These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36605415)
1. Intermittent brain network reconfigurations and the resistance to social media influence. Lima Dias Pinto I; Rungratsameetaweemana N; Flaherty K; Periyannan A; Meghdadi A; Richard C; Berka C; Bansal K; Garcia JO Netw Neurosci; 2022 Jul; 6(3):870-896. PubMed ID: 36605415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reconfigurations within resonating communities of brain regions following TMS reveal different scales of processing. Garcia JO; Ashourvan A; Thurman SM; Srinivasan R; Bassett DS; Vettel JM Netw Neurosci; 2020; 4(3):611-636. PubMed ID: 32885118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamics of social influence on consumption choices: A social network representation. Shah SS; Asghar Z Heliyon; 2023 Jun; 9(6):e17146. PubMed ID: 37389035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling, simulation, and case analysis of COVID-19 over network public opinion formation with individual internal factors and external information characteristics. Chen T; Peng L; Yang J; Cong G Concurr Comput; 2021 Sep; 33(17):e6201. PubMed ID: 33786029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conformist social learning leads to self-organised prevention against adverse bias in risky decision making. Toyokawa W; Gaissmaier W Elife; 2022 May; 11():. PubMed ID: 35535494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Opinion dynamics on interacting networks: media competition and social influence. Quattrociocchi W; Caldarelli G; Scala A Sci Rep; 2014 May; 4():4938. PubMed ID: 24861995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The persuasion context and results in online opinion seeking: effects of message and source-the moderating role of network managers. Cabezudo RS; Izquierdo CC; Pinto JR Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2013 Nov; 16(11):828-35. PubMed ID: 23790357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mass media impact on opinion evolution in biased digital environments: a bounded confidence model. Pansanella V; Sîrbu A; Kertesz J; Rossetti G Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):14600. PubMed ID: 37670041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling and analyzing an opinion network dynamics considering the environmental factor. Yin F; Wang J; Jiang X; Huang Y; Yang Q; Wu J Math Biosci Eng; 2023 Aug; 20(9):16866-16885. PubMed ID: 37920038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of algorithmic bias and network structure on coexistence, consensus, and polarization of opinions. Peralta AF; Neri M; Kertész J; Iñiguez G Phys Rev E; 2021 Oct; 104(4-1):044312. PubMed ID: 34781537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Opinion evolution in different social acquaintance networks. Chen X; Zhang X; Wu Z; Wang H; Wang G; Li W Chaos; 2017 Nov; 27(11):113111. PubMed ID: 29195305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Opinion formation on social media: an empirical approach. Xiong F; Liu Y Chaos; 2014 Mar; 24(1):013130. PubMed ID: 24697392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sharing is caring: How sharing opinions online can connect people into groups and foster identification. O'Reilly C; Maher PJ; Lüders A; Quayle M Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Oct; 230():103751. PubMed ID: 36154987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross-platform opinion dynamics in competitive travel advertising: A coupled networks' insight. Chen J; Wang H; Chao X Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1003242. PubMed ID: 36389514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Population attitudes toward contraceptive methods over time on a social media platform. Merz AA; Gutiérrez-Sacristán A; Bartz D; Williams NE; Ojo A; Schaefer KM; Huang M; Li CY; Sandoval RS; Ye S; Cathcart AM; Starosta A; Avillach P Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):597.e1-597.e14. PubMed ID: 33309562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Opinion Formation on the Internet: The Influence of Personality, Network Structure, and Content on Sharing Messages Online. Burbach L; Halbach P; Ziefle M; Calero Valdez A Front Artif Intell; 2020; 3():45. PubMed ID: 33733162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Elevated Inter-Brain Coherence Between Subjects With Concordant Stances During Discussion of Social Issues. Richard C; Karić MS; McConnell M; Poole J; Rupp G; Fink A; Meghdadi A; Berka C Front Hum Neurosci; 2021; 15():611886. PubMed ID: 34054446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ideological biases in social sharing of online information about climate change. Cann TJB; Weaver IS; Williams HTP PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250656. PubMed ID: 33891669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]