These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36598734)
1. Mammographic calcifications undergoing percutaneous biopsy: outcome in women with and without a personal history of breast cancer. Bertani V; Berger N; Eberhard M; Lång K; Urbani M; La Grassa M; Balestreri L; Boss A; Frauenfelder T; Marcon M Radiol Med; 2023 Feb; 128(2):149-159. PubMed ID: 36598734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unveiling the potential of breast MRI: a game changer for BI-RADS 4A microcalcifications. Li S; Lin Y; Liu G; Shao Z; Yang Y Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Jul; 206(2):425-435. PubMed ID: 38664289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scoring System to Stratify Malignancy Risks for Mammographic Microcalcifications Based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 5th Edition Descriptors. Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Choi EJ; Kim JA Korean J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1646-1652. PubMed ID: 31854152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MRI for the assessment of malignancy in BI-RADS 4 mammographic microcalcifications. Bennani-Baiti B; Dietzel M; Baltzer PA PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188679. PubMed ID: 29190656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction for Breast Cancer in BI-RADS Category 4 Lesion Categorized by Age and Breast Composition of Women in Songklanagarind Hospital. Noonpradej S; Wangkulangkul P; Woodtichartpreecha P; Laohawiriyakamol S Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2021 Feb; 22(2):531-536. PubMed ID: 33639670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. Bent CK; Bassett LW; D'Orsi CJ; Sayre JW AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1378-83. PubMed ID: 20410428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A matrix of morphology and distribution of calcifications in the breast: Analysis of 849 vacuum-assisted biopsies. Kaltenbach B; Brandenbusch V; Möbus V; Mall G; Falk S; van den Bergh M; Chevalier F; Müller-Schimpfle M Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():221-226. PubMed ID: 28027751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is stereotactic large-core needle biopsy beneficial prior to surgical treatment in BI-RADS 5 lesions? Hoorntje LE; Peeters PH; Mali WP; Borel Rinkes IH Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Jul; 86(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 15319568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of breast MRI for BI-RADS category 4B mammographic microcalcification: based on the 5 Eun NL; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Youk JH; Kim JA Clin Radiol; 2018 Aug; 73(8):750-755. PubMed ID: 29853301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical implications of subcategorizing BI-RADS 4 breast lesions associated with microcalcification: a radiology-pathology correlation study. Sanders MA; Roland L; Sahoo S Breast J; 2010; 16(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 19929890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value? Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Utility of the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Category 4 Breast Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Study in China. Gu Y; Tian JW; Ran HT; Ren WD; Chang C; Yuan JJ; Kang CS; Deng YB; Wang H; Luo BM; Guo SL; Zhou Q; Xue ES; Zhan WW; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang CQ; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu JF; Chen W; Zhang YH; Wang HQ; Li JC; Wang HY; Jiang YX Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S26-S34. PubMed ID: 32768352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Positive Predictive Values of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 Lesions and its Mammographic Morphological Features. Mohapatra SK; Mishra A; Sahoo TK; Nayak RB; Das PK; Nayak B Indian J Surg Oncol; 2021 Mar; 12(1):182-189. PubMed ID: 33814852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. AI-CAD for differentiating lesions presenting as calcifications only on mammography: outcome analysis incorporating the ACR BI-RADS descriptors for calcifications. Yoon J; Lee HS; Kim MJ; Park VY; Kim EK; Yoon JH Eur Radiol; 2022 Oct; 32(10):6565-6574. PubMed ID: 35748900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of malignancy risk stratification of microcalcifications detected on mammography: a study based on the 5th edition of BI-RADS. Kim SY; Kim HY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):2895-901. PubMed ID: 25608770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Stereotactic Mammotome breast biopsy: routine clinical experience and correlation with BI-RADS--classification and histopathology]. Michel SC; Löw R; Singer G; Otto R; Hohl M; Kubik RA Praxis (Bern 1994); 2007 Sep; 96(39):1459-74. PubMed ID: 17966279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5. Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for patients with BI-RADS 3-4 microcalcifications. Jiang Y; Lou J; Wang S; Zhao Y; Wang C; Wang D PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99669. PubMed ID: 24927476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]