These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36588371)

  • 21. Accuracy of a new elastomeric impression material for complete-arch dental implant impressions.
    Baig MR; Buzayan MM; Yunus N
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2018 May; 9(2):e12320. PubMed ID: 29349910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Sorrentino R; Gherlone EF; Calesini G; Zarone F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of 3 different impression techniques for internal connection angulated implants.
    Tsagkalidis G; Tortopidis D; Mpikos P; Kaisarlis G; Koidis P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 26213265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative evaluation of open tray impression technique: investigating the precision of four splinting materials in multiple implants.
    Patil P; Madhav VNV; Alshadidi AAF; Saini RS; Aldosari LIN; Heboyan A; Mosaddad SA; Bin Hassan SA; Chaturvedi S
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):844. PubMed ID: 37940890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of Different Implant Impression Techniques: Evaluation of New Tray Design Concept.
    Liu DY; Cader FN; Abduo J; Palamara J
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e682-e687. PubMed ID: 29286181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of Implant Angulation and Depth on the Accuracy of Casts Using the Open Tray Splinted Impression Technique.
    Taduri T; Mathur S; Upadhyay S; Patel K; Shah M
    J Oral Implantol; 2021 Dec; 47(6):447-454. PubMed ID: 33270885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of different impression coping and scan body designs on the accuracy of conventional versus digital implant impressions: An in vitro study.
    Alkindi S; Hamdoon Z; Aziz AM
    J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105045. PubMed ID: 38714241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of 3D positional accuracy of implant analogs in printed resin models versus conventional stone casts: Effect of implant angulation.
    Tan S; Tan MY; Wong KM; Maria R; Tan KBC
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jan; 33(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 36639956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.
    Menini M; Setti P; Pera F; Pera P; Pesce P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 28965251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of accuracy of various impression techniques and impression materials in recording multiple implants placed unilaterally in a partially edentulous mandible- An
    Parameshwari G; Chittaranjan B; Sudhir N; Anulekha-Avinash CK; Taruna M; Ramureddy M
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Apr; 10(4):e388-e395. PubMed ID: 29750102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of the accuracy of impressions made of 2 implants with interfering axial convergence with CAD-CAM impression copings and the altered cast technique: An in vitro study.
    Sadegholvad M; Ansarifard E; Derafshi R; Dehno SMS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):745.e1-745.e7. PubMed ID: 36309469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does Splinting the Direct Copings Increase the Impression Accuracy of Two-Unit Nonparallel Implant Restorations? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Ma Y; Al-Radhi RYZ; Jiang L; Yu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):653-659. PubMed ID: 35904821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of implant cast accuracy of multiple implant impression technique with different splinting materials: An in vitro study.
    Selvaraj S; Dorairaj J; Mohan J; Simon P
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 27141167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of dental implant angulation on the dimensional accuracy of master casts.
    Barjini N; Sayahpour S; Jafari M
    Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(4):473-482. PubMed ID: 34994115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Splinting Open Tray Impression Copings Using Long Shank Carbide Burs during Definitive Impression: A Dental Technique.
    Fernandes DS; Anasane NS; Jagtap AK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 May; 23(5):566-568. PubMed ID: 35986468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dimensional accuracy of different techniques used for complete-arch multi-implant impressions.
    Ghanem RA; Nassani MZ; Baroudi K; Abdel Fattah A
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2016 Aug; 7(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 25944669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Accuracy of Four Impression-making Techniques in Angulated Implants Based on Vertical Gap.
    Saboury A; Neshandar Asli H; Dalili Kajan Z
    J Dent (Shiraz); 2017 Dec; 18(4):289-297. PubMed ID: 29201973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
    Hariharan R; Shankar C; Rajan M; Baig MR; Azhagarasan NS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.