268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36620447)
1. Age effects on cognitive functions and speech-in-noise processing: An event-related potential study with cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
Burkhardt P; Müller V; Meister H; Weglage A; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():1005859. PubMed ID: 36620447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.
Weglage A; Layer N; Meister H; Müller V; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The timecourse of multisensory speech processing in unilaterally stimulated cochlear implant users revealed by ERPs.
Layer N; Weglage A; Müller V; Meister H; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Murray MM; Sandmann P
Neuroimage Clin; 2022; 34():102982. PubMed ID: 35303598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Neural Correlates of Individual Differences in Speech-in-Noise Performance in a Large Cohort of Cochlear Implant Users.
Berger JI; Gander PE; Kim S; Schwalje AT; Woo J; Na YM; Holmes A; Hong JM; Dunn CC; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; McMurray B; Griffiths TD; Choi I
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1107-1120. PubMed ID: 37144890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrophysiological differences and similarities in audiovisual speech processing in CI users with unilateral and bilateral hearing loss.
Layer N; Weglage A; Müller V; Meister H; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Murray MM; Sandmann P
Curr Res Neurobiol; 2022; 3():100059. PubMed ID: 36405629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noise-Induced Change of Cortical Temporal Processing in Cochlear Implant Users.
Han JH; Lee J; Lee HJ
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 13(3):241-248. PubMed ID: 31902201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid: Objective Measures of Binaural Benefit.
Balkenhol T; Wallhäusser-Franke E; Rotter N; Servais JJ
Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():586119. PubMed ID: 33381008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aging Effects on Cortical Responses to Tones and Speech in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.
Xie Z; Stakhovskaya O; Goupell MJ; Anderson S
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 22(6):719-740. PubMed ID: 34231111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in Speech-Related Brain Activity During Adaptation to Electro-Acoustic Hearing.
Balkenhol T; Wallhäusser-Franke E; Rotter N; Servais JJ
Front Neurol; 2020; 11():161. PubMed ID: 32300327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cognitive factors contribute to speech perception in cochlear-implant users and age-matched normal-hearing listeners under vocoded conditions.
O'Neill ER; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):195. PubMed ID: 31370651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Side-of-Implantation Effect on Functional Asymmetry in the Auditory Cortex of Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear-Implant Users.
Weglage A; Müller V; Layer N; Abdel-Latif KHA; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
Brain Topogr; 2022 Jul; 35(4):431-452. PubMed ID: 35668310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of stimulus modality, task complexity, and cuing on working memory and the relationship with speech recognition in older cochlear implant users.
Luo X; Azuma T; Kolberg C; Pulling KR
J Commun Disord; 2022; 95():106170. PubMed ID: 34839068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined Brain-Perfusion SPECT and EEG Measurements Suggest Distinct Strategies for Speech Comprehension in CI Users With Higher and Lower Performance.
Kessler M; Schierholz I; Mamach M; Wilke F; Hahne A; Büchner A; Geworski L; Bengel FM; Sandmann P; Berding G
Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():787. PubMed ID: 32848560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Study of Event-Related Potentials During Monaural and Bilateral Hearing in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.
Voola M; Nguyen AT; Wedekind A; Marinovic W; Rajan G; Tavora-Vieira D
Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):842-853. PubMed ID: 36706105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How Does Nonverbal Reasoning Affect Sentence Recognition in Adults with Cochlear Implants and Normal-Hearing Peers?
Moberly AC; Mattingly JK; Castellanos I
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(3):127-138. PubMed ID: 31266013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spectral-Temporal Trade-Off in Vocoded Sentence Recognition: Effects of Age, Hearing Thresholds, and Working Memory.
Shader MJ; Yancey CM; Gordon-Salant S; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1226-1235. PubMed ID: 32032222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of aging on speech perception in noise: comparison between normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
Jin SH; Liu C; Sladen DP
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(7):656-65. PubMed ID: 25365368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
