BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36604197)

  • 1. Relationships are the key to a successful publicly funded homebirth program, a qualitative study.
    Sweet L; O'Driscoll K; Blums T; Sommeling M; Kolar R; Teale G; Wynter K
    Women Birth; 2023 Jul; 36(4):377-384. PubMed ID: 36604197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From hospital to home: Australian midwives' experiences of transitioning into publicly-funded homebirth programs.
    Coddington R; Catling C; Homer CS
    Women Birth; 2017 Feb; 30(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 27594344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Getting kicked off the program: Women's experiences of antenatal exclusion from publicly-funded homebirth in Australia.
    Coddington R; Fox D; Scarf V; Catling C
    Women Birth; 2023 Feb; 36(1):e179-e185. PubMed ID: 35764492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Under scrutiny: Midwives' experience of intrapartum transfer from home to hospital within the context of a planned homebirth in Western Australia.
    Ball C; Hauck Y; Kuliukas L; Lewis L; Doherty D
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2016 Jun; 8():88-93. PubMed ID: 27179383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Publicly-funded home birth in Victoria, Australia: Exploring the views and experiences of midwives and doctors.
    McLachlan H; McKay H; Powell R; Small R; Davey MA; Cullinane F; Newton M; Forster D
    Midwifery; 2016 Apr; 35():24-30. PubMed ID: 27060397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Seeing birth in a new light: The transformational effect of exposure to homebirth for hospital-based midwives.
    Coddington R; Catling C; Homer C
    Midwifery; 2020 Sep; 88():102755. PubMed ID: 32497819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Publicly-funded homebirth models in Australia.
    Catling-Paull C; Foureur MJ; Homer CS
    Women Birth; 2012 Dec; 25(4):152-8. PubMed ID: 22104264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Women's views and experiences of publicly-funded homebirth programs in Victoria, Australia: A cross-sectional survey.
    Forster DA; McKay H; Davey MA; Small R; Cullinane F; Newton M; Powell R; McLachlan HL
    Women Birth; 2019 Jun; 32(3):221-230. PubMed ID: 30104172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiparous women's confidence to have a publicly-funded homebirth: a qualitative study.
    Catling-Paull C; Dahlen H; Homer CS
    Women Birth; 2011 Sep; 24(3):122-8. PubMed ID: 20943450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ten years of a publicly funded homebirth service in Victoria: Maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Sweet L; Wynter K; O'Driscoll K; Blums T; Nenke A; Sommeling M; Kolar R; Teale G
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Oct; 62(5):664-673. PubMed ID: 35318640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An exploratory study of women and midwives' perceptions of environmental waste management - homebirth as climate action.
    Paxton TK; Donnellan-Fernandez R; Hastie C
    Midwifery; 2023 Dec; 127():103844. PubMed ID: 37918131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Women's reasons and perceptions around planning a homebirth with a registered midwife in Western Australia.
    Hauck Y; Nathan E; Ball C; Hutchinson M; Somerville S; Hornbuckle J; Doherty D
    Women Birth; 2020 Feb; 33(1):e39-e47. PubMed ID: 30528817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Birthplace in Australia: Processes and interactions during the intrapartum transfer of women from planned homebirth to hospital.
    Fox D; Sheehan A; Homer C
    Midwifery; 2018 Feb; 57():18-25. PubMed ID: 29144977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Midwives' experiences of father participation in maternity care at a large metropolitan health service in Australia.
    Wynter K; Di Manno L; Watkins V; Rasmussen B; Macdonald JA
    Midwifery; 2021 Oct; 101():103046. PubMed ID: 34098224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for publicly-funded homebirth in Australia: A scoping review.
    Blums T; Donnellan-Fernandez R; Sweet L
    Women Birth; 2022 Feb; 35(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 33541812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why do women choose homebirth in Australia? A national survey.
    Sassine H; Burns E; Ormsby S; Dahlen HG
    Women Birth; 2021 Jul; 34(4):396-404. PubMed ID: 32636161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring midwives' perception of confidence around facilitating water birth in Western Australia: A qualitative descriptive study.
    Nicholls S; Hauck YL; Bayes S; Butt J
    Midwifery; 2016 Feb; 33():73-81. PubMed ID: 26549568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Home birth and the National Australian Maternity Services Review: too hot to handle?
    Dahlen H; Schmied V; Tracy SK; Jackson M; Cummings J; Priddis H
    Women Birth; 2011 Dec; 24(4):148-55. PubMed ID: 21074508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The St. George Homebirth Program: an evaluation of the first 100 booked women.
    McMurtrie J; Catling-Paull C; Teate A; Caplice S; Chapman M; Homer C
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Dec; 49(6):631-6. PubMed ID: 20070712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of an in-situ simulation workshop on home birth practice in Australia.
    Kumar A; Wallace EM; Smith C; Nestel D
    Women Birth; 2019 Aug; 32(4):346-355. PubMed ID: 30220576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.