These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36613215)

  • 21. Efficiency performance and safety evaluation of the responsibility-sensitive safety in freeway car-following scenarios using automated longitudinal controls.
    Hassanin O; Wang X; Wu X; Xu X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Nov; 177():106799. PubMed ID: 36081222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Characterizing car-following behaviors of human drivers when following automated vehicles using the real-world dataset.
    Wen X; Cui Z; Jian S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jul; 172():106689. PubMed ID: 35569279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Human-like car-following model for autonomous vehicles considering the cut-in behavior of other vehicles in mixed traffic.
    Fu R; Li Z; Sun Q; Wang C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105260. PubMed ID: 31442924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Drivers' Evaluation of Different Automated Driving Styles: Is It Both Comfortable and Natural?
    Peng C; Merat N; Romano R; Hajiseyedjavadi F; Paschalidis E; Wei C; Radhakrishnan V; Solernou A; Forster D; Boer E
    Hum Factors; 2024 Mar; 66(3):787-806. PubMed ID: 35818335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rage against the machine? Google's self-driving cars versus human drivers.
    Teoh ER; Kidd DG
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():57-60. PubMed ID: 29203024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Exploration of the intelligent control system of autonomous vehicles based on edge computing.
    Ming G
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0281294. PubMed ID: 36730359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A fundamental experimental approach for optimal design of speed bumps.
    Lav AH; Bilgin E; Lav AH
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():53-68. PubMed ID: 28583281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis on congestion mechanism of CAVs around traffic accident zones.
    Ma Q; Wang X; Niu S; Zeng H; Ullah S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Sep; 205():107663. PubMed ID: 38901162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Virtual testing of speed reduction schemes on urban collector roads.
    Domenichini L; Branzi V; Meocci M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():38-51. PubMed ID: 29101788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of daily car-following behaviors on urban roadway rear-end crashes and near-crashes: A naturalistic driving study.
    Wang X; Zhang X; Guo F; Gu Y; Zhu X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jan; 164():106502. PubMed ID: 34837850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantifying visual road environment to establish a speeding prediction model: An examination using naturalistic driving data.
    Yu B; Chen Y; Bao S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():289-298. PubMed ID: 31177040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Investigate moped-car conflicts in China using a naturalistic driving study approach.
    Glaser YG; Guo F; Fang Y; Deng B; Hankey J
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():171-175. PubMed ID: 29203016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How do drivers respond to driving risk during car-following? Risk-response driver model and its application in human-like longitudinal control.
    Zhao X; He R; Wang J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105783. PubMed ID: 33022511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Young drivers and their cars: Safe and sound or the perfect storm?
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Scott-Parker B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():18-28. PubMed ID: 29080470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Decision-Making Strategy for Car Following Based on Naturalist Driving Data via Deep Reinforcement Learning.
    Li W; Zhang Y; Shi X; Qiu F
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Human-Like Lane Change Decision Model for Autonomous Vehicles that Considers the Risk Perception of Drivers in Mixed Traffic.
    Wang C; Sun Q; Li Z; Zhang H
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32316210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How do drivers overtake pedestrians? Evidence from field test and naturalistic driving data.
    Rasch A; Panero G; Boda CN; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 May; 139():105494. PubMed ID: 32203729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intelligent Driving Assistant Based on Road Accident Risk Map Analysis and Vehicle Telemetry.
    Terán J; Navarro L; Quintero M CG; Pardo M
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 32235783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative Study of Cooperative Platoon Merging Control Based on Reinforcement Learning.
    Irshayyid A; Chen J
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 36679787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Communication via motion - Suitability of automated vehicle movements to negotiate the right of way in road bottleneck scenarios.
    Rettenmaier M; Dinkel S; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Sep; 95():103438. PubMed ID: 33895469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.