These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36586964)

  • 1. Phonological effects on the perceptual weighting of voice cues for voice gender categorization.
    Jebens A; Başkent D; Rachman L
    JASA Express Lett; 2022 Dec; 2(12):125202. PubMed ID: 36586964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gender categorization is abnormal in cochlear implant users.
    Fuller CD; Gaudrain E; Clarke JN; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Free RH; Başkent D
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Dec; 15(6):1037-48. PubMed ID: 25172111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrimination of Voice Pitch and Vocal-Tract Length in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):226-237. PubMed ID: 28799983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of lexical content, acoustic and linguistic variability, and vocoding on voice cue perception.
    Koelewijn T; Gaudrain E; Tamati T; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Sep; 150(3):1620. PubMed ID: 34598602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Use of Voice Cues for Speaker Gender Recognition in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Meister H; Fürsen K; Streicher B; Lang-Roth R; Walger M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 59(3):546-56. PubMed ID: 27135985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Spectral Contrast Enhancement on Speech-on-Speech Intelligibility and Voice Cue Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Users.
    El Boghdady N; Langner F; Gaudrain E; Başkent D; Nogueira W
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):271-289. PubMed ID: 32925307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Channel Interaction on Vocal Cue Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Nogueira W; Boghdady NE; Langner F; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211030166. PubMed ID: 34461780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. School-age children benefit from voice gender cue differences for the perception of speech in competing speech.
    Nagels L; Gaudrain E; Vickers D; Hendriks P; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 May; 149(5):3328. PubMed ID: 34241121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Children With Normal Hearing Are Efficient Users of Fundamental Frequency and Vocal Tract Length Cues for Voice Discrimination.
    Zaltz Y; Goldsworthy RL; Eisenberg LS; Kishon-Rabin L
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):182-193. PubMed ID: 31107364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Voice and Emphasis in Arabic Coronal Stops: Evidence for Phonological Compensation.
    Kulikov V
    Lang Speech; 2022 Mar; 65(1):73-104. PubMed ID: 33455538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of speaker gender on Cantonese tone perception.
    Lai W; Kuang J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):4119. PubMed ID: 32611181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of voice perception is dissociated across gender cues in school-age children.
    Nagels L; Gaudrain E; Vickers D; Hendriks P; Başkent D
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):5074. PubMed ID: 32193411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cue-specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English.
    Francis AL; Kaganovich N; Driscoll-Huber C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1234-51. PubMed ID: 18681610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flexible cue use in nonnative phonetic categorization.
    Broersma M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):712-5. PubMed ID: 18681562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in perceptual adaptability of foreign sound categories.
    Schertz J; Cho T; Lotto A; Warner N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):355-67. PubMed ID: 26404530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structured speaker variability in Japanese stops: Relationships within versus across cues to stop voicing.
    Tanner J; Sonderegger M; Stuart-Smith J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Aug; 148(2):793. PubMed ID: 32872992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in cue weights are stable across time: the case of Japanese stop lengths.
    Idemaru K; Holt LL; Seltman H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3950-64. PubMed ID: 23231125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influences of fundamental frequency, formant frequencies, aperiodicity, and spectrum level on the perception of voice gender.
    Skuk VG; Schweinberger SR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 57(1):285-96. PubMed ID: 23882002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does good perception of vocal characteristics relate to better speech-on-speech intelligibility for cochlear implant users?
    El Boghdady N; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jan; 145(1):417. PubMed ID: 30710943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) are sensitive to the correlation between pitch and timbre in human speech.
    Sturdy SK; Smith DRR; George DN
    Anim Cogn; 2022 Jun; 25(3):545-554. PubMed ID: 34714438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.