These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36587529)

  • 1. The effect of preference learning on context effects in multi-alternative, multi-attribute choice.
    Liu Y; Trueblood JS
    Cognition; 2023 Apr; 233():105365. PubMed ID: 36587529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Computational Model of Attention Control in Multi-Attribute, Context-Dependent Decision Making.
    Jung K; Jeong J; Kralik JD
    Front Comput Neurosci; 2019; 13():40. PubMed ID: 31354461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How do insects choose flowers? A review of multi-attribute flower choice and decoy effects in flower-visiting insects.
    Latty T; Trueblood JS
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Dec; 89(12):2750-2762. PubMed ID: 32961583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Framing Options as Choice or Opportunity: Does the Frame Influence Decisions?
    Abhyankar P; Summers BA; Velikova G; Bekker HL
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):567-82. PubMed ID: 24732048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. VAMP (Voting Agent Model of Preferences): A computational model of individual multi-attribute choice.
    Bergner AS; Oppenheimer DM; Detre G
    Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103971. PubMed ID: 31234078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dynamic computational model of gaze and choice in multi-attribute decisions.
    Yang X; Krajbich I
    Psychol Rev; 2023 Jan; 130(1):52-70. PubMed ID: 35025570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A multi-measure analysis of the similarity, attraction, and compromise effects in multi-attribute decision making].
    Tsuzuki T; Matsui H; Kikuchi M
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2012 Dec; 83(5):398-408. PubMed ID: 23379078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Not just for consumers: context effects are fundamental to decision making.
    Trueblood JS; Brown SD; Heathcote A; Busemeyer JR
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jun; 24(6):901-8. PubMed ID: 23610134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive and Neural Bases of Multi-Attribute, Multi-Alternative, Value-based Decisions.
    Busemeyer JR; Gluth S; Rieskamp J; Turner BM
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2019 Mar; 23(3):251-263. PubMed ID: 30630672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A generalized distance function for preferential choices.
    Berkowitsch NA; Scheibehenne B; Rieskamp J; Matthäus M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):310-25. PubMed ID: 25677976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attribute commensurability and context effects in preferential choice.
    Hayes WM; Holmes WR; Trueblood JS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39285131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Women's preferences for attributes of first-trimester miscarriage management: a stated preference discrete-choice experiment.
    Petrou S; McIntosh E
    Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 18798807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The 2N-ary Choice Tree Model for N-Alternative Preferential Choice.
    Wollschläger LM; Diederich A
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():189. PubMed ID: 22723788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-attribute, multi-alternative models of choice: Choice, reaction time, and process tracing.
    Cohen AL; Kang N; Leise TL
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Nov; 98():45-72. PubMed ID: 28843070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Context-dependent preferences in starlings: linking ecology, foraging and choice.
    Vasconcelos M; Monteiro T; Kacelnik A
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e64934. PubMed ID: 23705019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequent winners explain apparent skewness preferences in experience-based decisions.
    Olschewski S; Spektor MS; Le Mens G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Mar; 121(12):e2317751121. PubMed ID: 38489382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Associations and the accumulation of preference.
    Bhatia S
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Jul; 120(3):522-43. PubMed ID: 23607600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multialternative context effects obtained using an inference task.
    Trueblood JS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct; 19(5):962-8. PubMed ID: 22736437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Context-effect bias in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.): exploring decoy influences in a value-based food choice task.
    Marini M; Boschetti C; Gastaldi S; Addessi E; Paglieri F
    Anim Cogn; 2023 Mar; 26(2):503-514. PubMed ID: 36125642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preference reversals during risk elicitation.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Martin R; Hall L; Johansson P
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Mar; 149(3):585-589. PubMed ID: 31318260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.