These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study. Pritchard NL; Hiscock RJ; Lockie E; Permezel M; McGauren MFG; Kennedy AL; Green B; Walker SP; Lindquist AC PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002923. PubMed ID: 31584941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of regional versus global growth charts for the classification of small-for-gestational age neonates. Anand P; Thomas D; Agarwal R; Thukral A; Deorari AK; Paul VK; Sankar MJ Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2023 Jan; 108(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 35551076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study. Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J BJOG; 2022 May; 129(6):938-948. PubMed ID: 34797926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing INTERGROWTH-21st Century and Hadlock growth standards to predict small for gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes. Nwabuobi C; Odibo L; Camisasca-Lopina H; Leavitt K; Tuuli M; Odibo AO J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jun; 33(11):1906-1912. PubMed ID: 30614334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. INTERGROWTH-21st compared with GROW customized centiles in the detection of adverse perinatal outcomes at term. Pritchard N; Lindquist A; Siqueira IDA; Walker SP; Permezel M J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Mar; 33(6):961-966. PubMed ID: 30372647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Adverse neonatal outcome in twin pregnancy complicated by small-for-gestational age: twin vs singleton reference charts. Briffa C; Di Fabrizio C; Kalafat E; Giorgione V; Bhate R; Huddy C; Richards J; Shetty S; Khalil A Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 59(3):377-384. PubMed ID: 34405924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Fenton, INTERGROWTH-21 Anne RP; Vardhelli V; Murki S; Deshabhotla SK; Oleti TP Indian J Pediatr; 2022 Oct; 89(10):1034-1036. PubMed ID: 35604586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of individual antenatal tools for prediction of small-for-gestational age at birth. Poljak B; Agarwal U; Jackson R; Alfirevic Z; Sharp A Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 27486031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB/NICHD Detroit study. Tarca AL; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Erez O; Hernandez-Andrade E; Yeo L; Bhatti G; Pacora P; Maymon E; Hassan SS Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S679-S691.e4. PubMed ID: 29422207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Vayssière C; Sentilhes L; Ego A; Bernard C; Cambourieu D; Flamant C; Gascoin G; Gaudineau A; Grangé G; Houfflin-Debarge V; Langer B; Malan V; Marcorelles P; Nizard J; Perrotin F; Salomon L; Senat MV; Serry A; Tessier V; Truffert P; Tsatsaris V; Arnaud C; Carbonne B Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():10-8. PubMed ID: 26207980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity. Anderson NH; Sadler LC; McKinlay CJD; McCowan LME Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):509.e1-509.e7. PubMed ID: 26546850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Poor effectiveness of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and consequences for obstetric management and neonatal outcomes: a French national study. Monier I; Blondel B; Ego A; Kaminiski M; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):518-27. PubMed ID: 25346493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Which growth standards should be used to identify large- and small-for-gestational age infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes? A pre-specified analysis of the CONCEPTT trial. Meek CL; Corcoy R; Asztalos E; Kusinski LC; López E; Feig DS; Murphy HR; BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jan; 21(1):96. PubMed ID: 33514342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]