These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36587465)

  • 21. Symmetrical Viewpoint Representations in Face-Selective Regions Convey an Advantage in the Perception and Recognition of Faces.
    Flack TR; Harris RJ; Young AW; Andrews TJ
    J Neurosci; 2019 May; 39(19):3741-3751. PubMed ID: 30842248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Why do you attract me but not others? Retrieval of person knowledge and its generalization bring diverse judgments of facial attractiveness.
    Han S; Liu S; Li Y; Li W; Wang X; Gan Y; Xu Q; Zhang L
    Soc Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 15(5):505-515. PubMed ID: 32602802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of averageness on judgments of facial attractiveness: no own-age or own-sex advantage among children attending single-sex schools.
    Vingilis-Jaremko L; Maurer D; Gao X
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Apr; 120():1-16. PubMed ID: 24326246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces.
    Vokey JR; Read JD
    Mem Cognit; 1992 May; 20(3):291-302. PubMed ID: 1508054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Facial aging, attractiveness, and distinctiveness.
    Deffenbacher KA; Vetter T; Johanson J; O'Toole AJ
    Perception; 1998; 27(10):1233-43. PubMed ID: 10505202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Postencoding cognitive processes in the cross-race effect: Categorization and individuation during face recognition.
    Ho MR; Pezdek K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Jun; 23(3):771-80. PubMed ID: 26391033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The role of holistic processing in judgments of facial attractiveness.
    Abbas ZA; Duchaine B
    Perception; 2008; 37(8):1187-96. PubMed ID: 18853555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ensemble perception of facial attractiveness.
    Luo AX; Zhou G
    J Vis; 2018 Aug; 18(8):7. PubMed ID: 30105386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recognition memory for realistic synthetic faces.
    Yotsumoto Y; Kahana MJ; Wilson HR; Sekuler R
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Sep; 35(6):1233-44. PubMed ID: 17948069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Understanding facial impressions between and within identities.
    Mileva M; Young AW; Kramer RSS; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():184-198. PubMed ID: 31102977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Incomplete faces are completed using a more average face.
    Kramer RSS; Jones AL
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Aug; 7(1):79. PubMed ID: 35984540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The many faces of a face: Comparing stills and videos of facial expressions in eight dimensions (SAVE database).
    Garrido MV; Lopes D; Prada M; Rodrigues D; Jerónimo R; Mourão RP
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1343-1360. PubMed ID: 27573005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Individual differences in perceptual sensitivity and representation of facial signals of trustworthiness.
    Baccolo E; Macchi Cassia V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):224-236. PubMed ID: 30589353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of colored face masks on judgments of facial attractiveness and gaze patterns.
    Prahm C; Konieczny J; Bressler M; Heinzel J; Daigeler A; Kolbenschlag J; Lauer H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Sep; 239():103994. PubMed ID: 37541135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Categorization training changes the visual representation of face identity.
    Soto FA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 31152373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Preadolescents' recognition of faces of unfamiliar peers: the effect of attractiveness of faces.
    Mallet P; Lallemand N
    J Genet Psychol; 2003 Dec; 164(4):453-71. PubMed ID: 14719778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modeling individual preferences reveals that face beauty is not universally perceived across cultures.
    Zhan J; Liu M; Garrod OGB; Daube C; Ince RAA; Jack RE; Schyns PG
    Curr Biol; 2021 May; 31(10):2243-2252.e6. PubMed ID: 33798430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Typicality and face recognition: a critical re-evaluation of the two factor theory.
    Morris PE; Wickham LH
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Aug; 54(3):863-77. PubMed ID: 11548038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Social categorization modulates own-age bias in face recognition and ERP correlates of face processing.
    Rollins L; Olsen A; Evans M
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Apr; 141():107417. PubMed ID: 32135182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Same critical features are used for identification of familiarized and unfamiliar faces.
    Abudarham N; Yovel G
    Vision Res; 2019 Apr; 157():105-111. PubMed ID: 29360472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.