These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36602873)

  • 1. Adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis via inverse probability weighting using clinical trial registries.
    Huang A; Morikawa K; Friede T; Hattori S
    Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2089-2102. PubMed ID: 36602873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using clinical trial registries to inform Copas selection model for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Huang A; Komukai S; Friede T; Hattori S
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Sep; 12(5):658-673. PubMed ID: 34169657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The trim-and-fill method for publication bias: practical guidelines and recommendations based on a large database of meta-analyses.
    Shi L; Lin L
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(23):e15987. PubMed ID: 31169736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detecting and correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis - A truncated normal distribution approach.
    Zhu Q; Carriere KC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2722-2741. PubMed ID: 28024447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Data-Adaptive Selection of the Propensity Score Truncation Level for Inverse-Probability-Weighted and Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimators of Marginal Point Treatment Effects.
    Gruber S; Phillips RV; Lee H; van der Laan MJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2022 Aug; 191(9):1640-1651. PubMed ID: 35512316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses.
    Sutton AJ; Duval SJ; Tweedie RL; Abrams KR; Jones DR
    BMJ; 2000 Jun; 320(7249):1574-7. PubMed ID: 10845965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Duval S; Tweedie R
    Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):455-63. PubMed ID: 10877304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extent of non-publication in cohorts of studies approved by research ethics committees or included in trial registries.
    Schmucker C; Schell LK; Portalupi S; Oeller P; Cabrera L; Bassler D; Schwarzer G; Scherer RW; Antes G; von Elm E; Meerpohl JJ;
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114023. PubMed ID: 25536072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2969-83. PubMed ID: 20963748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian "fill-in" method for correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Du H; Liu F; Wang L
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Dec; 22(4):799-817. PubMed ID: 29265851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Atakpo P; Vassar M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2016 May; 82(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 26925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis.
    Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Rücker G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 19836925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A confidence interval robust to publication bias for random-effects meta-analysis of few studies.
    Henmi M; Hattori S; Friede T
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Sep; 12(5):674-679. PubMed ID: 33576574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
    Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SAMURAI: Sensitivity analysis of a meta-analysis with unpublished but registered analytical investigations (software).
    Kim NY; Bangdiwala SI; Thaler K; Gartlehner G
    Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; 3():27. PubMed ID: 24641974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Publication bias in meta-analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
    Kicinski M; Springate DA; Kontopantelis E
    Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(20):2781-93. PubMed ID: 25988604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.