These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36607743)

  • 1. Prospective Comparison Between Manual and Computer-Assisted (FOX) Cochlear Implant Fitting in Newly Implanted Patients.
    Wathour J; Govaerts PJ; Derue L; Vanderbemden S; Huaux H; Lacroix E; Deggouj N
    Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):494-505. PubMed ID: 36607743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From manual to artificial intelligence fitting: Two cochlear implant case studies.
    Wathour J; Govaerts PJ; Deggouj N
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Sep; 21(5):299-305. PubMed ID: 31530099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigation of an Outcomes-Driven, Computer-Assisted Approach to CI Fitting in Newly Implanted Patients.
    Zwolan TA; Presley R; Chenier L; Buck B
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):558-564. PubMed ID: 33027199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of a CI Programming Fitting Tool with Artificial Intelligence in Experienced Cochlear Implant Patients.
    Wathour J; Govaerts PJ; Lacroix E; Naïma D
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Mar; 44(3):209-215. PubMed ID: 36728126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do the minimum and maximum comfortable stimulation levels influence the cortical potential latencies or the speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users?
    Martins KVC; Goffi-Gomez MVS; Tsuji RK; Bento RF
    Hear Res; 2021 May; 404():108206. PubMed ID: 33677193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-assisted CI fitting: Is the learning capacity of the intelligent agent FOX beneficial for speech understanding?
    Meeuws M; Pascoal D; Bermejo I; Artaso M; De Ceulaer G; Govaerts PJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Jul; 18(4):198-206. PubMed ID: 28498083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the 'Fitting to Outcomes eXpert' (FOX®) with established cochlear implant users.
    Buechner A; Vaerenberg B; Gazibegovic D; Brendel M; De Ceulaer G; Govaerts P; Lenarz T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jan; 16(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 24950595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic Current Focusing Compared to Monopolar Stimulation in a Take-Home Trial of Cochlear Implant Users.
    van Groesen NRA; Briaire JJ; de Jong MAM; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):306-317. PubMed ID: 36279119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of 'Fitting to Outcomes Expert' FOX™ with new cochlear implant users in a multi-centre study.
    Battmer RD; Borel S; Brendel M; Buchner A; Cooper H; Fielden C; Gazibegovic D; Goetze R; Govaerts P; Kelleher K; Lenartz T; Mosnier I; Muff J; Nunn T; Vaerenberg B; Vanat Z
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Mar; 16(2):100-9. PubMed ID: 25118042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A longitudinal study of speech perception skills and device characteristics of adolescent cochlear implant users.
    Robinson EJ; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM; Brenner CM; Geers AE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):341-9. PubMed ID: 22533977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimization of programming parameters in children with the advanced bionics cochlear implant.
    Baudhuin J; Cadieux J; Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Maxson JL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):302-12. PubMed ID: 22533974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Tonotopic and Default Frequency Fitting for Speech Understanding in Noise in New Cochlear Implantees: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Study.
    Creff G; Lambert C; Coudert P; Pean V; Laurent S; Godey B
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jan-Feb 01; 45(1):35-52. PubMed ID: 37823850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy.
    Holden LK; Skinner MW; Holden TA; Demorest ME
    Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):463-76. PubMed ID: 12411779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance benefits for adults using a cochlear implant with adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a comparative study.
    Müller-Deile J; Kiefer J; Wyss J; Nicolai J; Battmer R
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2008 Mar; 9(1):8-26. PubMed ID: 18300224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants.
    Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical Outcomes of the Cochlear™ Nucleus(®) 5 Cochlear Implant System and SmartSound™ 2 Signal Processing.
    Runge CL; Henion K; Tarima S; Beiter A; Zwolan TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):425-440. PubMed ID: 27310402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.