These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36599941)

  • 1. Participant perspective on the recall-by-genotype research approach: a mixed-method embedded study with participants of the CHRIS study.
    Biasiotto R; Kösters M; Tschigg K; Pramstaller PP; Brüggemann N; Borsche M; Klein C; Hicks AA; Mascalzoni D
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2023 Nov; 31(11):1218-1227. PubMed ID: 36599941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Balancing scientific interests and the rights of participants in designing a recall by genotype study.
    Mascalzoni D; Biasiotto R; Borsche M; Brüggemann N; De Grandi A; Goegele M; Frygner-Holm S; Klein C; Kösters M; Staunton C; Pramstaller PP; Krawczak M; Hicks AA
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2021 Jul; 29(7):1146-1157. PubMed ID: 33981014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ethics conundrum in Recall by Genotype (RbG) research: Perspectives from birth cohort participants.
    Minion JT; Butcher F; Timpson N; Murtagh MJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202502. PubMed ID: 30114272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethical, legal and social/societal implications (ELSI) of recall-by-genotype (RbG) and genotype-driven-research (GDR) approaches: a scoping review.
    Tschigg K; Consoli L; Biasiotto R; Mascalzoni D
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2022 Sep; 30(9):1000-1010. PubMed ID: 35705790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ten years of dynamic consent in the CHRIS study: informed consent as a dynamic process.
    Mascalzoni D; Melotti R; Pattaro C; Pramstaller PP; Gögele M; De Grandi A; Biasiotto R
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2022 Dec; 30(12):1391-1397. PubMed ID: 36064788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
    Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Return of research results (RoRR) to the healthy CHRIS cohort: designing a policy with the participants.
    Staunton C; Kösters M; Pramstaller PP; Mascalzoni D
    J Community Genet; 2021 Oct; 12(4):577-592. PubMed ID: 34241790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethical Aspects of Genotype Disclosure: Perceptions of Participants in a Nutrigenetic Study in Finland.
    De S; Tringham M; Hopia A; Tahvonen R; Pietilä AM; Vähäkangas K
    Public Health Genomics; 2021; 24(1-2):33-43. PubMed ID: 33486491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis.
    D'Abramo F; Schildmann J; Vollmann J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 16():60. PubMed ID: 26354520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical Issues in Intraoperative Neuroscience Research: Assessing Subjects' Recall of Informed Consent and Motivations for Participation.
    Wexler A; Choi RJ; Ramayya AG; Sharma N; McShane BJ; Buch LY; Donley-Fletcher MP; Gold JI; Baltuch GH; Goering S; Klein E
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2022; 13(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 34227925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Participant recall and understandings of information on biobanking and future genomic research: experiences from a multi-disease community-based health screening and biobank platform in rural South Africa.
    Luthuli M; Ngwenya N; Gumede D; Gunda R; Gareta D; Koole O; Siedner MJ; Wong EB; Seeley J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):43. PubMed ID: 35436913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perspectives of clinical research coordinators on disclosing financial conflicts of interest to potential research participants.
    Friedman JY; Sugarman J; Dhillon JK; Depuy V; Pierre CK; Dinan MA; Allsbrook JS; Schulman KA; Weinfurt KP
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 17715256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do Biobank Recall Studies Matter? Long-Term Follow-Up of Research Participants With Familial Hypercholesterolemia.
    Nurm M; Reigo A; Nõukas M; Leitsalu L; Nikopensius T; Palover M; Annilo T; Alver M; Saar A; Marandi T; Ainla T; Metspalu A; Esko T; Tõnisson N
    Front Genet; 2022; 13():936131. PubMed ID: 35928446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Because I want to be informed, to be part of the decision-making": Patients' insights on informed consent practices by healthcare professionals in South Africa.
    Chima SC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2015 Dec; 18 Suppl():S46-56. PubMed ID: 26620622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does different information disclosure on placebo control affect blinding and trial outcomes? A case study of participant information leaflets of randomized placebo-controlled trials of acupuncture.
    Cheon S; Park HJ; Chae Y; Lee H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jan; 18(1):13. PubMed ID: 29347917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Formalising recall by genotype as an efficient approach to detailed phenotyping and causal inference.
    Corbin LJ; Tan VY; Hughes DA; Wade KH; Paul DS; Tansey KE; Butcher F; Dudbridge F; Howson JM; Jallow MW; John C; Kingston N; Lindgren CM; O'Donavan M; O'Rahilly S; Owen MJ; Palmer CNA; Pearson ER; Scott RA; van Heel DA; Whittaker J; Frayling T; Tobin MD; Wain LV; Smith GD; Evans DM; Karpe F; McCarthy MI; Danesh J; Franks PW; Timpson NJ
    Nat Commun; 2018 Feb; 9(1):711. PubMed ID: 29459775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The goldilocks conundrum: Disclosing discrimination risks in informed consent.
    Prince AER; Suter SM; Uhlmann WR; Scherer AM
    J Genet Couns; 2022 Dec; 31(6):1383-1393. PubMed ID: 35930740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Addressing ethical challenges of disclosure in dementia prediction: limitations of current guidelines and suggestions to proceed.
    Alpinar-Sencan Z; Schicktanz S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 May; 21(1):33. PubMed ID: 32393330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Challenges in informed consent decision-making in Korean clinical research: A participant perspective.
    Choi IS; Choi EY; Lee IH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216889. PubMed ID: 31120918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.