These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36607153)

  • 1. Results of sacrospinous ligament fixation using conventional instruments for symptomatic stage 2 and 3 apical prolapse over 3 years.
    Ren C; Zhang YL; Tian WJ; Wang Y; Guo JB; Shi HH; Sun ZJ; Chen J; Zhu L
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 161(3):812-819. PubMed ID: 36607153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Prospective cohort study on the outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation using conventional instruments in treating stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
    Ren C; Song XC; Zhu L; Ai FF; Shi HH; Sun ZJ; Chen J; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):369-373. PubMed ID: 28647958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S;
    JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety and efficacy of ischial spine fascia and sacrospinous ligament fixation for symptomatic stage 2 and 3 apical prolapse.
    Ren C; Zhu L
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2020 Jun; 149(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 32196660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes of the anterior approach versus posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Bastani P; Tayebi S; Ghabousian A; Salehi-Pourmehr H; Hajebrahimi S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1857-1862. PubMed ID: 35347369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fast track sacrospinous ligament fixation: subjective and objective outcomes at 6 months.
    Greisen S; Axelsen SM; Bek KM; Guldberg R; Glavind-Kristensen M
    BMC Womens Health; 2021 Apr; 21(1):154. PubMed ID: 33863314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Examination Ba and D Guide the Selection of Operation for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse?
    Li C; Shu H; Dai Z
    J Invest Surg; 2020 Jun; 33(5):438-445. PubMed ID: 30574821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of transvaginal modified sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-before and after studies.
    Zhu Q; Shu H; Du G; Dai Z
    Int J Surg; 2018 Apr; 52():40-43. PubMed ID: 29455045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combined anterior vaginal wall mesh with sacrospinous ligament fixation or with posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse.
    Heinonen PK; Nieminen K
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Aug; 157(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 21561703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of uterine preservation on long-term subjective outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Ng SC; Tsui KP; Huang L; Chen GD
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():167-171. PubMed ID: 31299523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bilateral minimal tension sacrospinous fixation in pelvic organ prolapse: an observational study.
    Mothes AR; Wanzke L; Radosa MP; Runnebaum IB
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():1-5. PubMed ID: 25766786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term reoperation risk after apical prolapse repair in female pelvic reconstructive surgery.
    Shah NM; Berger AA; Zhuang Z; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):306.e1-306.e16. PubMed ID: 35654112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Schulten SF; Detollenaere RJ; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; Van Eijndhoven HW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy with Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the Treatment of Vaginal Apical Prolapse; the First Randomized Clinical Trial: A pilot study.
    Daneshpajooh A; Pakmanesh H; Sohbati S; Mirzaei M; Zemanati E; Dehesh T
    Urol J; 2022 Jan; 19(2):131-137. PubMed ID: 35094377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcome of Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation of the Vault during Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Dangal G; Poudel R; Shrestha R; Karki A; Pradhan HK; Bhattachan K; Bajracharya N
    J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2018 Oct; 16(3):321-324. PubMed ID: 30455493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Under Local Anesthesia in Elderly Patients at High Risk of General Anesthesia.
    Senturk MB; Doğan O
    J Invest Surg; 2020 Jan; 33(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 29733751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abdominal sacral colpopexy versus sacrospinous ligament fixation: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Ohno MS; Richardson ML; Sokol ER
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Feb; 27(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 26282093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
    Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anatomical and functional outcomes after hysterectomy and bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation for stage IV uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective case series.
    Kavvadias T; Schoenfisch B; Brucker SY; Reisenauer C
    BMC Urol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):126. PubMed ID: 32814553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.