These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36603846)
1. ChemFlow─From 2D Chemical Libraries to Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energies. Barreto Gomes DE; Galentino K; Sisquellas M; Monari L; Bouysset C; Cecchini M J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Jan; 63(2):407-411. PubMed ID: 36603846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of relative free energies of binding using pre-computed ensembles based on the single-step free energy perturbation and the site-identification by Ligand competitive saturation approaches. Raman EP; Lakkaraju SK; Denny RA; MacKerell AD J Comput Chem; 2017 Jun; 38(15):1238-1251. PubMed ID: 27782307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations. Wang B; Li L; Hurley TD; Meroueh SO J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2659-70. PubMed ID: 24032517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3. He X; Man VH; Ji B; Xie XQ; Wang J J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):105-117. PubMed ID: 30218199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations with FEP. Wang L; Chambers J; Abel R Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():201-232. PubMed ID: 31396905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Absolute Alchemical Free Energy Calculations for Ligand Binding: A Beginner's Guide. Aldeghi M; Bluck JP; Biggin PC Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():199-232. PubMed ID: 29594774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA. Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ChemFlow_py: a flexible toolkit for docking and rescoring. Monari L; Galentino K; Cecchini M J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2023 Nov; 37(11):565-572. PubMed ID: 37620503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identifying and Overcoming the Sampling Challenges in Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations of a Model Protein:Protein Complex. Zhang I; Rufa DA; Pulido I; Henry MM; Rosen LE; Hauser K; Singh S; Chodera JD J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Aug; 19(15):4863-4882. PubMed ID: 37450482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015. Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficient Approximation of Ligand Rotational and Translational Entropy Changes upon Binding for Use in MM-PBSA Calculations. Ben-Shalom IY; Pfeiffer-Marek S; Baringhaus KH; Gohlke H J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Feb; 57(2):170-189. PubMed ID: 27996253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accurate determination of protein:ligand standard binding free energies from molecular dynamics simulations. Fu H; Chen H; Blazhynska M; Goulard Coderc de Lacam E; Szczepaniak F; Pavlova A; Shao X; Gumbart JC; Dehez F; Roux B; Cai W; Chipot C Nat Protoc; 2022 Apr; 17(4):1114-1141. PubMed ID: 35277695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of novel PI3Kδ inhibitors by docking, ADMET prediction and molecular dynamics simulations. Liu YY; Feng XY; Jia WQ; Jing Z; Xu WR; Cheng XC Comput Biol Chem; 2019 Feb; 78():190-204. PubMed ID: 30557817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. D3R Grand Challenge 4: ligand similarity and MM-GBSA-based pose prediction and affinity ranking for BACE-1 inhibitors. Sasmal S; El Khoury L; Mobley DL J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Feb; 34(2):163-177. PubMed ID: 31781990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computation of binding energies including their enthalpy and entropy components for protein-ligand complexes using support vector machines. Koppisetty CA; Frank M; Kemp GJ; Nyholm PG J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2559-70. PubMed ID: 24050538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PopShift: A Thermodynamically Sound Approach to Estimate Binding Free Energies by Accounting for Ligand-Induced Population Shifts from a Ligand-Free Markov State Model. Smith LG; Novak B; Osato M; Mobley DL; Bowman GR J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Feb; 20(3):1036-1050. PubMed ID: 38291966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated, Accurate, and Scalable Relative Protein-Ligand Binding Free-Energy Calculations Using Lambda Dynamics. Raman EP; Paul TJ; Hayes RL; Brooks CL J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Dec; 16(12):7895-7914. PubMed ID: 33201701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of simulation time in predicting binding free energies using end-point approaches. Sokouti B; Dastmalchi S; Hamzeh-Mivehroud M J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2022 Oct; 20(5):2250024. PubMed ID: 36350600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How to deal with multiple binding poses in alchemical relative protein-ligand binding free energy calculations. Kaus JW; Harder E; Lin T; Abel R; McCammon JA; Wang L J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jun; 11(6):2670-9. PubMed ID: 26085821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]