Serbian?
    Nikolić D; Winters S
    Phonetica; 2022 Aug; 79(4):397-423. PubMed ID: 36073964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Cross-language speech perception in adults: phonemic, phonetic, and acoustic contributions.
    Polka L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jun; 89(6):2961-77. PubMed ID: 1918634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Processing of Phonemic Consonant Length: Semantic and Fragment Priming Evidence from Bengali.
    Kotzor S; Wetterlin A; Roberts AC; Lahiri A
    Lang Speech; 2016 Mar; 59(Pt 1):83-112. PubMed ID: 27089807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Perception of Japanese singleton and geminate contrasts: A case of Chinese learners with different dialectal backgrounds.
    Ren H
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1070107. PubMed ID: 36570981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception.
    Werker JF; Tees RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jun; 75(6):1866-78. PubMed ID: 6747097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Speech sound development in typically developing 2-7-year-old Dutch-speaking children: A normative cross-sectional study.
    van Haaften L; Diepeveen S; van den Engel-Hoek L; de Swart B; Maassen B
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2020 Nov; 55(6):971-987. PubMed ID: 33111376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The perception of Arabic and Japanese short and long vowels by native speakers of Arabic, Japanese, and Persian.
    Tsukada K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):989-98. PubMed ID: 21361455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Dental-to-velar perceptual assimilation: a cross-linguistic study of the perception of dental stop+/l/ clusters.
    Hallé PA; Best CT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):2899-914. PubMed ID: 17550188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The differential effects of vowel and onset consonant lengthening on speech segmentation: Evidence from Taiwanese Southern Min.
    Ou SC; Guo ZC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Mar; 149(3):1866. PubMed ID: 33765826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Perception Abilities of L1 Cypriot Greek Listeners - Types of Errors Involving Plosive Consonants in L2 English.
    Kkese E; Petinou K
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Feb; 46(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 26965243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Perceptual consequences of native and non-native clear speech.
    Kato M; Baese-Berk MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Feb; 151(2):1246. PubMed ID: 35232086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Training English listeners to perceive phonemic length contrasts in Japanese.
    Tajima K; Kato H; Rothwell A; Akahane-Yamada R; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):397-413. PubMed ID: 18177169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cross-language perceptual similarity predicts categorial discrimination of American vowels by naïve Japanese listeners.
    Strange W; Hisagi M; Akahane-Yamada R; Kubo R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL226-31. PubMed ID: 21974496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.