These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36596909)

  • 1. Selection within working memory impairs perceptual detection.
    Macedo-Pascual J; Capilla A; Campo P; Hinojosa JA; Poch C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1442-1451. PubMed ID: 36596909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retro-cue benefits in working memory without sustained focal attention.
    Rerko L; Souza AS; Oberauer K
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jul; 42(5):712-28. PubMed ID: 24442551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diverting the focus of attention in working memory through a perceptual task.
    Gao Z; Li J; Wu J; Dai A; Liao H; Shen M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jun; 48(6):876-905. PubMed ID: 35084929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection within working memory based on a color retro-cue modulates alpha oscillations.
    Poch C; Capilla A; Hinojosa JA; Campo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():133-137. PubMed ID: 28958909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrospective Selection in Visual and Tactile Working Memory Is Mediated by Shared Control Mechanisms.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 32(3):546-557. PubMed ID: 31659924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expectance of low contrast retro-cues does not modulate anticipatory alpha power.
    Macedo-Pascual J; Campo P; Capilla A; Hinojosa JA; Poch C
    Biol Psychol; 2022 Sep; 173():108400. PubMed ID: 35853588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early top-down control of internal selection induced by retrospective cues in visual working memory: advantage of peripheral over central cues.
    Han S; Zhou H; Tian Y; Ku Y
    Prog Neurobiol; 2023 Nov; 230():102521. PubMed ID: 37673370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oscillatory correlates of prioritization of emotional stimuli in WM: The interaction between bottom-up and top-down processes.
    Macedo-Pascual J; Hinojosa JA; Poch C
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Jul; 145():167-173. PubMed ID: 31102670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect.
    Souza AS; Oberauer K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1839-60. PubMed ID: 27098647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bottom-up perceptual salience and top-down retro-cues concurrently determine state in visual working memory.
    Fan L; Zhang L; Diao L; Xu M; Chen R; Zhang X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):459-470. PubMed ID: 32988297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ocular working memory signals are flexible to behavioral priority and subjective imagery strength.
    Dong Y; Kiyonaga A
    J Neurophysiol; 2024 Jul; 132(1):162-176. PubMed ID: 38836298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the fate of non-cued mental representations in visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence by a retro-cuing paradigm.
    Schneider D; Mertes C; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 293():114-24. PubMed ID: 26196953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of retro-cue validity on working memory representation: Evidence from electroencephalograms.
    Fu X; Ye C; Hu Z; Li Z; Liang T; Liu Q
    Biol Psychol; 2022 Apr; 170():108320. PubMed ID: 35337895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.
    Barth A; Schneider D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13062. PubMed ID: 29315628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural mechanisms by which attention modulates the comparison of remembered and perceptual representations.
    Kuo BC; Astle DE
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86666. PubMed ID: 24466193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological evidence supports the role of sustained visuospatial attention in maintaining visual WM contents.
    Liang T; Chen X; Ye C; Zhang J; Liu Q
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():54-62. PubMed ID: 31639381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adverse orienting effects on visual working memory encoding and maintenance.
    Wang B; Yan C; Wang Z; Olivers CNL; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1261-1267. PubMed ID: 27896633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.