141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36602883)
1. Evaluation of the R-One robotic system for percutaneous coronary intervention: the R-EVOLUTION study.
Durand E; Sabatier R; Smits PC; Verheye S; Pereira B; Fajadet J
EuroIntervention; 2023 Apr; 18(16):e1339-e1347. PubMed ID: 36602883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions: Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
Mahmud E; Naghi J; Ang L; Harrison J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jul; 10(13):1320-1327. PubMed ID: 28683937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Reasons for partial manual assistance or manual conversion.
Harrison J; Ang L; Naghi J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Patel MP; Reeves RR; Mahmud E
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Jul; 19(5 Pt A):526-531. PubMed ID: 29221959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study.
Weisz G; Metzger DC; Caputo RP; Delgado JA; Marshall JJ; Vetrovec GW; Reisman M; Waksman R; Granada JF; Novack V; Moses JW; Carrozza JP
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 61(15):1596-600. PubMed ID: 23500318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center.
Kagiyama K; Mitsutake Y; Ueno T; Sakai S; Nakamura T; Yamaji K; Ishimatsu T; Sasaki M; Chibana H; Itaya N; Sasaki KI; Fukumoto Y
Heart Vessels; 2021 Jul; 36(7):955-964. PubMed ID: 33502572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic-Assisted PCI: The Future of Coronary Intervention?
Stevenson A; Kirresh A; Ahmad M; Candilio L
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Feb; 35():161-168. PubMed ID: 33867293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First-in-human evaluation of a novel robotic-assisted coronary angioplasty system.
Granada JF; Delgado JA; Uribe MP; Fernandez A; Blanco G; Leon MB; Weisz G
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Apr; 4(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 21511227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Initial Australian Experience.
Leung J; French J; Xu J; Kachwalla H; Kaddapu K; Badie T; Mussap C; Rajaratnam R; Leung D; Lo S; Juergens C
Heart Lung Circ; 2024 Apr; 33(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 38365501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical and technical outcomes of robotic versus manual percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jaffar-Karballai M; Haque A; Voller C; Elleithy A; Harky A
J Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 80(6):495-504. PubMed ID: 35165012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report.
Smitson CC; Ang L; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M; Mahmud E
J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 30(4):152-156. PubMed ID: 29335386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation of Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Into a High-Risk PCI Program.
Chitturi KR; Kanake S; Nguyen T; Loc B; Baden K; Bavishi C; Kumar A; Liu Z; Chan A; Karuparthi PR; Hirai T
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Oct; 43():115-119. PubMed ID: 35610138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Periprocedural and 30-day outcomes of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention used in the intravascular imaging guidance.
Koeda Y; Ishida M; Sasaki K; Kikuchi S; Yamaya S; Tsuji K; Ishisone T; Goto I; Kimura T; Shimoda Y; Doi A; Morino Y
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2023 Jan; 38(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 35511339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.
Naganuma T; Chieffo A; Meliga E; Capodanno D; Park SJ; Onuma Y; Valgimigli M; Jegere S; Makkar RR; Palacios IF; Costopoulos C; Kim YH; Buszman PP; Chakravarty T; Sheiban I; Mehran R; Naber C; Margey R; Agnihotri A; Marra S; Capranzano P; Leon MB; Moses JW; Fajadet J; Lefevre T; Morice MC; Erglis A; Tamburino C; Alfieri O; Serruys PW; Colombo A
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Dec; 6(12):1242-9. PubMed ID: 24355114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic-Enhanced PCI Compared to the Traditional Manual Approach.
Smilowitz NR; Moses JW; Sosa FA; Lerman B; Qureshi Y; Dalton KE; Privitera LT; Canone-Weber D; Singh V; Leon MB; Weisz G
J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 Jul; 26(7):318-21. PubMed ID: 24993988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Establishing a robotic-assisted PCI program: experiences at a large tertiary referral center.
Brunner FJ; Waldeyer C; Zengin-Sahm E; Kondziella C; Schrage B; Clemmensen P; Westermann D; Blankenberg S; Seiffert M
Heart Vessels; 2022 Oct; 37(10):1669-1678. PubMed ID: 35487996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Resource Utilization During Elective Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Mangels D; Fregoso A; Ang L; Mahmud E
J Invasive Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 32(12):E321-E325. PubMed ID: 32829309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. First-in-human robotic percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main stenosis.
Mahmud E; Dominguez A; Bahadorani J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Oct; 88(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 27189238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention During COVID-19 Pandemic: Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness With Procedural Distancing.
Sooknanan NN; Memon S; George JC
J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 34(2):E87-E91. PubMed ID: 34928816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and feasibility of robotic assisted percutaneous coronary intervention compared to standard percutaneous coronary intervention- a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tripathi B; Sharma P; Arora S; Murtaza M; Singh A; Solanki D; Kapadia S; Sharma A; Pershad A
Indian Heart J; 2021; 73(5):549-554. PubMed ID: 34627567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.
Ali ZA; Maehara A; Généreux P; Shlofmitz RA; Fabbiocchi F; Nazif TM; Guagliumi G; Meraj PM; Alfonso F; Samady H; Akasaka T; Carlson EB; Leesar MA; Matsumura M; Ozan MO; Mintz GS; Ben-Yehuda O; Stone GW;
Lancet; 2016 Nov; 388(10060):2618-2628. PubMed ID: 27806900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
