These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36610423)

  • 1. Risk Analysis for Quality Control Part 1: The Impact of Transition Assumptions in the Parvin Model.
    Schmidt RL; Moore RA; Walker BS; Rudolf JW
    J Appl Lab Med; 2023 Jan; 8(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 36610423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk Analysis for Quality Control Part 2: Theoretical Foundations for Risk Analysis.
    Moore RA; Rudolf JW; Schmidt RL
    J Appl Lab Med; 2023 Jan; 8(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 36610426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Precision quality control: a dynamic model for risk-based analysis of analytical quality.
    Schmidt RL; Moore RA; Walker BS; Rudolf JW
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2023 Mar; 61(4):679-687. PubMed ID: 36617955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-based quality control for glucometers: using the moving sum of positive patient results and moving average.
    Lim CY; Badrick T; Loh TP
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2020 Jun; 30(2):020709. PubMed ID: 32550817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: I. A prospective intended use study.
    Patten SF; Lee JS; Wilbur DC; Bonfiglio TA; Colgan TJ; Richart RM; Cramer H; Moinuddin S
    Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):337-42. PubMed ID: 9438458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The costs and benefits of cross-level quality control rules.
    Schmidt RL; Moore RA; Pearson LN
    Clin Chim Acta; 2020 Nov; 510():697-702. PubMed ID: 32910975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selecting multi-rule quality control procedures based on patient risk.
    Bayat H
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Oct; 55(11):1702-1708. PubMed ID: 28236626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality control optimization part I: Metrics for evaluating predictive performance of quality control.
    Schmidt RL; Pearson LN
    Clin Chim Acta; 2019 Aug; 495():174-184. PubMed ID: 30974098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison and optimization of various moving patient-based real-time quality control procedures for serum sodium.
    Li Y; Yu Q; Zhang X; Chen X
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2021 Oct; 35(10):e23985. PubMed ID: 34520584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of assay stability on the false negative and false positive rates in quality control.
    Schmidt RL; Walker BS; Moore RA; Rudolf JW
    Clin Chim Acta; 2023 Feb; 540():117208. PubMed ID: 36566959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Moving sum of number of positive patient result as a quality control tool.
    Liu J; Tan CH; Badrick T; Loh TP
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Oct; 55(11):1709-1714. PubMed ID: 28328525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality control optimization part II: A method to optimize the accuracy of laboratory quality control.
    Schmidt RL; Pearson LN
    Clin Chim Acta; 2019 Aug; 495():233-238. PubMed ID: 31004575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term experience of MPC across multiple TrueBeam linacs: MPC concordance with conventional QC and sensitivity to real-world faults.
    Pearson M; Eaton D; Greener T
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 21(8):224-235. PubMed ID: 32790139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An introduction to statistical process control in research proteomics.
    Bramwell D
    J Proteomics; 2013 Dec; 95():3-21. PubMed ID: 23791708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repeat patient testing-based quality control shows promise for use in veterinary biochemistry testing.
    Flatland B; Freeman KP
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2020 Dec; 49(4):590-606. PubMed ID: 33314202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Total Quality-Control Plan with Right-Sized Statistical Quality-Control.
    Westgard JO
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):137-150. PubMed ID: 28153361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Counterpoint to the Letter to the Editor by Badrick and Parvin in regard to Comparison of four methods of establishing control limits for monitoring quality controls in infectious disease serology testing.
    Dimech W; Vincini G; Karakaltas M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 Apr; 57(5):e73-e74. PubMed ID: 30710479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multileaf collimator performance monitoring and improvement using semiautomated quality control testing and statistical process control.
    Létourneau D; Wang A; Amin MN; Pearce J; McNiven A; Keller H; Norrlinger B; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121713. PubMed ID: 25471960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Guidance for quality control practices and precision goals for CBCs based on IQMH patterns-of-practice survey.
    Johnston A; Bourner G; Martin T; McFarlane A; Good D; Padmore R; Raby A; Aslan B
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Feb; 41(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 30138534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.