BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36598048)

  • 1. Outcome and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Long-acting G-CSF as Primary Prophylaxis of Neutropenia Induced by Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients, From a Retrospective Study.
    Wang Y; Zhao C; Ma P; Jiang D
    Cancer Control; 2023; 30():10732748221140289. PubMed ID: 36598048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer in Taiwan.
    Tseng TH; Chiang SC; Hsu JC; Ko Y
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0303294. PubMed ID: 38857244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Cost-effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with PEG-rhG-CSF in early-stage breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in China].
    Xia W; Wang SS; Hu H; Zhao FL; Xu F; Hong RX; Jiang KK; Yuan ZY; Shi YX; Zhao K; Huang JJ; Xue C; Bi XW; Lu QY; An X; Zhang JM
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 42(10):861-867. PubMed ID: 33113628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors economically justified for adjuvant TC chemotherapy in breast cancer?
    Skedgel C; Rayson D; Younis T
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Jan; 24(1):387-394. PubMed ID: 26081595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor use and medical costs after initial adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients with early-stage breast cancer.
    Griffiths RI; Barron RL; Gleeson ML; Danese MD; O'Hagan A; Chia VM; Legg JC; Lyman GH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Feb; 30(2):103-18. PubMed ID: 21967155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients.
    Lathia N; Isogai PK; De Angelis C; Smith TJ; Cheung M; Mittmann N; Hoch JS; Walker S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Aug; 105(15):1078-85. PubMed ID: 23873405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK.
    Liu Z; Doan QV; Malin J; Leonard R
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2009; 7(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 19799473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of primary versus secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.
    Ramsey SD; Liu Z; Boer R; Sullivan SD; Malin J; Doan QV; Dubois RW; Lyman GH
    Value Health; 2009; 12(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 18673353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving FEC-D.
    Lee EK; Wong WW; Trudeau ME; Chan KK
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Feb; 150(1):169-80. PubMed ID: 25694355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus six days of filgrastim for preventing febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients.
    Danova M; Chiroli S; Rosti G; Doan QV
    Tumori; 2009; 95(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 19579869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
    Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia among breast cancer and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients under Taiwan's national health insurance system.
    Wen TJ; Wen YW; Chien CR; Chiang SC; Hsu WW; Shen LJ; Hsiao FY
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Apr; 23(2):288-293. PubMed ID: 27491287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
    Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia in breast cancer in the United Kingdom.
    Whyte S; Cooper KL; Stevenson MD; Madan J; Akehurst R
    Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):465-74. PubMed ID: 21669371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-utility analysis of primary prophylaxis versus secondary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with diffuse aggressive lymphoma receiving curative-intent chemotherapy.
    Chan KK; Siu E; Krahn MD; Imrie K; Alibhai SM
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Apr; 30(10):1064-71. PubMed ID: 22393098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of primary granulocyte-colony stimulating factor prophylaxis on neutropenic toxicity and chemotherapy dose delivery in Chinese patients with breast cancer who received adjuvant docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.
    Kwok CCH; Wong WH; Chan LL; Wong SPY; Wang F; Wong MCS; Tse SLA
    Hong Kong Med J; 2022 Dec; 28(6):438-446. PubMed ID: 36261264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness of Primary Prophylaxis of Febrile Neutropenia During Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.
    Yu JL; Chan K; Kurin M; Pasetka M; Kiss A; Sridhar SS; Warner E
    Breast J; 2015; 21(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 26387577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany].
    Sehouli J; Goertz A; Steinle T; Dubois R; Plesnila-Frank C; Lalla A; von Minckwitz G
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Mar; 135(9):385-9. PubMed ID: 20180162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suboptimal duration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in women diagnosed with breast cancer.
    Lin WT; Wen YW; Chien CR; Gau CS; Chiang SC; Hsiao FY
    Clin Ther; 2014 Sep; 36(9):1287-94. PubMed ID: 25130388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Duration of short-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for primary prophylaxis and risk of neutropenia-related hospitalization in older patients with cancer.
    Li S; Liu J; Gong T; Guo H; Gawade PL; Kelsh MA; Bradbury BD; Belani R; Lyman GH
    J Geriatr Oncol; 2020 Nov; 11(8):1309-1315. PubMed ID: 32624415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.