These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36617623)
21. Can general surgeons perform laparoscopic surgery independently within 10 years of training? A nationwide survey on laparoscopic surgery training in Japan. Kurashima Y; Hirano S; Yamaguchi S Surg Today; 2021 Aug; 51(8):1328-1334. PubMed ID: 33403478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Physician pain and discomfort during minimally invasive gynecologic cancer surgery. McDonald ME; Ramirez PT; Munsell MF; Greer M; Burke WM; Naumann WT; Frumovitz M Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Aug; 134(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 24887354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Skill qualifications in pediatric minimally invasive surgery. Iwanaka T; Morikawa Y; Yamataka A; Nio M; Segawa O; Kawashima H; Sato M; Terakura H; Take H; Hirose R; Yagi M Pediatr Surg Int; 2011 Jul; 27(7):727-31. PubMed ID: 21365230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The current status of gynecological laparoscopic surgery in educational facilities in Japan. Murakami T; Konno R; Terada Y; Sugawara J; Yaegashi N; Okamura K Tohoku J Exp Med; 2001 Mar; 193(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 11315764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Survey of minimally invasive general surgery fellows training in robotic surgery. Shaligram A; Meyer A; Simorov A; Pallati P; Oleynikov D J Robot Surg; 2013 Jun; 7(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 27000903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding the Utility of Robotically Assisted Gynecologic Surgery Among Practicing Gynecologists. Wright JD; Raglan GB; Schulkin J; Fialkow MF J Healthc Qual; 2017; 39(4):211-218. PubMed ID: 26566237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of a laparoscopic training program with or without robotic assistance. Letouzey V; Huberlant S; Faillie JL; Prudhomme M; Mares P; de Tayrac R Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Oct; 181():321-7. PubMed ID: 25216348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotic surgery for gynecologic cancers: indications, techniques and controversies. Clair KH; Tewari KS J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Jun; 46(6):828-843. PubMed ID: 32410262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer, especially in cervical cancer]. Bánhidi A; Novák Z Magy Onkol; 2022 Dec; 66(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 36602249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Overview and perspectives about the robotic surgical certification process in Brazil: the new statement and a national web-survey. Araujo RLC; Benevenuto DS; Zilberstein B; Sallum RA; Aguiar-Jr S; Cavazzola LT; Nacul M; Melani AGF; Tomasich FDS Rev Col Bras Cir; 2020; 47():e20202714. PubMed ID: 33111834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair. Ross JW; Preston MR Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 19415062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Challenges of Robotic Gynecologic Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients and How to Optimize Success. Menderes G; Gysler SM; Vadivelu N; Silasi DA Curr Pain Headache Rep; 2019 Jul; 23(7):51. PubMed ID: 31263977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Skills in minimally invasive and open surgery show limited transferability to robotic surgery: results from a prospective study. Kowalewski KF; Schmidt MW; Proctor T; Pohl M; Wennberg E; Karadza E; Romero P; Kenngott HG; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1656-1667. PubMed ID: 29435749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Make New Friends But Keep the Old: Minimally Invasive Surgery Training in Gynecologic Oncology Fellowship Programs. Ring KL; Ramirez PT; Conrad LB; Burke W; Wendel Naumann R; Munsell MF; Frumovitz M Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1115-20. PubMed ID: 26067857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Same-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Surgery Performed by Gynecologic Oncologists: A Review of Patient Selection. Sanabria D; Rodriguez J; Pecci P; Ardila E; Pareja R J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):816-825. PubMed ID: 31715304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mortality Rates in Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Gynecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Behbehani S; Suarez-Salvador E; Buras M; Magtibay P; Magrina J J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):603-612.e1. PubMed ID: 31627007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS) Pilot Curriculum for robot assisted gynecological surgery. Rusch P; Kimmig R; Lecuru F; Persson J; Ponce J; Degueldre M; Verheijen R Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Feb; 297(2):415-420. PubMed ID: 29236172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robot-assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Cancers. Zanagnolo V; Garbi A; Achilarre MT; Minig L J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):379-396. PubMed ID: 28104497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Endoscopic surgery in Japan: The 13th national survey (2014-2015) by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery. Shiroshita H; Inomata M; Bandoh T; Uchida H; Akira S; Hashizume M; Yamaguchi S; Eguchi S; Wada N; Takiguchi S; Ieiri S; Endo S; Iwazaki M; Tamaki Y; Tabata M; Kanayama H; Mimata H; Hasegawa T; Onishi K; Yanaga K; Morikawa T; Terachi T; Matsumoto S; Yamashita Y; Kitano S; Watanabe M Asian J Endosc Surg; 2019 Jan; 12(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 30681279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]