These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36586964)

  • 41. Individual Differences in Categorization Gradience As Predicted by Online Processing of Phonetic Cues During Spoken Word Recognition: Evidence From Eye Movements.
    Ou J; Yu ACL; Xiang M
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Mar; 45(3):e12948. PubMed ID: 33682211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Attentional Modulation and Individual Differences in Explaining the Changing Role of Fundamental Frequency in Korean Laryngeal Stop Perception.
    Kong EJ; Lee H
    Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):384-408. PubMed ID: 28937301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Individual differences in processing non-speech acoustic signals influence cue weighting strategies for L2 speech contrasts.
    Liu X
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2022 Aug; 51(4):903-916. PubMed ID: 35320458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Contextually dependent cue realization and cue weighting for a laryngeal contrast in Shanghai Wu.
    Zhang J; Yan H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Sep; 144(3):1293. PubMed ID: 30424656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Phonetic categorisation and cue weighting in adolescents with Specific Language Impairment (SLI).
    Tuomainen O; Stuart NJ; van der Lely HK
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2015 Jul; 29(7):557-72. PubMed ID: 25970138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Influence of voice properties on vowel perception depends on speaker context.
    Krumbiegel J; Ufer C; Blank H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Aug; 152(2):820. PubMed ID: 36050169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues.
    Clayards M; Tanenhaus MK; Aslin RN; Jacobs RA
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):804-9. PubMed ID: 18582855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Revisiting the acoustics of speaker gender perception: A gender expansive perspective.
    Merritt B; Bent T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jan; 151(1):484. PubMed ID: 35105035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Individual variability in cue-weighting and lexical tone learning.
    Chandrasekaran B; Sampath PD; Wong PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):456-65. PubMed ID: 20649239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. When pitch Accents Encode Speaker Commitment: Evidence from French Intonation.
    Michelas A; Portes C; Champagne-Lavau M
    Lang Speech; 2016 Jun; 59(Pt 2):266-93. PubMed ID: 27363256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.
    Bishop J; Keating P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1100-12. PubMed ID: 22894229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The role of pitch and timing cues in the perception of phrasal grouping in Seoul Korean.
    Jeon HS; Nolan F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3039-49. PubMed ID: 23654407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Perception of acoustic cues to Tokyo Japanese pitch-accent contrasts in native Japanese and naive English listeners.
    Shport IA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):307-18. PubMed ID: 26233031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A landmark-cue-based approach to analyzing the acoustic realizations of American English intervocalic flaps.
    Yun S; Choi JY; Shattuck-Hufnagel S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):EL471. PubMed ID: 32611168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Brainstem and early cortical auditory activities associated with language differences in acoustic cue weighting for voicing perception.
    Tamura S; Sung Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2020 Sep; 735():135154. PubMed ID: 32544598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Differences in Sibilant Perception between Gender Expansive and Cisgender Individuals.
    Hope M; Lilley J
    Semin Speech Lang; 2023 Mar; 44(2):61-75. PubMed ID: 36882071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length cues on sentence segregation by listeners with hearing loss.
    Mackersie CL; Dewey J; Guthrie LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):1006-19. PubMed ID: 21877813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The role of creaky voice in Cantonese tonal perception.
    Yu KM; Lam HW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1320. PubMed ID: 25190405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Age-related perceptual difference of Kyungsang Korean accent contrast: A diachronic observation.
    Lee H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):EL367. PubMed ID: 30522281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Integrating Voice Quality Cues in the Pitch Perception of Speech and Non-speech Utterances.
    Kuang J; Liberman M
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2147. PubMed ID: 30555365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.