These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

535 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36587409)

  • 21. Does loss of spondylolisthesis reduction impact clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Steinhaus ME; Vaishnav AS; Shah SP; Clark NJ; Chaudhary CB; Othman YA; Urakawa H; Samuel AM; Lovecchio FC; Sheha ED; McAnany SJ; Qureshi SA
    Spine J; 2022 Jan; 22(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 34118417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ten-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Kwon JW; Park Y; Lee BH; Yoon SR; Ha JW; Kim H; Suk KS; Moon SH; Kim HS; Lee HM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Jun; 47(11):773-780. PubMed ID: 35125463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radiological adjacent-segment degeneration in L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison between dynamic stabilization and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kuo CH; Huang WC; Wu JC; Tu TH; Fay LY; Wu CL; Cheng H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 29856306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
    World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 22120269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of lumbar surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Glassman SD; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):2885-91. PubMed ID: 24768731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Percutaneous Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE RA-TLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note and Two Years Clinical Results.
    Chang M; Wang L; Yuan S; Tian Y; Zhao Y; Liu X
    Pain Physician; 2022 Jan; 25(1):E73-E86. PubMed ID: 35051154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT).
    de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Kuijk SM; Evers SM; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Oct; 17(1):417. PubMed ID: 27716168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Effects of robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and traditional open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Cui GY; Tian W; He D; Xing YG; Liu B; Yuan Q; Wang YQ; Sun YQ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 55(7):543-548. PubMed ID: 28655085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Revisions for screw malposition and clinical outcomes after robot-guided lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Schröder ML; Staartjes VE
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 May; 42(5):E12. PubMed ID: 28463610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective, controlled observational study of short-term outcome.
    Hartmann S; Lang A; Lener S; Abramovic A; Grassner L; Thomé C
    Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Oct; 45(5):3417-3426. PubMed ID: 36064875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Prospective comparative study of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Wu D; Shu T; Lu Q; Shen M
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2024 May; 38(5):521-528. PubMed ID: 38752236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surgical outcomes of patients who fail to reach minimal clinically important differences: comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ayling OGS; Rampersaud YR; Dandurand C; Yuan PHS; Ailon T; Dea N; McIntosh G; Christie SD; Abraham E; Bailey CS; Johnson MG; Bouchard J; Weber MH; Paquet J; Finkelstein J; Stratton A; Hall H; Manson N; Thomas K; Fisher CG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Sep; 37(3):376-383. PubMed ID: 35426818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Comparison of mid-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion assisted with three-dimensional microscope in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Yu Y; Wang Y; Xie Y; Xu J; Chen Y; Fan X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jan; 37(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 36708116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Cui GY; Han XG; Wei Y; Liu YJ; He D; Sun YQ; Liu B; Tian W
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 34516712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Davis BJ; Aaronson O; Devin C; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Aug; 15(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 21529203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
    Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Patient-reported and radiographic outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis with or without reduction: A comparative study.
    Fan G; Zhang H; Guan X; Gu G; Wu X; Hu A; Gu X; He S
    J Clin Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 33():111-118. PubMed ID: 27443498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Levin JM; Tanenbaum JE; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Overley SC
    Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):1088-1098. PubMed ID: 29452283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Posterolateral Fusion Alone in the Treatment of Grade 1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Tang AR; Chanbour H; Steinle AM; Jonzzon S; Roth SG; Gardocki RJ; Stephens BF; Abtahi AM; Zuckerman SL
    Neurosurgery; 2023 Jul; 93(1):186-197. PubMed ID: 36848669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.