145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36588968)
1. Combination of Binary System with Ki67 Immunohistochemical Staining: a Reliable Grading Method for Oral Epithelial Dysplasia.
Akafzadeh N; Baghaei F; Derakhshan S; Moradzadeh Khiavi M; Kharazifard M; Aminishakib P
J Dent (Shiraz); 2022 Sep; 23(2 Suppl):377-382. PubMed ID: 36588968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-observer and inter-observer variability in two grading systems for oral epithelial dysplasia: A multi-centre study in India.
Ranganathan K; Kavitha L; Sharada P; Bavle RM; Rao RS; Pattanshetty SM; Hazarey VK; Madhura MG; Nagaraj T; Lingappa A; Warnakulasuriya S
J Oral Pathol Med; 2020 Oct; 49(9):948-955. PubMed ID: 32516857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter- and intra-observer variability in three grading systems for oral epithelial dysplasia.
Krishnan L; Karpagaselvi K; Kumarswamy J; Sudheendra US; Santosh KV; Patil A
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2016; 20(2):261-8. PubMed ID: 27601820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why oral histopathology suffers inter-observer variability on grading oral epithelial dysplasia: an attempt to understand the sources of variation.
Kujan O; Khattab A; Oliver RJ; Roberts SA; Thakker N; Sloan P
Oral Oncol; 2007 Mar; 43(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 16931119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calibration improves the agreement in grading oral epithelial dysplasia-Findings from a National Workshop in Malaysia.
Kallarakkal TG; Zaini ZM; Ghani WMN; Karen-Ng LP; Siriwardena BSMS; Cheong SC; Tilakaratne WM
J Oral Pathol Med; 2024 Jan; 53(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 38081145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ki67, CD105, and α-SMA expressions better relate the binary oral epithelial dysplasia grading system of World Health Organization.
Gadbail AR; Chaudhary MS; Sarode SC; Gawande M; Korde S; Tekade SA; Gondivkar S; Hande A; Maladhari R
J Oral Pathol Med; 2017 Nov; 46(10):921-927. PubMed ID: 28672080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Risk for Transformation to Cancer: Comparison Between Histologic Grading Systems Versus S100A7 Immunohistochemical Signature-based Grading.
Darling MR; Hwang JTK; Dickson BJ; Cutz JC; Salama S; McCord C; Pritzker KPH; Mock D; Thompson LDR
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2023 Jul; 31(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 37249075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Grading systems of oral cavity pre-malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yan F; Reddy PD; Nguyen SA; Chi AC; Neville BW; Day TA
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Nov; 277(11):2967-2976. PubMed ID: 32447493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Grading of oral epithelial dysplasia: Points to ponder.
Geetha KM; Leeky M; Narayan TV; Sadhana S; Saleha J
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2015; 19(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 26604497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a new binary system of grading oral epithelial dysplasia for prediction of malignant transformation.
Kujan O; Oliver RJ; Khattab A; Roberts SA; Thakker N; Sloan P
Oral Oncol; 2006 Nov; 42(10):987-93. PubMed ID: 16731030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can dual staining with p16 and Ki67 be biomarkers of epithelial dysplasia in oral lesions?
Bharti A; Qayoom S; Jaiswal R; Agarwal P; Singh RK; Agarwal SP; Bhalla S; Makker A; Goel MM
J Cancer Res Ther; 2022; 18(4):1003-1008. PubMed ID: 36149153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic importance of mitosis quantification and PHH3 expression in oral epithelial dysplasia.
Sathyamoorthy H; Mahmood H; Zubir AZA; Hankinson P; Khurram SA
Virchows Arch; 2024 Jan; 484(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 37882821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Binary and WHO dysplasia grading systems for the prediction of malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia and erythroplakia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Freitas Silva BS; Batista DCR; de Souza Roriz CF; Silva LR; Normando AGC; Dos Santos Silva AR; Silva MAG; Yamamoto-Silva FP
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jul; 25(7):4329-4340. PubMed ID: 34050426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oral epithelial dysplasia grading: Comparing the binary system to the traditional 3-tier system, an actuarial study with malignant transformation as outcome.
Sperandio M; Warnakulasuriya S; Soares AB; Passador-Santos F; Mariano FV; Lima CSP; Scarini JF; Dominguete MHL; de Camargo Moraes P; Montalli VAM; Hellmeister L; de Araújo VC
J Oral Pathol Med; 2023 May; 52(5):418-425. PubMed ID: 36177736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Update on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Pathology for Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Research.
Alajaji SA; Khoury ZH; Jessri M; Sciubba JJ; Sultan AS
Head Neck Pathol; 2024 May; 18(1):38. PubMed ID: 38727841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The clinical utility of contemporary oral epithelial dysplasia grading systems.
Sathasivam HP; Sloan P; Thomson PJ; Robinson M
J Oral Pathol Med; 2022 Feb; 51(2):180-187. PubMed ID: 34797585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter- and Intra-Observer Variability in Diagnosis of Oral Dysplasia.
R SA; B N P; Hegde U; K U; G S; G K; Sil S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2017 Dec; 18(12):3251-3254. PubMed ID: 29286215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential Immunohistochemical Biomarkers for Grading Oral Dysplasia: A Literature Review.
Zdrojewski J; Nowak M; Nijakowski K; Jankowski J; Scribante A; Gallo S; Pascadopoli M; Surdacka A
Biomedicines; 2024 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 38540190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of immunohistochemical expression of MCM2 and Ki67 in oral epithelial dysplasia and oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Swain S; Nishat R; Ramachandran S; Raghuvanshi M; Behura SS; Kumar H
J Cancer Res Ther; 2022; 18(4):997-1002. PubMed ID: 36149152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility of grading systems in oral epithelial dysplasia.
Manchanda A; Shetty DC
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2012 Nov; 17(6):e935-42. PubMed ID: 22549675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
