These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36606760)

  • 1. Performance of the INTERGROWTH-21
    Miranda J; Maestre N; Paternina-Caicedo Á; Parra-Saavedra M; Caradeux J; Sepulveda-Martinez Á; Pelaez-Chomba M; Torres A; Parra-Cordero M; Diaz-Corvillón P; Gallo DM; Santacruz D; Rodriguez N; Sarmiento A; Benavides JA; Girado S; Rojas-Suarez JA; Gratacós E; Figueras F
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 161(3):1083-1091. PubMed ID: 36606760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.
    Kabiri D; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Hernandez-Andrade E; Pacora P; Benshalom-Tirosh N; Tirosh D; Yeo L; Erez O; Hassan SS; Tarca AL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 31006913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study.
    Choi SKY; Gordon A; Hilder L; Henry A; Hyett JA; Brew BK; Joseph F; Jorm L; Chambers GM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 58(2):264-277. PubMed ID: 32672406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performances of birthweight charts to predict adverse perinatal outcomes related to SGA in a cohort of nulliparas.
    Galvão RB; Souza RT; Vieira MC; Pasupathy D; Mayrink J; Feitosa FE; Rocha Filho EA; Leite DF; Vettorazzi J; Calderon IM; Sousa MH; Cecatti JG;
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Aug; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 35927626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21
    Francis A; Hugh O; Gardosi J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S692-S699. PubMed ID: 29422208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Customized birth-weight centiles and placenta-related fetal growth restriction.
    Melamed N; Hiersch L; Aviram A; Keating S; Kingdom JC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 33073889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study.
    Pritchard NL; Hiscock RJ; Lockie E; Permezel M; McGauren MFG; Kennedy AL; Green B; Walker SP; Lindquist AC
    PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002923. PubMed ID: 31584941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of regional versus global growth charts for the classification of small-for-gestational age neonates.
    Anand P; Thomas D; Agarwal R; Thukral A; Deorari AK; Paul VK; Sankar MJ
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2023 Jan; 108(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 35551076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Customized GROW vs INTERGROWTH-21
    Fay E; Hugh O; Francis A; Katz R; Sitcov K; Souter V; Gardosi J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Mar; 4(2):100545. PubMed ID: 34875415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study.
    Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    BJOG; 2022 May; 129(6):938-948. PubMed ID: 34797926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing INTERGROWTH-21st Century and Hadlock growth standards to predict small for gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes.
    Nwabuobi C; Odibo L; Camisasca-Lopina H; Leavitt K; Tuuli M; Odibo AO
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jun; 33(11):1906-1912. PubMed ID: 30614334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. INTERGROWTH-21st compared with GROW customized centiles in the detection of adverse perinatal outcomes at term.
    Pritchard N; Lindquist A; Siqueira IDA; Walker SP; Permezel M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Mar; 33(6):961-966. PubMed ID: 30372647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adverse neonatal outcome in twin pregnancy complicated by small-for-gestational age: twin vs singleton reference charts.
    Briffa C; Di Fabrizio C; Kalafat E; Giorgione V; Bhate R; Huddy C; Richards J; Shetty S; Khalil A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 59(3):377-384. PubMed ID: 34405924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Fenton, INTERGROWTH-21
    Anne RP; Vardhelli V; Murki S; Deshabhotla SK; Oleti TP
    Indian J Pediatr; 2022 Oct; 89(10):1034-1036. PubMed ID: 35604586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of individual antenatal tools for prediction of small-for-gestational age at birth.
    Poljak B; Agarwal U; Jackson R; Alfirevic Z; Sharp A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 27486031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB/NICHD Detroit study.
    Tarca AL; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Erez O; Hernandez-Andrade E; Yeo L; Bhatti G; Pacora P; Maymon E; Hassan SS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S679-S691.e4. PubMed ID: 29422207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Sentilhes L; Ego A; Bernard C; Cambourieu D; Flamant C; Gascoin G; Gaudineau A; Grangé G; Houfflin-Debarge V; Langer B; Malan V; Marcorelles P; Nizard J; Perrotin F; Salomon L; Senat MV; Serry A; Tessier V; Truffert P; Tsatsaris V; Arnaud C; Carbonne B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():10-8. PubMed ID: 26207980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity.
    Anderson NH; Sadler LC; McKinlay CJD; McCowan LME
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):509.e1-509.e7. PubMed ID: 26546850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Poor effectiveness of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and consequences for obstetric management and neonatal outcomes: a French national study.
    Monier I; Blondel B; Ego A; Kaminiski M; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):518-27. PubMed ID: 25346493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Which growth standards should be used to identify large- and small-for-gestational age infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes? A pre-specified analysis of the CONCEPTT trial.
    Meek CL; Corcoy R; Asztalos E; Kusinski LC; López E; Feig DS; Murphy HR;
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jan; 21(1):96. PubMed ID: 33514342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.