125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36600314)
1. Prognostic impact of
Park HL; Lee SW; Hong JH; Lee J; Lee A; Kwon SJ; Park SY; Yoo IR
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Jan; 23(1):2. PubMed ID: 36600314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 18F-FDG uptake by metastatic axillary lymph nodes on pretreatment PET/CT as a prognostic factor for recurrence in patients with invasive ductal breast cancer.
Song BI; Lee SW; Jeong SY; Chae YS; Lee WK; Ahn BC; Lee J
J Nucl Med; 2012 Sep; 53(9):1337-44. PubMed ID: 22870824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The correlation of
Qu YH; Long N; Ran C; Sun J
Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Mar; 23(3):620-627. PubMed ID: 32683540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic Value of Percentage Change in Metabolic Parameters as Measured by Dual-Time Point
Yoo J; Yoon HJ; Kim BS
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 Oct; 26(10):1131-1137. PubMed ID: 28498790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Percentage change of primary tumor on 18F-FDG PET/CT as a prognostic factor for invasive ductal breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis: Comparison with MRI.
Yoo J; Kim BS; Chung J; Yoon HJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Aug; 96(31):e7657. PubMed ID: 28767583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic value of primary tumor SUV
Yoo J; Yoon HJ; Kim BS
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Jan; 31(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 27645144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma.
Jung NY; Kim SH; Choi BB; Kim SH; Sung MS
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 13():113. PubMed ID: 25889560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Whole-Body Metabolic Tumor Volume, as Determined by (18)F-FDG PET/CT, as a Prognostic Factor of Outcome for Patients With Breast Cancer Who Have Distant Metastasis.
Son SH; Lee SW; Jeong SY; Song BI; Chae YS; Ahn BC; Lee J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Oct; 205(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 26204115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic significance of standardized uptake value and metabolic tumour volume on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Kim JW; Oh JS; Roh JL; Kim JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(9):1353-61. PubMed ID: 26067088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic significance of preoperative
Higuchi T; Nishimukai A; Ozawa H; Fujimoto Y; Yanai A; Miyagawa Y; Murase K; Imamura M; Takatsuka Y; Kitajima K; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():5-12. PubMed ID: 27569020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Elevated tumor-to-liver uptake ratio (TLR) from
Huang J; Huang L; Zhou J; Duan Y; Zhang Z; Wang X; Huang P; Tan S; Hu P; Wang J; Huang M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Nov; 44(12):1958-1968. PubMed ID: 28812134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic implication of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
Son SH; Kim DH; Hong CM; Kim CY; Jeong SY; Lee SW; Lee J; Ahn BC
BMC Cancer; 2014 Aug; 14():585. PubMed ID: 25112709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lymph node standardized uptake values at pre-treatment
Jeong Y; Baek S; Park JW; Joo JH; Kim JS; Lee SW
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160239. PubMed ID: 28008776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical utility of FDG uptake within reticuloendothelial system on F-18 FDG PET/CT for prediction of tumor recurrence in breast cancer.
Bang JI; Yoon HJ; Kim BS
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208861. PubMed ID: 30532215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Systemic Staging of Newly Diagnosed Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Versus Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.
Hogan MP; Goldman DA; Dashevsky B; Riedl CC; Gönen M; Osborne JR; Jochelson M; Hudis C; Morrow M; Ulaner GA
J Nucl Med; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1674-80. PubMed ID: 26294295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT predicts disease-free survival in patients with primary invasive ductal breast cancer.
Jo JE; Kim JY; Lee SH; Kim S; Kang T
Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1463-70. PubMed ID: 25406431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Elevated tumor-to-liver standardized uptake value ratio (TLR) from preoperative
Wu C; Cui Y; Zhao Y; Chen X; Liao X; Di L; Yin L; Liu M; Wang R
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 131():109218. PubMed ID: 32882538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic value of metabolic activity of the psoas muscle evaluated by preoperative
Kim K; Kim IJ; Pak K; Kang T; Seol YM; Choi YJ; Kim H
BMC Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(1):1151. PubMed ID: 34706697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Groheux D; Martineau A; Teixeira L; Espié M; de Cremoux P; Bertheau P; Merlet P; Lemarignier C
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 28057031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association between partial-volume corrected SUVmax and Oncotype DX recurrence score in early-stage, ER-positive/HER2-negative invasive breast cancer.
Lee SH; Ha S; An HJ; Lee JS; Han W; Im SA; Ryu HS; Kim WH; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK; Cheon GJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Aug; 43(9):1574-84. PubMed ID: 27209424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
