These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36601911)

  • 1. A member of the claudin superfamily influences formation of the front domain in pheromone-responding yeast cells.
    Sukumar M; DeFlorio R; Pai CY; Stone DE
    J Cell Sci; 2023 Jan; 136(2):. PubMed ID: 36601911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gβ promotes pheromone receptor polarization and yeast chemotropism by inhibiting receptor phosphorylation.
    Ismael A; Tian W; Waszczak N; Wang X; Cao Y; Suchkov D; Bar E; Metodiev MV; Liang J; Arkowitz RA; Stone DE
    Sci Signal; 2016 Apr; 9(423):ra38. PubMed ID: 27072657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mating yeast cells use an intrinsic polarity site to assemble a pheromone-gradient tracking machine.
    Wang X; Tian W; Banh BT; Statler BM; Liang J; Stone DE
    J Cell Biol; 2019 Nov; 218(11):3730-3752. PubMed ID: 31570500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Predictive Model for Yeast Cell Polarization in Pheromone Gradients.
    Muller N; Piel M; Calvez V; Voituriez R; Gonçalves-Sá J; Guo CL; Jiang X; Murray A; Meunier N
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Apr; 12(4):e1004795. PubMed ID: 27077831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gradient tracking in mating yeast depends on Bud1 inactivation and actin-independent vesicle delivery.
    Wang X; Pai CY; Stone DE
    J Cell Biol; 2022 Dec; 221(12):. PubMed ID: 36156058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chemotropism during yeast mating.
    Follette PJ; Arkowitz RA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 571():99-110. PubMed ID: 19763961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Polarization of the yeast pheromone receptor requires its internalization but not actin-dependent secretion.
    Suchkov DV; DeFlorio R; Draper E; Ismael A; Sukumar M; Arkowitz R; Stone DE
    Mol Biol Cell; 2010 May; 21(10):1737-52. PubMed ID: 20335504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanism of commitment to a mating partner in
    Jacobs KC; Gorman O; Lew DJ
    Mol Biol Cell; 2022 Oct; 33(12):ar112. PubMed ID: 35947501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells execute a default pathway to select a mate in the absence of pheromone gradients.
    Dorer R; Pryciak PM; Hartwell LH
    J Cell Biol; 1995 Nov; 131(4):845-61. PubMed ID: 7490289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of Polarized G Protein Signaling in Tracking Pheromone Gradients.
    McClure AW; Minakova M; Dyer JM; Zyla TR; Elston TC; Lew DJ
    Dev Cell; 2015 Nov; 35(4):471-82. PubMed ID: 26609960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chemotactic movement of a polarity site enables yeast cells to find their mates.
    Ghose D; Jacobs K; Ramirez S; Elston T; Lew D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jun; 118(22):. PubMed ID: 34050026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic definition of protein constituents along the major polarization axis reveals an adaptive reuse of the polarization machinery in pheromone-treated budding yeast.
    Narayanaswamy R; Moradi EK; Niu W; Hart GT; Davis M; McGary KL; Ellington AD; Marcotte EM
    J Proteome Res; 2009 Jan; 8(1):6-19. PubMed ID: 19053807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pheromone Guidance of Polarity Site Movement in Yeast.
    Jacobs KC; Lew DJ
    Biomolecules; 2022 Mar; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 35454091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The roles of yeast formins and their regulators Bud6 and Bil2 in the pheromone response.
    Magliozzi JO; Rands TJ; Shrestha S; Simke WC; Hase NE; Juanes MA; Kelley JB; Goode BL
    Mol Biol Cell; 2024 Jun; 35(6):ar85. PubMed ID: 38656798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mitotic and pheromone-specific intrinsic polarization cues interfere with gradient sensing in
    Vasen G; Dunayevich P; Colman-Lerner A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Mar; 117(12):6580-6589. PubMed ID: 32152126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pheromone-induced polarization is dependent on the Fus3p MAPK acting through the formin Bni1p.
    Matheos D; Metodiev M; Muller E; Stone D; Rose MD
    J Cell Biol; 2004 Apr; 165(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 15067022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scp160-dependent mRNA trafficking mediates pheromone gradient sensing and chemotropism in yeast.
    Gelin-Licht R; Paliwal S; Conlon P; Levchenko A; Gerst JE
    Cell Rep; 2012 May; 1(5):483-94. PubMed ID: 22832273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phosphorylated Gβ is a directional cue during yeast gradient tracking.
    Abdul-Ganiyu R; Venegas LA; Wang X; Puerner C; Arkowitz RA; Kay BK; Stone DE
    Sci Signal; 2021 May; 14(682):. PubMed ID: 33975981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A microfluidic device that forms and redirects pheromone gradients to study chemotropism in yeast.
    Brett ME; DeFlorio R; Stone DE; Eddington DT
    Lab Chip; 2012 Sep; 12(17):3127-34. PubMed ID: 22760670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Particle-based simulations reveal two positive feedback loops allow relocation and stabilization of the polarity site during yeast mating.
    Guan K; Curtis ER; Lew DJ; Elston TC
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Oct; 19(10):e1011523. PubMed ID: 37782676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.