162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36598063)
21. The effects of field strength on stimulated echo and motion compensated spin echo diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance sequences.
Scott AD; Wen K; Luo Y; Huang J; Gover S; Soundarajan R; Ferreira PF; Pennell DJ; Nielles-Vallespin S
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2024 Jun; ():101052. PubMed ID: 38936803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. MR imaging of the pancreas: 1.5T versus 3T.
Edelman RR
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):349-53, vi. PubMed ID: 17893054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Extracranial carotid MR imaging at 3T.
DeMarco JK; Huston J; Nash AK
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Feb; 14(1):109-21. PubMed ID: 16530639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. High-resolution 3D-constructive interference in steady-state MR imaging and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography in neurovascular compression: a comparison between 3T and 1.5T.
Garcia M; Naraghi R; Zumbrunn T; Rösch J; Hastreiter P; Dörfler A
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2012 Aug; 33(7):1251-6. PubMed ID: 22403774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI derived perfusion and ventilation parameters at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers.
Glandorf J; Klimeš F; Voskrebenzev A; Gutberlet M; Behrendt L; Crisosto C; Wacker F; Ciet P; Wild JM; Vogel-Claussen J
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244638. PubMed ID: 33378373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Signal-to-noise ratio for hyperpolarized ³He MR imaging of human lungs: a 1.5 T and 3 T comparison.
Dominguez-Viqueira W; Ouriadov A; O'Halloran R; Fain SB; Santyr GE
Magn Reson Med; 2011 Nov; 66(5):1400-4. PubMed ID: 21523821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Wireless video transmission into the MRI magnet room: implementation and evaluation at 1.5T, 3T and 7T.
Hensen B; Kägebein U; Gutberlet M; Ringe KI; Vo-Chieu VD; Stucht D; Speck O; Vick R; Wacker F; Pannicke E
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2019 Aug; 64(4):373-382. PubMed ID: 30205636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. MR imaging of the prostate: 1.5T versus 3T.
Cornfeld DM; Weinreb JC
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):433-48, viii. PubMed ID: 17893061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quantitative susceptibility mapping across two clinical field strengths: Contrast-to-noise ratio enhancement at 1.5T.
Ippoliti M; Adams LC; Winfried B; Hamm B; Spincemaille P; Wang Y; Makowski MR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1410-1420. PubMed ID: 29659131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Translation of Carbon-13 EPI for hyperpolarized MR molecular imaging of prostate and brain cancer patients.
Gordon JW; Chen HY; Autry A; Park I; Van Criekinge M; Mammoli D; Milshteyn E; Bok R; Xu D; Li Y; Aggarwal R; Chang S; Slater JB; Ferrone M; Nelson S; Kurhanewicz J; Larson PEZ; Vigneron DB
Magn Reson Med; 2019 Apr; 81(4):2702-2709. PubMed ID: 30375043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparing 3T and 1.5T MRI for mapping hippocampal atrophy in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.
Chow N; Hwang KS; Hurtz S; Green AE; Somme JH; Thompson PM; Elashoff DA; Jack CR; Weiner M; Apostolova LG;
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2015 Apr; 36(4):653-60. PubMed ID: 25614473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. MR cholangiopancreatography: 1.5T versus 3T.
Schindera ST; Merkle EM
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):355-64, vi-vii. PubMed ID: 17893055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of an endorectal coil for 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the prostate at 3.0T in comparison to 1.5T: Do we need an endorectal coil?
Hoffner MK; Huebner F; Scholtz JE; Zangos S; Schulz B; Luboldt W; Vogl TJ; Bodelle B
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 85(8):1432-8. PubMed ID: 27423684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Natively fat-suppressed 5D whole-heart MRI with a radial free-running fast-interrupted steady-state (FISS) sequence at 1.5T and 3T.
Bastiaansen JAM; Piccini D; Di Sopra L; Roy CW; Heerfordt J; Edelman RR; Koktzoglou I; Yerly J; Stuber M
Magn Reson Med; 2020 Jan; 83(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 31452244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [3 Tesla MRI: successful results with higher field strengths].
Schmitt F; Grosu D; Mohr C; Purdy D; Salem K; Scott KT; Stoeckel B
Radiologe; 2004 Jan; 44(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 14997868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate at 1.5 versus 3.0T: A prospective comparison study of image quality.
Ullrich T; Quentin M; Oelers C; Dietzel F; Sawicki LM; Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Blondin D; Wittsack HJ; Schimmöller L
Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():192-197. PubMed ID: 28583633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. T2-weighted turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging of canine brain anatomy at 1.5T, 3T, and 7T field strengths.
Jacqmot O; Van Thielen B; Hespel AM; Luijten PR; de Mey J; Van Binst A; Provyn S; Tresignie J
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2022 Jan; 305(1):222-233. PubMed ID: 34357697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In vitro assessment of knee MRI in the presence of metal implants comparing MAVRIC-SL and conventional fast spin echo sequences at 1.5 and 3 T field strength.
Liebl H; Heilmeier U; Lee S; Nardo L; Patsch J; Schuppert C; Han M; Rondak IC; Banerjee S; Koch K; Link TM; Krug R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 May; 41(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 24912802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optimization of steady-state free precession MRI for lung ventilation imaging with
Maunder A; Rao M; Robb F; Wild JM
Magn Reson Med; 2019 Feb; 81(2):1130-1142. PubMed ID: 30387911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Imaging considerations for in vivo 13C metabolic mapping using hyperpolarized 13C-pyruvate.
Yen YF; Kohler SJ; Chen AP; Tropp J; Bok R; Wolber J; Albers MJ; Gram KA; Zierhut ML; Park I; Zhang V; Hu S; Nelson SJ; Vigneron DB; Kurhanewicz J; Dirven HA; Hurd RE
Magn Reson Med; 2009 Jul; 62(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 19319902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
