These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36601255)

  • 41. Utilizing response times in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing under the higher-order deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate model.
    Huang HY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):109-141. PubMed ID: 30793768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Linking Methods for the Zinnes-Griggs Pairwise Preference IRT Model.
    Lee P; Joo SH; Stark S
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Mar; 41(2):130-144. PubMed ID: 29881082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Diagnostic Classification Models for a Mixture of Ordered and Non-ordered Response Options in Rating Scales.
    Liu R; Liu H; Shi D; Jiang Z
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Oct; 46(7):622-639. PubMed ID: 36131839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An Adaptive Design for Item Parameter Online Estimation and Q-Matrix Online Calibration in CD-CAT.
    Wang W; Tu Y; Song L; Zheng J; Wang T
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():710497. PubMed ID: 34504460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Modification Indices for Diagnostic Classification Models.
    Brown C; Templin J
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(3):580-597. PubMed ID: 35507677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Patients' Preferences for Artificial Intelligence Applications Versus Clinicians in Disease Diagnosis During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in China: Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Liu T; Tsang W; Huang F; Lau OY; Chen Y; Sheng J; Guo Y; Akinwunmi B; Zhang CJ; Ming WK
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Feb; 23(2):e22841. PubMed ID: 33493130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Multidimensional IRT for forced choice tests: A literature review.
    Nie L; Xu P; Hu D
    Heliyon; 2024 Mar; 10(5):e26884. PubMed ID: 38449643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Effects of Q-Matrix Design on Classification Accuracy in the Log-Linear Cognitive Diagnosis Model.
    Madison MJ; Bradshaw LP
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Jun; 75(3):491-511. PubMed ID: 29795830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Determining the Number of Attributes in Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling.
    Nájera P; Abad FJ; Sorrel MA
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():614470. PubMed ID: 33658962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A joint modeling framework of responses and response times to assess learning outcomes.
    Wang S; Zhang S; Shen Y
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(1):49-68. PubMed ID: 31165632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A Family of Generalized Diagnostic Classification Models for Multiple Choice Option-Based Scoring.
    DiBello LV; Henson RA; Stout WF
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jan; 39(1):62-79. PubMed ID: 29880994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Direct Estimation of Diagnostic Classification Model Attribute Mastery Profiles via a Collapsed Gibbs Sampling Algorithm.
    Yamaguchi K; Templin J
    Psychometrika; 2022 Dec; 87(4):1390-1421. PubMed ID: 35426059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Structural Parameter Standard Error Estimation Method in Diagnostic Classification Models: Estimation and Application.
    Liu Y; Xin T; Jiang Y
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(5):784-803. PubMed ID: 34061682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Item Response Models for Forced-Choice Questionnaires: A Common Framework.
    Brown A
    Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):135-60. PubMed ID: 25663304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Using Response Times and Response Accuracy to Measure Fluency Within Cognitive Diagnosis Models.
    Wang S; Chen Y
    Psychometrika; 2020 Sep; 85(3):600-629. PubMed ID: 32816238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Though Forced, Still Valid: Examining the Psychometric Performance of Forced-Choice Measurement of Personality in Children and Adolescents.
    Li M; Zhang B; Mou Y
    Assessment; 2024 Jun; ():10731911241255841. PubMed ID: 38867477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Combining item response theory and diagnostic classification models: a psychometric model for scaling ability and diagnosing misconceptions.
    Bradshaw L; Templin J
    Psychometrika; 2014 Jul; 79(3):403-25. PubMed ID: 25205005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. autoFC: An R Package for Automatic Item Pairing in Forced-Choice Test Construction.
    Li M; Sun T; Zhang B
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Jan; 46(1):70-72. PubMed ID: 34898749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A Hierarchical Model for Accuracy and Choice on Standardized Tests.
    Culpepper SA; Balamuta JJ
    Psychometrika; 2015 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 26608961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A New Method to Balance Measurement Accuracy and Attribute Coverage in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Sun X; Andersson B; Xin T
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Oct; 45(7-8):463-476. PubMed ID: 34866707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.