132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36610689)
1. National Utilization, Reimbursement, and Urban Versus Rural Trends of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy and Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy.
Kaplan-Marans E; Jivanji D; Vazquez-Rivera K; Martinez M; Lee J; Shpeen BH; Sandozi A; Schulman A
Urology; 2023 Apr; 174():48-51. PubMed ID: 36610689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.
Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET
Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteric calculi: efficacy and patient satisfaction.
Ghalayini IF; Al-Ghazo MA; Khader YS
Int Braz J Urol; 2006; 32(6):656-64; discussion 664-7. PubMed ID: 17201943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ureteroscopy and Shock Wave Lithotripsy Trends from 2012 to 2019 Within the US Medicare Dataset: Sharp Growth in Ureteroscopy Utilization.
Haas CR; Li S; Knoedler MA; Penniston KL; Nakada SY
J Endourol; 2023 Feb; 37(2):219-224. PubMed ID: 36205599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost analysis of ureteroscopy (URS) vs extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the management of ureteric stones <10 mm in adults: a UK perspective.
Constanti M; Calvert RC; Thomas K; Dickinson A; Carlisle S
BJU Int; 2020 Mar; 125(3):457-466. PubMed ID: 31663246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Distal ureteral lithiasis. ESWL versus ambulatory URS].
Miján Ortiz JL; Gutiérrez Tejero F; López Carmona F; Nogueras Ocaña M; Arrabal Martín M; Zuluaga Gómez A
Arch Esp Urol; 2001 Nov; 54(9):983-7. PubMed ID: 11789375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies.
Arcaniolo D; De Sio M; Rassweiler J; Nicholas J; Lima E; Carrieri G; Liatsikos E; Mirone V; Monga M; Autorino R
Urolithiasis; 2017 Dec; 45(6):563-572. PubMed ID: 28233025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Outcomes of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy with Ureteroscopic Lasertripsy for Management of Proximal Ureteral Stones.
Mustafa G; Mahar NA; Qureshi HH; Mustafa M; Fayaz M; Hassan AS
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2024 Jan; 34(1):101-104. PubMed ID: 38185970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ureteroscopy and pneumatic lithotripsy, followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of distal ureteral stones.
Gurbuz ZG; Gonen M; Fazlioglu A; Akbulut H
Int J Urol; 2002 Aug; 9(8):441-4. PubMed ID: 12225341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study.
Strohmaier WL; Schubert G; Rosenkranz T; Weigl A
Eur Urol; 1999 Nov; 36(5):376-9. PubMed ID: 10516445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment of mid- and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy vs laser ureteroscopy. A comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness.
Bierkens AF; Hendrikx AJ; De La Rosette JJ; Stultiens GN; Beerlage HP; Arends AJ; Debruyne FM
Br J Urol; 1998 Jan; 81(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 9467473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and intracorporeal lithotripsy for proximal ureteric calculi--a comparative assessment of efficacy and safety.
Fong YK; Ho SH; Peh OH; Ng FC; Lim PH; Quek PL; Ng KK
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2004 Jan; 33(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 15008569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Lam JS; Greene TD; Gupta M
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1972-6. PubMed ID: 11956420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ESWL and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in management of ureteral stones.
Cui Y; Cao W; Shen H; Xie J; Adams TS; Zhang Y; Shao Q
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87634. PubMed ID: 24498344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy as primary treatment for ureteric stones: a retrospective study comparing two different treatment strategies.
Lindqvist K; Holmberg G; Peeker R; Grenabo L
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 16608808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?
Tiselius HG
Urol Res; 2005 Jun; 33(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 15924257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness comparison of ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
Cone EB; Pareek G; Ursiny M; Eisner B
World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):161-166. PubMed ID: 27145788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Ureterorenoscopy (URS) in treatment of ureteral calculi. II. Ureteroscopic treatment of calculus debris after ESWL].
Fernandez De la Maza S; Noldus J; Huland H
Urologe A; 1999 Mar; 38(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 10231933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative analysis of direct and indirect costs of two minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of renal/ureteral calculi smaller than 2 cm.
Perez-Ardavin J; Lorenzo L; Caballer-Tarazona V; Budía-Alba A; Vivas-Consuelo D; Bahilo-Mateu P; Ordaz-Jurado G; Trassierra-Villa M; López-Acón JD; Boronat-Tormo F
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2020 Sep; 44(7):505-511. PubMed ID: 32593640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treatment of proximal ureteric calculi: a cost-effectiveness study.
Izamin I; Aniza I; Rizal AM; Aljunid SM
Med J Malaysia; 2009 Mar; 64(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 19852314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
