162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36598063)
1. Considerations for hyperpolarized
Traechtler J; Fuetterer M; Albannay MM; Hoh T; Kozerke S
Magn Reson Med; 2023 May; 89(5):1945-1960. PubMed ID: 36598063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Theoretical signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution dependence on the magnetic field strength for hyperpolarized noble gas magnetic resonance imaging of human lungs.
Parra-Robles J; Cross AR; Santyr GE
Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):221-9. PubMed ID: 15719973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Susceptibility effects in hyperpolarized (3)He lung MRI at 1.5T and 3T.
Deppe MH; Parra-Robles J; Ajraoui S; Parnell SR; Clemence M; Schulte RF; Wild JM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Aug; 30(2):418-23. PubMed ID: 19629971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Signal-to-noise ratio, T
Komlosi P; Altes TA; Qing K; Mooney KE; Miller GW; Mata JF; de Lange EE; Tobias WA; Cates GD; Mugler JP
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Oct; 78(4):1458-1463. PubMed ID: 27791285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Target definition for malignant gliomas: no difference in radiation treatment volumes between 1.5T and 3T magnetic resonance imaging.
Guarnaschelli JN; Vagal AS; McKenzie JT; McPherson CM; Warnick RE; Batra V; Breneman JC; Lamba MA
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2014; 4(5):e195-e201. PubMed ID: 25194105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging at 3T using a standard quadrature head coil and eight-channel phased-array coil with and without SENSE reconstruction.
Lupo JM; Lee MC; Han ET; Cha S; Chang SM; Berger MS; Nelson SJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Sep; 24(3):520-9. PubMed ID: 16888776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abdominal MR imaging at 3T.
Merkle EM; Dale BM; Paulson EK
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Feb; 14(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 16530632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A review of MR physics: 3T versus 1.5T.
Soher BJ; Dale BM; Merkle EM
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):277-90, v. PubMed ID: 17893049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Joint image and field map estimation for multi-echo hyperpolarized
Traechtler J; Vishnevskiy V; Fuetterer M; Kozerke S
Magn Reson Med; 2021 Jul; 86(1):258-276. PubMed ID: 33660300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of in vivo 2D displacements from spiral cine DENSE at 3T.
Wehner GJ; Suever JD; Haggerty CM; Jing L; Powell DK; Hamlet SM; Grabau JD; Mojsejenko WD; Zhong X; Epstein FH; Fornwalt BK
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Jan; 17(1):5. PubMed ID: 25634468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Aortic 4D flow: quantification of signal-to-noise ratio as a function of field strength and contrast enhancement for 1.5T, 3T, and 7T.
Hess AT; Bissell MM; Ntusi NA; Lewis AJ; Tunnicliffe EM; Greiser A; Stalder AF; Francis JM; Myerson SG; Neubauer S; Robson MD
Magn Reson Med; 2015 May; 73(5):1864-71. PubMed ID: 24934930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 5T magnetic resonance imaging: radio frequency hardware and initial brain imaging.
Wei Z; Chen Q; Han S; Zhang S; Zhang N; Zhang L; Wang H; He Q; Cao P; Zhang X; Liang D; Liu X; Li Y; Zheng H
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 May; 13(5):3222-3240. PubMed ID: 37179946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 1.5T and 3T 1H MR spectroscopy for human brain tumors.
Kim JH; Chang KH; Na DG; Song IC; Kim SJ; Kwon BJ; Han MH
Korean J Radiol; 2006; 7(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 16969044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hyperpolarized 13C MRS surface coil: design and signal-to-noise ratio estimation.
Giovannetti G; Frijia F; Menichetti L; Milanesi M; Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH; De Marchi D; Hartwig V; Positano V; Landini L; Lombardi M; Santarelli MF
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5361-9. PubMed ID: 21089771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR proton spectroscopy for myocardial lipid deposition quantification: a quantitative comparison between 1.5T and 3T.
Venkatesh BA; Lima JA; Bluemke DA; Lai S; Steenbergen C; Liu CY
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Nov; 36(5):1222-30. PubMed ID: 22826193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) at 1.5 and 3 tesla: a phantom study.
Lavdas I; Miquel ME; McRobbie DW; Aboagye EO
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 40(3):682-90. PubMed ID: 24925470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonenhanced ECG-gated time-resolved 4D steady-state free precession (SSFP) MR angiography (MRA) of cerebral arteries: comparison at 1.5T and 3T.
Lanzman RS; Kröpil P; Schmitt P; Wittsack HJ; Orzechowski D; Kuhlemann J; Buchbender C; Miese FR; Antoch G; Blondin D
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e531-5. PubMed ID: 21726972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing signal-to-noise ratio for prostate imaging at 7T and 3T.
Steensma BR; Luttje M; Voogt IJ; Klomp DWJ; Luijten PR; van den Berg CAT; Raaijmakers AJE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 May; 49(5):1446-1455. PubMed ID: 30350388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Field, coil, and echo-time influence on sensitivity and reproducibility of brain proton MR spectroscopy.
Inglese M; Spindler M; Babb JS; Sunenshine P; Law M; Gonen O
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2006 Mar; 27(3):684-8. PubMed ID: 16552016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
