These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36587503)

  • 1. Input modality matters: A comparison of touch, speech, and gesture based in-vehicle interaction.
    Zhang T; Liu X; Zeng W; Tao D; Li G; Qu X
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Apr; 108():103958. PubMed ID: 36587503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of Gesture-Based Interaction on Driving Behavior: A Driving Simulator Study Using the Projection-Based Vehicle-in-the-Loop.
    Graichen L; Graichen M; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2022 Mar; 64(2):324-342. PubMed ID: 32795200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chinese handwriting while driving: Effects of handwritten box size on in-vehicle information systems usability and driver distraction.
    Zhong Q; Guo G; Zhi J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 36178277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the safety and usability of touch gestures in operating in-vehicle information systems with visual occlusion.
    Kim H; Song H
    Appl Ergon; 2014 May; 45(3):789-98. PubMed ID: 24231034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Gesture-Based In-Vehicle Interaction: User Experience and the Potential to Reduce Driver Distraction.
    Graichen L; Graichen M; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2019 Aug; 61(5):774-792. PubMed ID: 30694705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to Interact with a Fully Autonomous Vehicle: Naturalistic Ways for Drivers to Intervene in the Vehicle System While Performing Non-Driving Related Tasks.
    Ataya A; Kim W; Elsharkawy A; Kim S
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Mar; 21(6):. PubMed ID: 33801147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feel the noise: Mid-air ultrasound haptics as a novel human-vehicle interaction paradigm.
    Large DR; Harrington K; Burnett G; Georgiou O
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102909. PubMed ID: 31422270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
    Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Address inputting while driving: a comparison of four alternative text input methods on in-vehicle navigation displays usability and driver distraction.
    Zhong Q; Guo G; Zhi J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(4):163-168. PubMed ID: 35319331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.
    Lin Q; Li S; Ma X; Lu G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparative Study of Accident Risk Related to Speech-Based and Handheld Texting during a Sudden Braking Event in Urban Road Environments.
    Fu R; Chen Y; Xu Q; Guo Y; Yuan W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32781529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the forces of driver distraction: Explainable predictions for the visual demand of in-vehicle touchscreen interactions.
    Ebel P; Lingenfelder C; Vogelsang A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Apr; 183():106956. PubMed ID: 36681017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are child occupants a significant source of driving distraction?
    Koppel S; Charlton J; Kopinathan C; Taranto D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1236-44. PubMed ID: 21376923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
    Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard.
    Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Aug; 93():207-216. PubMed ID: 27209155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On-Road Evaluation of In-vehicle Interface Characteristics and Their Effects on Performance of Visual Detection on the Road and Manual Entry.
    Suh Y; Ferris TK
    Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):105-118. PubMed ID: 30059239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech-based E-mail and driver behavior: effects of an in-vehicle message system interface.
    Jamson AH; Westerman SJ; Hockey GR; Carsten OM
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):625-39. PubMed ID: 15709325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using Sound to Reduce Visual Distraction from In-vehicle Human-Machine Interfaces.
    Larsson P; Niemand M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S25-30. PubMed ID: 26027972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effects of Driver Distraction for Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injuries.
    Neyens DM; Boyle LN; Schultheis MT
    Hum Factors; 2015 Dec; 57(8):1472-88. PubMed ID: 26186925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Driving with pets and motor vehicle collision involvement among older drivers: A prospective population-based study.
    Huisingh C; Levitan EB; Irvin MR; Owsley C; McGwin G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Mar; 88():169-74. PubMed ID: 26774042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.