These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36594500)

  • 21. Attentional modulation of neural responses to illusory shapes: Evidence from steady-state and evoked visual potentials.
    Wittenhagen L; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Mar; 125():70-80. PubMed ID: 30711611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Competitive interactions of attentional resources in early visual cortex during sustained visuospatial attention within or between visual hemifields: evidence for the different-hemifield advantage.
    Walter S; Quigley C; Mueller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 May; 26(5):938-54. PubMed ID: 24345166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Willed Attentional Selection of Visual Features: An EEG Study.
    Wang J; Wang J; Hu J; Tong S; Hong X; Sun J
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2024; 32():1586-1595. PubMed ID: 38557619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Behavioral performance follows the time course of neural facilitation and suppression during cued shifts of feature-selective attention.
    Andersen SK; Müller MM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Aug; 107(31):13878-82. PubMed ID: 20643918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Steady-state visual evoked potentials differentiate between internally and externally directed attention.
    Kritzman L; Eidelman-Rothman M; Keil A; Freche D; Sheppes G; Levit-Binnun N
    Neuroimage; 2022 Jul; 254():119133. PubMed ID: 35339684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluating the feasibility of the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) to study temporal attention.
    Mora-Cortes A; Ridderinkhof KR; Cohen MX
    Psychophysiology; 2018 May; 55(5):e13029. PubMed ID: 29119621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A category-specific top-down attentional set can affect the neural responses outside the current focus of attention.
    Jiang Y; Wu X; Gao X
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 Oct; 659():80-85. PubMed ID: 28735084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sustained selective attention to chromatic information enhances visuocortical gain at the population level.
    Panitz C; Keil A; Müller MM
    Eur J Neurosci; 2023 Sep; 58(6):3518-3530. PubMed ID: 37560804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Distinct patterns of spatial attentional modulation of steady-state visual evoked magnetic fields (SSVEFs) in subdivisions of the human early visual cortex.
    Moratti S; Gundlach C; de Echegaray J; Müller MM
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Feb; 61(2):e14452. PubMed ID: 37787386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Concurrent recording of steady-state and transient event-related potentials as indices of visual-spatial selective attention.
    Müller MM; Hillyard S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Sep; 111(9):1544-52. PubMed ID: 10964063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Neural responses to target features outside a search array are enhanced during conjunction but not unique-feature search.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Travis SL; Mattingley JB
    J Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 34(9):3390-401. PubMed ID: 24573295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of sustained selective attention on steady-state visual evoked potentials.
    Mahajan Y; Ching A; Watson T; Kim J; Davis C
    Exp Brain Res; 2022 Jan; 240(1):249-261. PubMed ID: 34727219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bottom-up biases in feature-selective attention.
    Andersen SK; Müller MM; Martinovic J
    J Neurosci; 2012 Nov; 32(47):16953-8. PubMed ID: 23175846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Higher amplitudes in steady-state visual evoked potentials driven by square-wave versus sine-wave contrast modulation - A dual-laboratory study.
    Panitz C; Gundlach C; Boylan MR; Keil A; Müller MM
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14287. PubMed ID: 36906882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Top-Down Attention Is Limited Within but Not Between Feature Dimensions.
    Adamian N; Slaustaite E; Andersen SK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 31(8):1173-1183. PubMed ID: 30794058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spatiotemporal dynamics of feature-based attention spread: evidence from combined electroencephalographic and magnetoencephalographic recordings.
    Stoppel CM; Boehler CN; Strumpf H; Krebs RM; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM; Schoenfeld MA
    J Neurosci; 2012 Jul; 32(28):9671-6. PubMed ID: 22787052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Causal involvement of visual area MT in global feature-based enhancement but not contingent attentional capture.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuroimage; 2015 Sep; 118():90-102. PubMed ID: 26067347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Object-based selection of irrelevant features is not confined to the attended object.
    Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2231-9. PubMed ID: 20666592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Determinants of Global Color-Based Selection in Human Visual Cortex.
    Bartsch MV; Boehler CN; Stoppel CM; Merkel C; Heinze HJ; Schoenfeld MA; Hopf JM
    Cereb Cortex; 2015 Sep; 25(9):2828-41. PubMed ID: 24770709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Exploring the temporal dynamics of inhibition of return using steady-state visual evoked potentials.
    Lim A; Janssen SMJ; Satel J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2020 Dec; 20(6):1349-1364. PubMed ID: 33236297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.