These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36591887)
1. Mesh-tissue integration of synthetic and biologic meshes in wall surgery: brief state of art. Greco Lucchina A; Koleva Radica M; Costa AL; Mortellaro C; Soliani G; Zavan B Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Dec; 26(3 Suppl):21-25. PubMed ID: 36591887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resorbable Synthetic Meshes for Abdominal Wall Defects in Preclinical Setting: A Literature Review. Miserez M; Jairam AP; Boersema GSA; Bayon Y; Jeekel J; Lange JF J Surg Res; 2019 May; 237():67-75. PubMed ID: 30710881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pore size and pore shape--but not mesh density--alter the mechanical strength of tissue ingrowth and host tissue response to synthetic mesh materials in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair. Lake SP; Ray S; Zihni AM; Thompson DM; Gluckstein J; Deeken CR J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Feb; 42():186-97. PubMed ID: 25486631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs. Majumder A; Winder JS; Wen Y; Pauli EM; Belyansky I; Novitsky YW Surgery; 2016 Oct; 160(4):828-838. PubMed ID: 27452954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of contracture, adhesion, tissue ingrowth, and histologic response characteristics of permanent and absorbable barrier meshes in a porcine model of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Deeken CR; Matthews BD Hernia; 2012 Feb; 16(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 21748478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cell-coating affects tissue integration of synthetic and biologic meshes: comparative analysis of the onlay and underlay mesh positioning in rats. Majumder A; Gao Y; Sadava EE; Anderson JM; Novitsky YW Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4445-53. PubMed ID: 26895904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective evaluation of adhesion characteristics to intraperitoneal mesh and adhesiolysis-related complications during laparoscopic re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair. Jenkins ED; Yom V; Melman L; Brunt LM; Eagon JC; Frisella MM; Matthews BD Surg Endosc; 2010 Dec; 24(12):3002-7. PubMed ID: 20445995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Semiresorbable biologic hybrid meshes for ventral abdominal hernia repair in potentially contaminated settings: lower risk of recurrence. Goetz M; Jurczyk M; Junger H; Schlitt HJ; Brunner SM; Brennfleck FW Updates Surg; 2022 Dec; 74(6):1995-2001. PubMed ID: 36223064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Large pore size and controlled mesh elongation are relevant predictors for mesh integration quality and low shrinkage--Systematic analysis of key parameters of meshes in a novel minipig hernia model. Weyhe D; Cobb W; Lecuivre J; Alves A; Ladet S; Lomanto D; Bayon Y Int J Surg; 2015 Oct; 22():46-53. PubMed ID: 26277532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of biological and alloplastic meshes in ventral incisional hernia repair. Koscielny A; Widenmayer S; May T; Kalff J; Lingohr P Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2018 Mar; 403(2):255-263. PubMed ID: 29214543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combined in vivo and ex vivo analysis of mesh mechanics in a porcine hernia model. Kahan LG; Lake SP; McAllister JM; Tan WH; Yu J; Thompson D; Brunt LM; Blatnik JA Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):820-830. PubMed ID: 28733734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biologic meshes are not superior to synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study with long-term follow-up evaluation. Ditzel M; Deerenberg EB; Grotenhuis N; Harlaar JJ; Monkhorst K; Bastiaansen-Jenniskens YM; Jeekel J; Lange JF Surg Endosc; 2013 Oct; 27(10):3654-62. PubMed ID: 23549771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Properties of meshes used in hernia repair: a comprehensive review of synthetic and biologic meshes. Ibrahim AM; Vargas CR; Colakoglu S; Nguyen JT; Lin SJ; Lee BT J Reconstr Microsurg; 2015 Feb; 31(2):83-94. PubMed ID: 25192272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics of different mesh types for abdominal wall repair in an experimental model of peritonitis. Kaufmann R; Jairam AP; Mulder IM; Wu Z; Verhelst J; Vennix S; Giesen LJX; Clahsen-van Groningen MC; Jeekel J; Lange JF Br J Surg; 2017 Dec; 104(13):1884-1893. PubMed ID: 28901533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between tissue ingrowth and mesh contraction. Gonzalez R; Fugate K; McClusky D; Ritter EM; Lederman A; Dillehay D; Smith CD; Ramshaw BJ World J Surg; 2005 Aug; 29(8):1038-43. PubMed ID: 15977079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the repair of potentially contaminated and contaminated abdominal wall defects. Atema JJ; de Vries FE; Boermeester MA Am J Surg; 2016 Nov; 212(5):982-995.e1. PubMed ID: 27443425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]