196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36603000)
1. Playback of broadband vocalizations of female mice suppresses male ultrasonic calls.
Hood KE; Long E; Navarro E; Hurley LM
PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0273742. PubMed ID: 36603000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Studying Socio-Affective Communication in Rats through Playback of Ultrasonic Vocalizations.
Wöhr M; Seffer D; Schwarting RK
Curr Protoc Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 75():8.35.1-8.35.17. PubMed ID: 27063787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Listening to your partner: serotonin increases male responsiveness to female vocal signals in mice.
Hood KE; Hurley LM
Front Hum Neurosci; 2023; 17():1304653. PubMed ID: 38328678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attraction of female house mice to male ultrasonic courtship vocalizations depends on their social experience and estrous stage.
Beck J; Wernisch B; Klaus T; Penn DJ; Zala SM
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0285642. PubMed ID: 37816035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pro-social ultrasonic communication in rats: insights from playback studies.
Seffer D; Schwarting RK; Wöhr M
J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Aug; 234():73-81. PubMed ID: 24508146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of playback of 22-kHz and 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations on rat behaviors assessed with a modified open-field test.
Inagaki H; Ushida T
Physiol Behav; 2021 Feb; 229():113251. PubMed ID: 33220328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 5-HT1A Receptors Alter Temporal Responses to Broadband Vocalizations in the Mouse Inferior Colliculus Through Response Suppression.
Gentile Polese A; Nigam S; Hurley LM
Front Neural Circuits; 2021; 15():718348. PubMed ID: 34512276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Testing social acoustic memory in rats: effects of stimulus configuration and long-term memory on the induction of social approach behavior by appetitive 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations.
Wöhr M; Schwarting RK
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2012 Sep; 98(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 22677211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physiological and Behavioral Responses to Vocalization Playback in Mice.
Niemczura AC; Grimsley JM; Kim C; Alkhawaga A; Poth A; Carvalho A; Wenstrup JJ
Front Behav Neurosci; 2020; 14():155. PubMed ID: 33033474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 22 kHz and 55 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations differentially influence neural and behavioral outcomes: Implications for modeling anxiety via auditory stimuli in the rat.
Demaestri C; Brenhouse HC; Honeycutt JA
Behav Brain Res; 2019 Mar; 360():134-145. PubMed ID: 30521931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phasic dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens in response to pro-social 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in rats.
Willuhn I; Tose A; Wanat MJ; Hart AS; Hollon NG; Phillips PE; Schwarting RK; Wöhr M
J Neurosci; 2014 Aug; 34(32):10616-23. PubMed ID: 25100595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasonic vocalizations induced by sex and amphetamine in M2, M4, M5 muscarinic and D2 dopamine receptor knockout mice.
Wang H; Liang S; Burgdorf J; Wess J; Yeomans J
PLoS One; 2008 Apr; 3(4):e1893. PubMed ID: 18382674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spectrographic analyses reveal signals of individuality and kinship in the ultrasonic courtship vocalizations of wild house mice.
Hoffmann F; Musolf K; Penn DJ
Physiol Behav; 2012 Feb; 105(3):766-71. PubMed ID: 22037196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Decreased approach behavior and nucleus accumbens immediate early gene expression in response to Parkinsonian ultrasonic vocalizations in rats.
Pultorak JD; Kelm-Nelson CA; Holt LR; Blue KV; Ciucci MR; Johnson AM
Soc Neurosci; 2016; 11(4):365-79. PubMed ID: 26313334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Social isolation produces no effect on ultrasonic vocalization production in adult female CBA/CaJ mice.
Screven LA; Dent ML
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213068. PubMed ID: 30835741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A role for strain differences in waveforms of ultrasonic vocalizations during male-female interaction.
Sugimoto H; Okabe S; Kato M; Koshida N; Shiroishi T; Mogi K; Kikusui T; Koide T
PLoS One; 2011; 6(7):e22093. PubMed ID: 21818297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The temporal organization of mouse ultrasonic vocalizations.
Castellucci GA; Calbick D; McCormick D
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0199929. PubMed ID: 30376572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Mouse Inferior Colliculus Responds Preferentially to Non-Ultrasonic Vocalizations.
Tehrani M; Shanbhag S; Huyck JJ; Patel R; Kazimierski D; Wenstrup JJ
eNeuro; 2024 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 38514192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CBA/CaJ mouse ultrasonic vocalizations depend on prior social experience.
Burke K; Screven LA; Dent ML
PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0197774. PubMed ID: 29874248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The structure and usage of female and male mouse ultrasonic vocalizations reveal only minor differences.
Hammerschmidt K; Radyushkin K; Ehrenreich H; Fischer J
PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e41133. PubMed ID: 22815941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
