BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3659386)

  • 1. Radiation therapy of periaortic node metastases in cancer of the uterine cervix and endometrium.
    Potish RA
    Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):567-70. PubMed ID: 3659386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Irradiation of para-aortic lymph node metastases from carcinoma of the cervix or endometrium. Preliminary results.
    Komaki R; Mattingly RF; Hoffman RG; Barber SW; Satre R; Greenberg M
    Radiology; 1983 Apr; 147(1):245-8. PubMed ID: 6828738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lymphadenectomy as a prognostic marker in uterine non-endometrioid carcinoma.
    Mylonas I; Schindlbeck C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jan; 285(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 21538008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Risk factors and prognosis of node-positive cervical carcinoma].
    Feng SY; Zhang YN; Liu JG
    Ai Zheng; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1261-6. PubMed ID: 16219145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Paraaortic lymph node radiotherapy in cancer of the uterine corpus.
    Potish RA; Twiggs LB; Adcock LL; Savage JE; Levitt SH; Prem KA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 65(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 3969238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Prognostic factors in uterine cervical and corpus cancer].
    Yoshioka T; Inoue Y; Hoshiai H; Noda K
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1995 Sep; 22(10):1417-22. PubMed ID: 7668881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extended field irradiation for carcinoma of the uterine cervix with positive periaortic nodes.
    Vigliotti AP; Wen BC; Hussey DH; Doornbos JF; Staples JJ; Jani SK; Turner DA; Anderson B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1992; 23(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 1612950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The treatment of uterine carcinomas. A report on the cure results at the Hannover Medical College].
    Feldmann HJ; Gefeller D; Majewski A
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1991 Aug; 167(8):452-60. PubMed ID: 1887361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Surgical treatment of cervix cancer. A 6-year material from a regional hospital].
    Hagen B; Skjeldestad FE; Tingulstad S; Onsrud M; Halvorsen T
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Sep; 114(22):2603-5. PubMed ID: 7985176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patterns of spread in node-positive cervical cancer: the relationship between local control and distant metastases.
    Stock RG; Chen AS; Karasek K
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1996; 2(5):256-62. PubMed ID: 9166542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Prognostic significance of lymph node metastases in operable cervix cancer of categories T1 and T2].
    Krafft W; Wagner F; Marzotko F; Cotte U; Behling H; Brückmann D
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1985; 107(17):1041-9. PubMed ID: 4060912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Para-aortic node biopsy in cervical and endometrial cancers: does it affect survival?
    Blythe JG; Hodel KA; Wahl TP; Baglan RJ; Lee FA; Zivnuska FR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Aug; 155(2):306-14. PubMed ID: 3740147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Wertheim-operation: 5-year survival of 501 consecutive patients with cervical cancer].
    Papp Z; Csapó Z; Mayer A; Hupuczi P
    Orv Hetil; 2006 Mar; 147(12):537-45. PubMed ID: 16696377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of surgical debulking in cancer of the uterine cervix.
    Potish RA; Downey GO; Adcock LL; Prem KA; Twiggs LB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1989 Nov; 17(5):979-84. PubMed ID: 2808060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with isolated para-aortic lymph node metastases from uterine cervical and corpus cancer.
    Choi CW; Cho CK; Yoo SY; Kim MS; Yang KM; Yoo HJ; Seo YS; Kang JK; Lee DH; Lee KH; Lee ED; Rhu SY; Choi SC; Kim MH; Kim BJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 May; 74(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 18990511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment of maxillary sinus carcinoma: a comparison of the 1997 and 1977 American Joint Committee on cancer staging systems.
    Le QT; Fu KK; Kaplan M; Terris DJ; Fee WE; Goffinet DR
    Cancer; 1999 Nov; 86(9):1700-11. PubMed ID: 10547542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Involvement of para-aortic lymph nodes in carcinoma of the cervix.
    Bonanno JP; Boyce J; Fruchter R; Khulpateea N; Macasaet M; Remy JC
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1980 May; 79(9):567-71. PubMed ID: 7380676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix: prognosis in stage IB.
    Yazigi R; Sandstad J; Munoz AK; Choi DJ; Nguyen PD; Risser R
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jun; 75(6):1012-5. PubMed ID: 2342726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Therapy of paraaortic lymph node metastases of cervix cancer].
    Köhler AH; Blaudow K
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1986; 108(11):677-83. PubMed ID: 3751377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Histopathological factors influencing pelvic lymph node metastases in two or more sites in patients with cervical carcinoma undergoing radical hysterectomy.
    Kamura T; Shigematsu T; Kaku T; Shimamoto T; Saito T; Sakai K; Mitsumoto M; Nakano H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 May; 78(5):452-7. PubMed ID: 10326894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.