These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36588968)

  • 1. Combination of Binary System with Ki67 Immunohistochemical Staining: a Reliable Grading Method for Oral Epithelial Dysplasia.
    Akafzadeh N; Baghaei F; Derakhshan S; Moradzadeh Khiavi M; Kharazifard M; Aminishakib P
    J Dent (Shiraz); 2022 Sep; 23(2 Suppl):377-382. PubMed ID: 36588968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra-observer and inter-observer variability in two grading systems for oral epithelial dysplasia: A multi-centre study in India.
    Ranganathan K; Kavitha L; Sharada P; Bavle RM; Rao RS; Pattanshetty SM; Hazarey VK; Madhura MG; Nagaraj T; Lingappa A; Warnakulasuriya S
    J Oral Pathol Med; 2020 Oct; 49(9):948-955. PubMed ID: 32516857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inter- and intra-observer variability in three grading systems for oral epithelial dysplasia.
    Krishnan L; Karpagaselvi K; Kumarswamy J; Sudheendra US; Santosh KV; Patil A
    J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2016; 20(2):261-8. PubMed ID: 27601820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why oral histopathology suffers inter-observer variability on grading oral epithelial dysplasia: an attempt to understand the sources of variation.
    Kujan O; Khattab A; Oliver RJ; Roberts SA; Thakker N; Sloan P
    Oral Oncol; 2007 Mar; 43(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 16931119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calibration improves the agreement in grading oral epithelial dysplasia-Findings from a National Workshop in Malaysia.
    Kallarakkal TG; Zaini ZM; Ghani WMN; Karen-Ng LP; Siriwardena BSMS; Cheong SC; Tilakaratne WM
    J Oral Pathol Med; 2024 Jan; 53(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 38081145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding interobserver variability of pathologists to improve oral epithelial dysplasia grading.
    Ng GTE; Phang SC; Yu KS; Tiwari L; Khurram SA; Sloan P; Kujan O
    Oral Dis; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39039698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ki67, CD105, and α-SMA expressions better relate the binary oral epithelial dysplasia grading system of World Health Organization.
    Gadbail AR; Chaudhary MS; Sarode SC; Gawande M; Korde S; Tekade SA; Gondivkar S; Hande A; Maladhari R
    J Oral Pathol Med; 2017 Nov; 46(10):921-927. PubMed ID: 28672080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Risk for Transformation to Cancer: Comparison Between Histologic Grading Systems Versus S100A7 Immunohistochemical Signature-based Grading.
    Darling MR; Hwang JTK; Dickson BJ; Cutz JC; Salama S; McCord C; Pritzker KPH; Mock D; Thompson LDR
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2023 Jul; 31(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 37249075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grading systems of oral cavity pre-malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yan F; Reddy PD; Nguyen SA; Chi AC; Neville BW; Day TA
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Nov; 277(11):2967-2976. PubMed ID: 32447493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Grading of oral epithelial dysplasia: Points to ponder.
    Geetha KM; Leeky M; Narayan TV; Sadhana S; Saleha J
    J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2015; 19(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 26604497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a new binary system of grading oral epithelial dysplasia for prediction of malignant transformation.
    Kujan O; Oliver RJ; Khattab A; Roberts SA; Thakker N; Sloan P
    Oral Oncol; 2006 Nov; 42(10):987-93. PubMed ID: 16731030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can dual staining with p16 and Ki67 be biomarkers of epithelial dysplasia in oral lesions?
    Bharti A; Qayoom S; Jaiswal R; Agarwal P; Singh RK; Agarwal SP; Bhalla S; Makker A; Goel MM
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2022; 18(4):1003-1008. PubMed ID: 36149153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic importance of mitosis quantification and PHH3 expression in oral epithelial dysplasia.
    Sathyamoorthy H; Mahmood H; Zubir AZA; Hankinson P; Khurram SA
    Virchows Arch; 2024 Jan; 484(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 37882821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binary and WHO dysplasia grading systems for the prediction of malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia and erythroplakia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Freitas Silva BS; Batista DCR; de Souza Roriz CF; Silva LR; Normando AGC; Dos Santos Silva AR; Silva MAG; Yamamoto-Silva FP
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jul; 25(7):4329-4340. PubMed ID: 34050426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oral epithelial dysplasia grading: Comparing the binary system to the traditional 3-tier system, an actuarial study with malignant transformation as outcome.
    Sperandio M; Warnakulasuriya S; Soares AB; Passador-Santos F; Mariano FV; Lima CSP; Scarini JF; Dominguete MHL; de Camargo Moraes P; Montalli VAM; Hellmeister L; de Araújo VC
    J Oral Pathol Med; 2023 May; 52(5):418-425. PubMed ID: 36177736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Update on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Pathology for Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Research.
    Alajaji SA; Khoury ZH; Jessri M; Sciubba JJ; Sultan AS
    Head Neck Pathol; 2024 May; 18(1):38. PubMed ID: 38727841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The clinical utility of contemporary oral epithelial dysplasia grading systems.
    Sathasivam HP; Sloan P; Thomson PJ; Robinson M
    J Oral Pathol Med; 2022 Feb; 51(2):180-187. PubMed ID: 34797585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter- and Intra-Observer Variability in Diagnosis of Oral Dysplasia.
    R SA; B N P; Hegde U; K U; G S; G K; Sil S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2017 Dec; 18(12):3251-3254. PubMed ID: 29286215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Potential Immunohistochemical Biomarkers for Grading Oral Dysplasia: A Literature Review.
    Zdrojewski J; Nowak M; Nijakowski K; Jankowski J; Scribante A; Gallo S; Pascadopoli M; Surdacka A
    Biomedicines; 2024 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 38540190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of immunohistochemical expression of MCM2 and Ki67 in oral epithelial dysplasia and oral squamous cell carcinoma.
    Swain S; Nishat R; Ramachandran S; Raghuvanshi M; Behura SS; Kumar H
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2022; 18(4):997-1002. PubMed ID: 36149152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.