These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36606676)

  • 1. Echocardiography- versus intracardiac electrocardiogram-based optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review.
    Sami A; Mustafa B; Butt HA; Ashraf Z; Ullah A; Babar F; Asad M; Awais M; Zaidi SMJ; Fakhar T; Mehmoodi A; Adnan N; Malik J
    Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2023 Mar; 28(2):e13040. PubMed ID: 36606676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Echocardiography versus intracardiac electrocardiography-based optimization for cardiac resynchronization therapy : a comparative clinical long-term trial.
    Jensen CJ; Liadski A; Bell M; Naber CK; Bruder O; Sabin GV; Küpper B; Wieneke H
    Herz; 2011 Oct; 36(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 21922233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of quick optimization of interventricular delay between simple methods: intracardiac electrogram and surface electrocardiogram after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Cheng CM; Huang JL; Wu TJ; Su CS; Pai HY; Liao MF; Ting CT; Chen SA
    Europace; 2012 Sep; 14(9):1317-23. PubMed ID: 22490372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Manual Intracardiac Electrogram Method Is Accurate Alternative to Echocardiography for Atrioventricular and Interventricular Optimization in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
    Pezo Nikolić B; Lovrić D; Ljubas Maček J; Rešković Lukšić V; Matasić R; Šeparović Hanževački J
    Acta Clin Croat; 2017 Dec; 56(4):618-624. PubMed ID: 29590714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrically guided versus imaging-guided implant of the left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a study protocol for a double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial (ElectroCRT).
    Stephansen C; Sommer A; Kronborg MB; Jensen JM; Bouchelouche K; Nielsen JC
    Trials; 2018 Nov; 19(1):600. PubMed ID: 30382923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-Term Effect of Different Optimizing Methods for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure: A Randomized and Controlled Pilot Study.
    Zhang Y; Xing Q; Zhang JH; Jiang WF; Qin M; Liu X
    Cardiology; 2019; 142(3):158-166. PubMed ID: 31189165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and narrow QRS complexes (≤ 130 ms): role of speckle tracking echocardiography and different interventricular (VV) pacing intervals.
    Kantharia BK; Singh A; Narasimhan B; Wu L; Karnik R; Chutani S; Shah AN
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2022 Mar; 63(2):369-377. PubMed ID: 34138397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrocardiographic optimization techniques in resynchronization therapy.
    Pujol-López M; San Antonio R; Mont L; Trucco E; Tolosana JM; Arbelo E; Guasch E; Heist EK; Singh JP
    Europace; 2019 Sep; 21(9):1286-1296. PubMed ID: 31038177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrically vs. imaging-guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Stephansen C; Sommer A; Kronborg MB; Jensen JM; Nørgaard BL; Gerdes C; Kristensen J; Jensen HK; Fyenbo DB; Bouchelouche K; Nielsen JC
    Europace; 2019 Sep; 21(9):1369-1377. PubMed ID: 31274152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with right ventricular sense triggered left ventricular pacing benefits for the hemodynamics compared with standard CRT for chronic congestive heart failure: A cross-over study.
    Pu LJ; Wang Y; Zhao L; Luo ZL; Hua BT; Han MH; Li SM; Yang J; Li L; Peng YZ; Guo T
    Cardiol J; 2015; 22(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 25179313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Pacemaker optimization guided by echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy].
    Trifunović D; Petrović M; Milasinović G; Vujisić-Tesić B; Boricić M; Nedeljković I; Jelić V; Zivković M; Jovanović V; Petrović O
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2009; 137(7-8):416-22. PubMed ID: 19764597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognostic importance of postoperative QRS widening in patients with heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Menet A; Bardet-Bouchery H; Guyomar Y; Graux P; Delelis F; Castel AL; Heuls S; Cuvelier E; Gevaert C; Ennezat PV; Tribouilloy C; Maréchaux S
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Aug; 13(8):1636-43. PubMed ID: 27236025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using three-dimensional echocardiography to guide left ventricle lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy: does it make any difference.
    Badran HA; Kamel JZ; Mohamed TR; Abdelhamid MA
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Apr; 48(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 28194611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of QRS complex duration and morphology on left ventricular reverse remodelling and left ventricular function improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    van der Bijl P; Khidir M; Leung M; Mertens B; Ajmone Marsan N; Delgado V; Bax JJ
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2017 Sep; 19(9):1145-1151. PubMed ID: 28176418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Remarkable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing in patients with true left bundle branch block.
    Guo J; Li L; Xiao G; Ye T; Huang X; Meng F; Li Q; Chen S; Cai B
    Clin Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 43(12):1460-1468. PubMed ID: 32960993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictors for restoration of normal left ventricular function in response to cardiac resynchronization therapy measured at time of implantation.
    Serdoz LV; Daleffe E; Merlo M; Zecchin M; Barbati G; Pecora D; Pinamonti B; Fantoni C; Lupo P; Di Lenarda A; Sinagra G; Cappato R
    Am J Cardiol; 2011 Jul; 108(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 21529746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On-treatment comparison between corrective His bundle pacing and biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization: A secondary analysis of the His-SYNC Pilot Trial.
    Upadhyay GA; Vijayaraman P; Nayak HM; Verma N; Dandamudi G; Sharma PS; Saleem M; Mandrola J; Genovese D; Oren JW; Subzposh FA; Aziz Z; Beaser A; Shatz D; Besser S; Lang RM; Trohman RG; Knight BP; Tung R;
    Heart Rhythm; 2019 Dec; 16(12):1797-1807. PubMed ID: 31096064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized pilot study of optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy in sinus rhythm patients using a peak endocardial acceleration sensor vs. standard methods.
    Ritter P; Delnoy PP; Padeletti L; Lunati M; Naegele H; Borri-Brunetto A; Silvestre J
    Europace; 2012 Sep; 14(9):1324-33. PubMed ID: 22549295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with and without pressure-volume loop optimization: comparison of the long-term efficacy of two different programming strategies.
    Ciconte G; Ćalović Ž; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Mangual J; Caporaso I; Baldi M; Saviano M; Cuko A; Vitale R; Conti M; Giannelli L; Vicedomini G; Santinelli V; Pappone C
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2019 Mar; 54(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30483980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Risum N
    Dan Med J; 2014 Dec; 61(12):B4981. PubMed ID: 25441737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.