190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36593473)
1. Preference heterogeneity in health valuation: a latent class analysis of the Peru EQ-5D-5L values.
Karim S; Craig BM; Tejada RA; Augustovski F
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2023 Jan; 21(1):1. PubMed ID: 36593473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring the importance of controlling heteroskedasticity and heterogeneity in health valuation: a case study on Dutch EQ-5D-5L.
Karim S; Craig BM; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2022 May; 20(1):85. PubMed ID: 35614472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peruvian Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L: A Direct Comparison of Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments.
Augustovski F; Belizán M; Gibbons L; Reyes N; Stolk E; Craig BM; Tejada RA
Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):880-888. PubMed ID: 32762989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L with composite time trade-off for the German population - an exploratory study.
Ludwig K; von der Schulenburg JG; Greiner W
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Feb; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 28219389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan.
Shiroiwa T; Ikeda S; Noto S; Igarashi A; Fukuda T; Saito S; Shimozuma K
Value Health; 2016; 19(5):648-54. PubMed ID: 27565282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.
Ferreira PL; Antunes P; Ferreira LN; Pereira LN; Ramos-Goñi JM
Qual Life Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 31201730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Valuation of EQ-5D-5L in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A National Representative Study.
Al-Jedai A; Almudaiheem H; Al-Salamah T; Aldosari M; Almutairi AR; Almogbel Y; AlRuthia Y; Althemery AU; Alluhidan M; Roudijk B; Purba FD; Awad N; O'jeil R
Value Health; 2024 May; 27(5):552-561. PubMed ID: 38342365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The EQ-5D-5L valuation study for Trinidad and Tobago.
Bailey H; Jonker MF; Pullenayegum E; Rencz F; Roudijk B
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2024 Jul; 22(1):51. PubMed ID: 38956543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parallel Valuation: A Direct Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Societal Value Sets.
Law EH; Pickard AS; Xie F; Walton SM; Lee TA; Schwartz A
Med Decis Making; 2018 Nov; 38(8):968-982. PubMed ID: 30403577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol.
Pickard AS; Law EH; Jiang R; Pullenayegum E; Shaw JW; Xie F; Oppe M; Boye KS; Chapman RH; Gong CL; Balch A; Busschbach JJV
Value Health; 2019 Aug; 22(8):931-941. PubMed ID: 31426935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Choice Defines QALYs: A US Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L.
Craig BM; Rand K
Med Care; 2018 Jun; 56(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 29668646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preparatory study for the revaluation of the EQ-5D tariff: methodology report.
Mulhern B; Bansback N; Brazier J; Buckingham K; Cairns J; Devlin N; Dolan P; Hole AR; Kavetsos G; Longworth L; Rowen D; Tsuchiya A
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Feb; 18(12):vii-xxvi, 1-191. PubMed ID: 24568945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using Time Trade-Off Values to Estimate EQ-5D-Y Value Sets: An Exploratory Study.
Yang Z; Jiang J; Wang P; Wu J; Fang Y; Feng D; Xi X; Luo N
Value Health; 2023 Jul; 26(7):968-973. PubMed ID: 36921897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of online and face-to-face valuation of the EQ-5D-5L using composite time trade-off.
Jiang R; Shaw J; Mühlbacher A; Lee TA; Walton S; Kohlmann T; Norman R; Pickard AS
Qual Life Res; 2021 May; 30(5):1433-1444. PubMed ID: 33247810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Censoring in the time trade-off valuation of worse-than-dead EQ-5D-5L health states: can a time-based willingness-to-accept question be the solution?
Liao M; Rand K; Yang Z; Hsu CN; Lin HW; Luo N
Qual Life Res; 2023 Apr; 32(4):1165-1174. PubMed ID: 36564637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficient Designs for Valuation Studies That Use Time Tradeoff (TTO) Tasks to Map Latent Utilities from Discrete Choice Experiments to the Interval Scale: Selection of Health States for TTO Tasks.
Che M; Pullenayegum E
Med Decis Making; 2023 Apr; 43(3):387-396. PubMed ID: 36866604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the Introduction of the Ranking Task in Valuation Studies Improve Data Quality and Reduce Inconsistencies? The Case of the EQ-5D-5L.
Ramos-Goñi JM; Rand-Hendriksen K; Pinto-Prades JL
Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 27325340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Valuation Survey of EQ-5D-Y Based on the International Common Protocol: Development of a Value Set in Japan.
Shiroiwa T; Ikeda S; Noto S; Fukuda T; Stolk E
Med Decis Making; 2021 Jul; 41(5):597-606. PubMed ID: 33754886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experience-Based Swedish TTO and VAS Value Sets for EQ-5D-5L Health States.
Burström K; Teni FS; Gerdtham UG; Leidl R; Helgesson G; Rolfson O; Henriksson M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Aug; 38(8):839-856. PubMed ID: 32307663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does Controlling for Scale Heterogeneity Better Explain Respondents' Preference Segmentation in Discrete Choice Experiments? A Case Study of US Health Insurance Demand.
Karim S; Craig BM; Poteet S
Med Decis Making; 2021 Jul; 41(5):573-583. PubMed ID: 33703964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
