165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36600366)
1. Enhancing authenticity, diagnosticity and
Yeates P; Maluf A; Kinston R; Cope N; McCray G; Cullen K; O'Neill V; Cole A; Goodfellow R; Vallender R; Chung CW; McKinley RK; Fuller R; Wong G
BMJ Open; 2022 Dec; 12(12):e064387. PubMed ID: 36600366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using video-based examiner score comparison and adjustment (VESCA) to compare the influence of examiners at different sites in a distributed objective structured clinical exam (OSCE).
Yeates P; Maluf A; Cope N; McCray G; McBain S; Beardow D; Fuller R; McKinley RB
BMC Med Educ; 2023 Oct; 23(1):803. PubMed ID: 37885005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing a video-based method to compare and adjust examiner effects in fully nested OSCEs.
Yeates P; Cope N; Hawarden A; Bradshaw H; McCray G; Homer M
Med Educ; 2019 Mar; 53(3):250-263. PubMed ID: 30575092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determining the influence of different linking patterns on the stability of students' score adjustments produced using Video-based Examiner Score Comparison and Adjustment (VESCA).
Yeates P; McCray G; Moult A; Cope N; Fuller R; McKinley R
BMC Med Educ; 2022 Jan; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 35039023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Standardized examinees: development of a new tool to evaluate factors influencing OSCE scores and to train examiners.
Zimmermann P; Kadmon M
GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(4):Doc40. PubMed ID: 32685668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring the Effect of Examiner Variability in a Multiple-Circuit Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).
Yeates P; Moult A; Cope N; McCray G; Xilas E; Lovelock T; Vaughan N; Daw D; Fuller R; McKinley RKB
Acad Med; 2021 Aug; 96(8):1189-1196. PubMed ID: 33656012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using cultural historical activity theory to reflect on the sociocultural complexities in OSCE examiners' judgements.
Wong WYA; Thistlethwaite J; Moni K; Roberts C
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2023 Mar; 28(1):27-46. PubMed ID: 35943605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Examiners' Perceptions in Surgical Education: The Blind Spot in the Assessment of OSCEs.
van der Want AC; Bloemendaal PM; van der Hage JA
J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(2):590-596. PubMed ID: 32819870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sources of variation in performance on a shared OSCE station across four UK medical schools.
Chesser A; Cameron H; Evans P; Cleland J; Boursicot K; Mires G
Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 19493176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploring the introduction of entrustment rating scales in an existing objective structured clinical examination.
Holzhausen Y; Maaz A; März M; Sehy V; Peters H
BMC Med Educ; 2019 Aug; 19(1):319. PubMed ID: 31438938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hawks, Doves and Rasch decisions: Understanding the influence of different cycles of an OSCE on students' scores using Many Facet Rasch Modeling.
Yeates P; Sebok-Syer SS
Med Teach; 2017 Jan; 39(1):92-99. PubMed ID: 27897083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A realist evaluation of how, why and when objective structured clinical exams (OSCEs) are experienced as an authentic assessment of clinical preparedness.
Yeates P; Maluf A; Kinston R; Cope N; Cullen K; Cole A; O'Neill V; Chung CW; Goodfellow R; Vallender R; Ensaff S; Goddard-Fuller R; McKinley R; Wong G
Med Teach; 2024 Apr; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 38635469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Task Demands in OSCEs Influence Learning Strategies.
Lafleur A; Laflamme J; Leppink J; Côté L
Teach Learn Med; 2017; 29(3):286-295. PubMed ID: 28632013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and evaluation of a spiral model of assessing EBM competency using OSCEs in undergraduate medical education.
Kumaravel B; Stewart C; Ilic D
BMC Med Educ; 2021 Apr; 21(1):204. PubMed ID: 33838686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using the Many-Facet Rasch Model to analyse and evaluate the quality of objective structured clinical examination: a non-experimental cross-sectional design.
Tavakol M; Pinner G
BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e029208. PubMed ID: 31494607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing clinical reasoning in the OSCE: pilot-testing a novel oral debrief exercise.
Régent A; Thampy H; Singh M
BMC Med Educ; 2023 Oct; 23(1):718. PubMed ID: 37789308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influences of OSCE design on students' diagnostic reasoning.
Lafleur A; Côté L; Leppink J
Med Educ; 2015 Feb; 49(2):203-14. PubMed ID: 25626751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of virtual reality OSCE on nursing students' education: a study protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu P; Dong X; Liu F; Fu H
BMJ Open; 2024 May; 14(5):e082847. PubMed ID: 38806420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The efficacy of peer assessment in objective structured clinical examinations for formative feedback: a preliminary study.
Kim KJ; Kim G
Korean J Med Educ; 2020 Mar; 32(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 32130851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is There Variability in Scoring of Student Surgical OSCE Performance Based on Examiner Experience and Expertise?
Donohoe CL; Reilly F; Donnelly S; Cahill RA
J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(5):1202-1210. PubMed ID: 32336628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
