BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36602080)

  • 1. Gradient Tree Boosting for Hierarchical Data.
    Salditt M; Humberg S; Nestler S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(5):911-937. PubMed ID: 36602080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?
    Anderson AB; Grazal CF; Balazs GC; Potter BK; Dickens JF; Forsberg JA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):0-1618. PubMed ID: 32282466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utilizing machine learning algorithms to predict subject genetic mutation class from in silico models of neuronal networks.
    Kress GT; Chan F; Garcia CA; Merrifield WS
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Nov; 22(1):290. PubMed ID: 36352381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Machine Learning Hybrid Model for the Prediction of Chronic Kidney Disease.
    Khalid H; Khan A; Zahid Khan M; Mehmood G; Shuaib Qureshi M
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2023; 2023():9266889. PubMed ID: 36959840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genome-wide prediction of discrete traits using Bayesian regressions and machine learning.
    González-Recio O; Forni S
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Feb; 43(1):7. PubMed ID: 21329522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classification of imbalanced data using machine learning algorithms to predict the risk of renal graft failures in Ethiopia.
    Mulugeta G; Zewotir T; Tegegne AS; Juhar LH; Muleta MB
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 May; 23(1):98. PubMed ID: 37217892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Building more accurate decision trees with the additive tree.
    Luna JM; Gennatas ED; Ungar LH; Eaton E; Diffenderfer ES; Jensen ST; Simone CB; Friedman JH; Solberg TD; Valdes G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Oct; 116(40):19887-19893. PubMed ID: 31527280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An extensive experimental survey of regression methods.
    Fernández-Delgado M; Sirsat MS; Cernadas E; Alawadi S; Barro S; Febrero-Bande M
    Neural Netw; 2019 Mar; 111():11-34. PubMed ID: 30654138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Building Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Models Using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees.
    Feng D; Svetnik V; Liaw A; Pratola M; Sheridan RP
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2642-2655. PubMed ID: 30998343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers.
    Deist TM; Dankers FJWM; Valdes G; Wijsman R; Hsu IC; Oberije C; Lustberg T; van Soest J; Hoebers F; Jochems A; El Naqa I; Wee L; Morin O; Raleigh DR; Bots W; Kaanders JH; Belderbos J; Kwint M; Solberg T; Monshouwer R; Bussink J; Dekker A; Lambin P
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3449-3459. PubMed ID: 29763967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting daily outcomes in acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure patients with machine learning techniques.
    Speiser JL; Karvellas CJ; Wolf BJ; Chung D; Koch DG; Durkalski VL
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jul; 175():111-120. PubMed ID: 31104700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of machine learning and Bayesian modelling for molecular serotyping.
    Newton R; Wernisch L
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Aug; 18(1):606. PubMed ID: 28800724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robust machine learning algorithms for predicting coastal water quality index.
    Uddin MG; Nash S; Mahammad Diganta MT; Rahman A; Olbert AI
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Nov; 321():115923. PubMed ID: 35988401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploratory Data Mining Techniques (Decision Tree Models) for Examining the Impact of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Tinnitus: Machine Learning Approach.
    Rodrigo H; Beukes EW; Andersson G; Manchaiah V
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Nov; 23(11):e28999. PubMed ID: 34726612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gradient boosting for linear mixed models.
    Griesbach C; Säfken B; Waldmann E
    Int J Biostat; 2021 Jan; 17(2):317-329. PubMed ID: 34826371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and validation of predictive models for unplanned hospitalization in the Basque Country: analyzing the variability of non-deterministic algorithms.
    Olza A; Millán E; Rodríguez-Álvarez MX
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Aug; 23(1):152. PubMed ID: 37543596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Machine Learning-Based Classification of Lignocellulosic Biomass from Pyrolysis-Molecular Beam Mass Spectrometry Data.
    Nag A; Gerritsen A; Doeppke C; Harman-Ware AE
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Apr; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 33921121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Identification Using Different Machine Learning Algorithms and Radiomics.
    Yang B; Li W; Wu X; Zhong W; Wang J; Zhou Y; Huang T; Zhou L; Zhou Z
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Aug; 13(16):. PubMed ID: 37627886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Value of machine learning algorithms for predicting diabetes risk: A subset analysis from a real-world retrospective cohort study.
    Mao Y; Zhu Z; Pan S; Lin W; Liang J; Huang H; Li L; Wen J; Chen G
    J Diabetes Investig; 2023 Feb; 14(2):309-320. PubMed ID: 36345236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variable selection with missing data in both covariates and outcomes: Imputation and machine learning.
    Hu L; Joyce Lin JY; Ji J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Dec; 30(12):2651-2671. PubMed ID: 34696650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.