These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36604950)

  • 1. Validation of an EGSnrc-based Monte Carlo model for a complex 2D-array for technical QA measurements of a linear accelerator.
    Czarnecki D; Zink K; Alissa M; Flatten V; Espelage T; Schoenfeld AA
    Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2552-2559. PubMed ID: 36604950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Output correction factors for nine small field detectors in 6 MV radiation therapy photon beams: a PENELOPE Monte Carlo study.
    Benmakhlouf H; Sempau J; Andreo P
    Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041711. PubMed ID: 24694131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monte Carlo-based investigations on the impact of removing the flattening filter on beam quality specifiers for photon beam dosimetry.
    Czarnecki D; Poppe B; Zink K
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2569-2580. PubMed ID: 28369978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental and Monte Carlo-based determination of the beam quality specifier for TomoTherapyHD treatment units.
    Howitz S; Schwedas M; Wiezorek T; Zink K
    Z Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 28(2):142-149. PubMed ID: 29031915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental and Monte Carlo-based determination of magnetic field correction factors
    Alissa M; Zink K; Kapsch RP; Schoenfeld AA; Frick S; Czarnecki D
    Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4578-4589. PubMed ID: 36897832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monte carlo electron source model validation for an Elekta Precise linac.
    Ali OA; Willemse CA; Shaw W; O'Reilly FH; du Plessis FC
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2366-73. PubMed ID: 21776771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining tissue-phantom ratios to provide a beam-quality specifier for flattening filter free photon beams.
    Dalaryd M; Knöös T; Ceberg C
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111716. PubMed ID: 25370630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benchmarking of Monte Carlo model of Siemens Oncor® linear accelerator for 18MV photon beam: Determination of initial electron beam parameters.
    Najafzadeh M; Hoseini-Ghafarokhi M; Bolagh RSM; Haghparast M; Zarifi S; Nickfarjam A; Farhood B; Chow JCL
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(6):1047-1070. PubMed ID: 31498147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of the initial beam parameters in Monte Carlo linac simulation.
    Aljarrah K; Sharp GC; Neicu T; Jiang SB
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):850-8. PubMed ID: 16696460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo linear accelerator simulation of megavoltage photon beams: independent determination of initial beam parameters.
    Almberg SS; Frengen J; Kylling A; Lindmo T
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 22225273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for two cylindrical ionization chambers in photon beams.
    Alissa M; Zink K; Tessier F; Schoenfeld AA; Czarnecki D
    Phys Med; 2022 Feb; 94():17-23. PubMed ID: 34972070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. VMAT and IMRT plan-specific correction factors for linac-based ionization chamber dosimetry.
    Desai VK; Labby ZE; Hyun MA; DeWerd LA; Culberson WS
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):913-924. PubMed ID: 30449040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo modeling and simulations of the High Definition (HD120) micro MLC and validation against measurements for a 6 MV beam.
    Borges C; Zarza-Moreno M; Heath E; Teixeira N; Vaz P
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):415-23. PubMed ID: 22225311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.
    Ahmad M; Deng J; Lund MW; Chen Z; Kimmett J; Moran MS; Nath R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 19098353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electron beam treatment verification using measured and Monte Carlo predicted portal images.
    Jarry G; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):4977-94. PubMed ID: 16237235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo calculated correction factors for diodes and ion chambers in small photon fields.
    Czarnecki D; Zink K
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(8):2431-44. PubMed ID: 23514734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo study of ionization chamber magnetic field correction factors as a function of angle and beam quality.
    Malkov VN; Rogers DWO
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):908-925. PubMed ID: 29218730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are neutrons responsible for the dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the build-up region for a high-energy photon beam?
    Ding GX; Duzenli C; Kalach NI
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3251-61. PubMed ID: 12361221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and validation of a 1.5 T MR-Linac full accelerator head and cryostat model for Monte Carlo dose simulations.
    Friedel M; Nachbar M; Mönnich D; Dohm O; Thorwarth D
    Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5304-5313. PubMed ID: 31532829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.