BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36606874)

  • 1. Isotonic design for phase I cancer clinical trials with late-onset toxicities.
    Wages NA; Braun TM; Conaway MR
    J Biopharm Stat; 2023 May; 33(3):357-370. PubMed ID: 36606874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A hybrid design for dose-finding oncology clinical trials.
    Liao JJZ; Zhou F; Zhou H; Petruzzelli L; Hou K; Asatiani E
    Int J Cancer; 2022 Nov; 151(9):1602-1610. PubMed ID: 35802470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of the patient-reported outcomes continual reassessment method to a phase I study of radiotherapy in endometrial cancer.
    Wages NA; Nelson B; Kharofa J; Meier T
    Int J Biostat; 2023 May; 19(1):163-176. PubMed ID: 36394530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Case Example of Dose Optimization Using Data From Bortezomib Dose-Finding Clinical Trials.
    Lee SM; Backenroth D; Cheung YK; Hershman DL; Vulih D; Anderson B; Ivy P; Minasian L
    J Clin Oncol; 2016 Apr; 34(12):1395-401. PubMed ID: 26926682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose escalation with overdose control using a quasi-continuous toxicity score in cancer Phase I clinical trials.
    Chen Z; Tighiouart M; Kowalski J
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Sep; 33(5):949-58. PubMed ID: 22561391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Escalation with overdose control using all toxicities and time to event toxicity data in cancer Phase I clinical trials.
    Chen Z; Cui Y; Owonikoko TK; Wang Z; Li Z; Luo R; Kutner M; Khuri FR; Kowalski J
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2014 Mar; 37(2):322-32. PubMed ID: 24530487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Designing dose-escalation trials with late-onset toxicities using the time-to-event continual reassessment method.
    Normolle D; Lawrence T
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Sep; 24(27):4426-33. PubMed ID: 16983110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive dose-finding based on safety and feasibility in early-phase clinical trials of adoptive cell immunotherapy.
    Wages NA; Fadul CE
    Clin Trials; 2020 Apr; 17(2):157-165. PubMed ID: 31856602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive design for identifying maximum tolerated dose early to accelerate dose-finding trial.
    Kojima M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):97. PubMed ID: 35382745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An extended Bayesian semi-mechanistic dose-finding design for phase I oncology trials using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information.
    Yang C; Li Y
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(4):689-705. PubMed ID: 38110304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.
    Du Y; Yin J; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):271-286. PubMed ID: 30403559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose finding with continuous outcome in phase I oncology trials.
    Wang Y; Ivanova A
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 25408518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Small-sample behavior of novel phase I cancer trial designs.
    Oron AP; Hoff PD
    Clin Trials; 2013 Feb; 10(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 23345304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Towards using a full spectrum of early clinical trial data: a retrospective analysis to compare potential longitudinal categorical models for molecular targeted therapies in oncology.
    Colin P; Micallef S; Delattre M; Mancini P; Parent E
    Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(22):2999-3016. PubMed ID: 26059319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repeated measures dose-finding design with time-trend detection in the presence of correlated toxicity data.
    Yin J; Paoletti X; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
    Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 14(6):611-620. PubMed ID: 28764555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A 2-in-1 adaptive design to seamlessly expand a selected dose from a phase 2 trial to a phase 3 trial for oncology drug development.
    Zhang P; Li XN; Lu K; Wu C
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2022 Nov; 122():106931. PubMed ID: 36174958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian adaptive design for cancer phase I trials using a flexible range of doses.
    Tighiouart M; Cook-Wiens G; Rogatko A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(3):562-574. PubMed ID: 28858566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Bayesian adaptive design for estimating the maximum tolerated dose curve using drug combinations in cancer phase I clinical trials.
    Tighiouart M; Li Q; Rogatko A
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):280-290. PubMed ID: 27060889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian dose-finding phase I trial design incorporating historical data from a preceding trial.
    Takeda K; Morita S
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Jul; 17(4):372-382. PubMed ID: 29372582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose-finding based on feasibility and late-onset toxicity in adoptive cell therapy trials.
    Bagley EM; Wages NA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Mar; 34(2):151-163. PubMed ID: 36879525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.