These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36596986)

  • 1. The effects of search-irrelevant working memory content on visual search.
    Calleja MO; Willoughby AR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Feb; 85(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 36596986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guidance of attention by information held in working memory.
    Calleja MO; Rich AN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 May; 75(4):687-99. PubMed ID: 23404521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term memory for distractors: Effects of involuntary attention from working memory.
    Moriya J
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Feb; 52(2):401-416. PubMed ID: 37768481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oculomotor capture by search-irrelevant features in visual working memory: on the crucial role of target-distractor similarity.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2379-2392. PubMed ID: 32166644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The presence of a distractor matching the content of working memory induces delayed quitting in visual search.
    Wu Y; Pan Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):760-770. PubMed ID: 35359229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Working memory and target-related distractor effects on visual search.
    Balani AB; Soto D; Humphreys GW
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1058-76. PubMed ID: 21156870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Action Planning Mediates Guidance of Visual Attention from Working Memory.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    J Ophthalmol; 2015; 2015():387378. PubMed ID: 26171241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Object-based Encoding in Visual Working Memory: Evidence from Memory-driven Attentional Capture.
    Gao Z; Yu S; Zhu C; Shui R; Weng X; Li P; Shen M
    Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():22822. PubMed ID: 26956084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory.
    Soto D; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):730-7. PubMed ID: 17563233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Memory-driven capture during focused visual attention.
    Yang Y; Su L; Pan Y
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; 88(4):1389-1398. PubMed ID: 38478053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Different prioritization states of working memory representations affect visual searches: Evidence from an event-related potential study.
    Wang M; Liu H; Chen Y; Yang P; Fu S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2023 Nov; 193():112246. PubMed ID: 37739042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Vision (Basel); 2019 Aug; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 31735843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple representations in visual working memory simultaneously guide attention: The type of memory-matching representation matters.
    Fan L; Sun M; Xu M; Li Z; Diao L; Zhang X
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():126-137. PubMed ID: 30471521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic selection of irrelevant object features through working memory: evidence for top-down attentional capture.
    Soto D; Humphreys GW
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 19289358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oculomotor capture reveals trial-by-trial neural correlates of attentional guidance by contents of visual working memory.
    Beck VM; Vickery TJ
    Cortex; 2020 Jan; 122():159-169. PubMed ID: 30392969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing the temporal dynamics and efficacy of task-relevant and task-irrelevant memory-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Cogn Process; 2022 May; 23(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 35001208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention.
    Olivers CN; Meijer F; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Oct; 32(5):1243-65. PubMed ID: 17002535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maintaining rejected distractors in working memory during visual search depends on search stimuli: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.
    Williams LH; Drew T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):67-84. PubMed ID: 33000442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feature-based guidance of attention by visual working memory is applied independently of remembered object location.
    Hollingworth A; Bahle B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 31140137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.