BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36587401)

  • 1. The impact of cage positioning on lumbar lordosis and disc space restoration following minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
    Issa TZ; Lee Y; Lambrechts MJ; Tran KS; Trenchfield D; Baker S; Fras S; Yalla GR; Kurd MF; Woods BI; Rihn JA; Canseco JA; Hilibrand AS; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK; Schroeder GD
    Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jan; 54(1):E7. PubMed ID: 36587401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does interbody cage lordosis impact actual segmental lordosis achieved in minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion?
    Lovecchio FC; Vaishnav AS; Steinhaus ME; Othman YA; Gang CH; Iyer S; McAnany SJ; Albert TJ; Qureshi SA
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E17. PubMed ID: 32871566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increased cage angle effects on radiographic outcomes after stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Nguyen AQ; Ukogu C; Harvey JP; Federico VP; Nolte MT; Khanna K; Sheha ED; Gandhi SD; Phillips FM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Aug; 39(2):254-262. PubMed ID: 37148223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lordosis restoration after anterior longitudinal ligament release and placement of lateral hyperlordotic interbody cages during the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach: a radiographic study in cadavers.
    Uribe JS; Smith DA; Dakwar E; Baaj AA; Mundis GM; Turner AW; Cornwall GB; Akbarnia BA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Nov; 17(5):476-85. PubMed ID: 22938554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.
    Ahlquist S; Park HY; Gatto J; Shamie AN; Park DY
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29631061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do Lordotic Cages Provide Better Segmental Lordosis Versus Nonlordotic Cages in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF)?
    Sembrano JN; Horazdovsky RD; Sharma AK; Yson SC; Santos ERG; Polly DW
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 May; 30(4):E338-E343. PubMed ID: 28437335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of the cage height and positioning on clinical and radiographic outcome of lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study.
    Wu C; Bian H; Liu J; Zhao D; Yang H; Chen C; Sun X; Guan B; Sun G; Liu G; Xu B; Ma X; Wang Z; Yang Q
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Dec; 23(1):1075. PubMed ID: 36482344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of sagittal contour and posterior disc height following interbody fusion: threaded cylindrical cages versus structural allograft versus vertical cages.
    Groth AT; Kuklo TR; Klemme WR; Polly DW; Schroeder TM
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Aug; 18(4):332-6. PubMed ID: 16021014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of interbody approach and lumbar level on segmental, adjacent, and sagittal alignment in degenerative lumbar pathology: a radiographic analysis six months following surgery.
    O'Connor B; Drolet CE; Leveque JA; Nemani V; Krause KL; Dorsi M; Schroerlucke S; Shen J; Louie PK
    Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1318-1324. PubMed ID: 35351666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic comparison of L5-S1 lateral anterior lumbar interbody fusion cage subsidence and displacement by fixation strategy: anterior plate versus integrated screws.
    Theologis AA; Patel S; Burch S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Jan; 38(1):126-130. PubMed ID: 36057128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correction of severe spinopelvic mismatch: decreased blood loss with lateral hyperlordotic interbody grafts as compared with pedicle subtraction osteotomy.
    Leveque JC; Yanamadala V; Buchlak QD; Sethi RK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E15. PubMed ID: 28760028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do Radiographic Results of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Vary with Cage Position in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Diseases?
    Ding Q; Tang X; Zhang R; Wu H; Liu C
    Orthop Surg; 2022 Apr; 14(4):730-741. PubMed ID: 35302296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overpowering posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion with hyperlordotic anterior lumbar interbody cages followed by posterior revision: a preliminary feasibility study.
    Kadam A; Wigner N; Saville P; Arlet V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):650-660. PubMed ID: 28960160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study.
    Armocida D; Pesce A; Cimatti M; Proietti L; Santoro A; Frati A
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Dec; 156():e57-e63. PubMed ID: 34492389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Restoration and maintenance of segment lordosis in oblique lumbar interbody fusion.
    Gong K; Lin Y; Wang Z; Li F; Xiong W
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Oct; 23(1):914. PubMed ID: 36242007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of intradiscal vacuum phenomenon on surgical outcome of lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease.
    Yen CP; Beckman JM; Vivas AC; Bach K; Uribe JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Apr; 26(4):419-425. PubMed ID: 27982763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of steerable cage placement during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on lumbar lordosis.
    Lindley TE; Viljoen SV; Dahdaleh NS
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 21(3):441-4. PubMed ID: 24207010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.