These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36587411)

  • 1. Toxicogenomics scoring system: TGSS, a novel integrated risk assessment model for chemical carcinogenicity prediction.
    Lu H; Yang D; Shi Y; Chen K; Li P; Huang S; Cui D; Feng Y; Wang T; Yang J; Zhu X; Xia D; Wu Y
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2023 Jan; 250():114466. PubMed ID: 36587411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toxicogenomics applied to in vitro carcinogenicity testing with Balb/c 3T3 cells revealed a gene signature predictive of chemical carcinogens.
    Rohrbeck A; Salinas G; Maaser K; Linge J; Salovaara S; Corvi R; Borlak J
    Toxicol Sci; 2010 Nov; 118(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 20713471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Carcinogenome Project: In Vitro Gene Expression Profiling of Chemical Perturbations to Predict Long-Term Carcinogenicity.
    Li A; Lu X; Natoli T; Bittker J; Sipes NS; Subramanian A; Auerbach S; Sherr DH; Monti S
    Environ Health Perspect; 2019 Apr; 127(4):47002. PubMed ID: 30964323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter-laboratory study of human in vitro toxicogenomics-based tests as alternative methods for evaluating chemical carcinogenicity: a bioinformatics perspective.
    Herwig R; Gmuender H; Corvi R; Bloch KM; Brandenburg A; Castell J; Ceelen L; Chesne C; Doktorova TY; Jennen D; Jennings P; Limonciel A; Lock EA; McMorrow T; Phrakonkham P; Radford R; Slattery C; Stierum R; Vilardell M; Wittenberger T; Yildirimman R; Ryan M; Rogiers V; Kleinjans J
    Arch Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 90(9):2215-2229. PubMed ID: 26525393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic models of short-term exposure accurately predict long-term chemical carcinogenicity and identify putative mechanisms of action.
    Gusenleitner D; Auerbach SS; Melia T; Gómez HF; Sherr DH; Monti S
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e102579. PubMed ID: 25058030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Integrated Approach Using Publicly Available Resources for Identifying and Characterizing Chemicals of Potential Toxicity Concern: Proof-of-Concept With Chemicals That Affect Cancer Pathways.
    Iyer S; Pham N; Marty M; Sandy M; Solomon G; Zeise L
    Toxicol Sci; 2019 May; 169(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 30649495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of toxicogenomics approaches for assessing the risk of nongenotoxic carcinogenicity in rat liver.
    Eichner J; Wrzodek C; Römer M; Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Zell A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e97678. PubMed ID: 24828355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting environmental chemical factors associated with disease-related gene expression data.
    Patel CJ; Butte AJ
    BMC Med Genomics; 2010 May; 3():17. PubMed ID: 20459635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing compound carcinogenicity in vitro using connectivity mapping.
    Caiment F; Tsamou M; Jennen D; Kleinjans J
    Carcinogenesis; 2014 Jan; 35(1):201-7. PubMed ID: 23940306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterizing and predicting carcinogenicity and mode of action using conventional and toxicogenomics methods.
    Waters MD; Jackson M; Lea I
    Mutat Res; 2010 Dec; 705(3):184-200. PubMed ID: 20399889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toxicogenomics and cancer risk assessment: a framework for key event analysis and dose-response assessment for nongenotoxic carcinogens.
    Bercu JP; Jolly RA; Flagella KM; Baker TK; Romero P; Stevens JL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 58(3):369-81. PubMed ID: 20801182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of environmental chemicals targeting miscarriage genes and pathways using the comparative toxicogenomics database.
    Harris SM; Jin Y; Loch-Caruso R; Padilla IY; Meeker JD; Bakulski KM
    Environ Res; 2020 May; 184():109259. PubMed ID: 32143025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-platform toxicogenomics for the prediction of non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogenesis in rat.
    Römer M; Eichner J; Metzger U; Templin MF; Plummer S; Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Zell A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e97640. PubMed ID: 24830643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting the hepatocarcinogenic potential of alkenylbenzene flavoring agents using toxicogenomics and machine learning.
    Auerbach SS; Shah RR; Mav D; Smith CS; Walker NJ; Vallant MK; Boorman GA; Irwin RD
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 243(3):300-14. PubMed ID: 20004213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ranking transitive chemical-disease inferences using local network topology in the comparative toxicogenomics database.
    King BL; Davis AP; Rosenstein MC; Wiegers TC; Mattingly CJ
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e46524. PubMed ID: 23144783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Next-generation text-mining mediated generation of chemical response-specific gene sets for interpretation of gene expression data.
    Hettne KM; Boorsma A; van Dartel DA; Goeman JJ; de Jong E; Piersma AH; Stierum RH; Kleinjans JC; Kors JA
    BMC Med Genomics; 2013 Jan; 6():2. PubMed ID: 23356878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The comet assay with multiple mouse organs: comparison of comet assay results and carcinogenicity with 208 chemicals selected from the IARC monographs and U.S. NTP Carcinogenicity Database.
    Sasaki YF; Sekihashi K; Izumiyama F; Nishidate E; Saga A; Ishida K; Tsuda S
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2000 Nov; 30(6):629-799. PubMed ID: 11145306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
    Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.