148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36615812)
81. Reliability and safety of minimally invasive esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a retrospective study.
Liu G; Han Y; Peng L; Wang K; Fan Y
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 May; 14(1):97. PubMed ID: 31138245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy is associated with pneumonia in minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Oshikiri T; Takiguchi G; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
Surg Endosc; 2021 Feb; 35(2):837-844. PubMed ID: 32086619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Early postoperative pulmonary complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position: incidence and perioperative risk factors from the perspective of anesthetic management.
Ishikawa S; Ozato S; Ebina T; Yoshioka S; Miichi M; Watanabe M; Yokota M
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Jul; 70(7):659-667. PubMed ID: 35435632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Impact of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation and Long-Term Mortality in Patients Among Esophageal Cancer.
Chen L; Li B; Jiang C; Fu G
Cancer Control; 2020; 27(1):1073274820974013. PubMed ID: 33179519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. A successful clinical pathway protocol for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Merritt RE; Kneuertz PJ; D'Souza DM; Perry KA
Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1696-1703. PubMed ID: 31286257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Intraoperative Lipid-Rich Nutrition in the Detection of Chylothorax in Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
Lubbers M; van Det MJ; Kouwenhoven EA
Surg Innov; 2019 Oct; 26(5):545-550. PubMed ID: 31161875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
87. Omission of intraoperative pyloric procedures in minimally invasive esophagectomy: assessing the impact on patients.
Bolger JC; Lau H; Yeung JC; Darling GE
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36073933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Incidence and impact of postoperative atrial fibrillation after minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Day RW; Jaroszewski D; Chang YH; Ross HJ; Paripati H; Ashman JB; Rule WG; Harold KL
Dis Esophagus; 2016 Aug; 29(6):583-8. PubMed ID: 25824527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Risk of chyle leak after robotic versus video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy.
Dezube AR; Kucukak S; De León LE; Kostopanagiotou K; Jaklitsch MT; Wee JO
Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1332-1338. PubMed ID: 33660122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Reporting National Outcomes After Esophagectomy and Gastrectomy According to the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group (ECCG).
van der Werf LR; Busweiler LAD; van Sandick JW; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Wijnhoven BPL;
Ann Surg; 2020 Jun; 271(6):1095-1101. PubMed ID: 30676381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Using Benchmarking Standards to Evaluate Transition to Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
Carroll PA; Jacob N; Yeung JC; Darling GE
Ann Thorac Surg; 2020 Feb; 109(2):383-388. PubMed ID: 31541632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Esophageal Position Affects Short-Term Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.
Uchihara T; Yoshida N; Baba Y; Nakashima Y; Kimura Y; Saeki H; Takeno S; Sadanaga N; Ikebe M; Morita M; Toh Y; Nanashima A; Maehara Y; Baba H
World J Surg; 2020 Mar; 44(3):831-837. PubMed ID: 31701157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Reassessment of the role of enteral tube feedings for patients with esophageal cancer.
Starr B; Davis S; Ayala-Peacock D; Blackstock WA; Levine EA
Am Surg; 2014 Aug; 80(8):752-8. PubMed ID: 25105392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive surgical interventions for esophageal and gastric cancer in the acute setting: a nationwide cohort study.
Borggreve AS; Kingma BF; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R;
Surg Endosc; 2021 Mar; 35(3):1219-1229. PubMed ID: 32215746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Comparison of Up-Front Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy on Quality of Life for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer.
Li Z; Cheng J; Zhang Y; Wen S; Lv H; Xu Y; Zhu Y; Zhang Z; Mu D; Tian Z
Curr Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):693-701. PubMed ID: 33503901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. A long-term follow-up study of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with linear stapled anastomosis.
Okabe H; Tsunoda S; Sunagawa H; Saji M; Hirai K; Nakau M; Tanaka E; Obama K
Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):1979-1988. PubMed ID: 33837477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Benefit of a laparoscopic jejunostomy feeding catheter insertion to prevent bowel obstruction associated with feeding jejunostomy after esophagectomy.
Kitagawa H; Yokota K; Utsunomiya M; Tanaka T; Namikawa T; Kobayashi M; Seo S
Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4298. PubMed ID: 38383707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. The effect of postoperative complications on survival of patients after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Li KK; Wang YJ; Liu XH; Tan QY; Jiang YG; Guo W
Surg Endosc; 2017 Sep; 31(9):3475-3482. PubMed ID: 27924395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Feeding via duodenostomy can reduce intestinal obstruction after radical resection of esophageal cancer better than jejunostomy.
Chen Y; Wang F
J Gastrointest Oncol; 2023 Oct; 14(5):1993-2005. PubMed ID: 37969838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Sarcopenia remaining after intensive nutritional feeding support could be a criterion for the selection of patients for surgery for oesogastric junction adenocarcinoma.
de Mathelin P; Manfredelli S; Delhorme JB; Venkatasamy A; Rohr S; Brigand C; Gaiddon C; Romain B
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Feb; 49(2):384-391. PubMed ID: 36372618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
