These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36620713)

  • 1. Clinical Evaluation of the 3nethra Aberro Handheld Autorefractometer.
    Perumal S; Venkatramanan S; Rj V; T J; Adithya J; Abraham A; Cherian H
    J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2022; 17(4):536-542. PubMed ID: 36620713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Spot Vision Screener and Tabletop Autorefractometer with Retinoscopy in the Pediatric Population.
    Arslantürk Eren M; Nalcı Baytaroğlu H; Atilla H
    Turk J Ophthalmol; 2024 Apr; 54(2):56-62. PubMed ID: 38644780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study.
    Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study.
    Rao DP; Negiloni K; Gurunathan S; Velkumar S; Sivaraman A; Baig AU; Kumari B; Murali K
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):498. PubMed ID: 36536321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of a Simple-to-Use, Affordable, Portable Wavefront Aberrometry-Based Auto Refractometer in a Paediatric Population.
    Rao DP; Negiloni K; Gurunathan S; Velkumar S; Sivaraman A; Baig AU; B K; Murali K
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2022; 16():4281-4291. PubMed ID: 36578668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and reproducibility of a handheld videorefractor.
    Ogbuehi KC; Almaliki WH; AlQarni A; Osuagwu UL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):632-41. PubMed ID: 25822015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hand-Held Nidek versus Table-Mounted Huvitz Autorefractors and Their Agreement with Subjective Refraction in Adults.
    Sayed KM; Alsmman AH; Mostafa EM
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2021; 15():1391-1401. PubMed ID: 33833497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
    María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of patient visual comfort and repeatability of refractive values in non-presbyopic healthy eyes.
    Segura F; Sanchez-Cano A; Lopez de la Fuente C; Fuentes-Broto L; Pinilla I
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2015; 8(5):1031-6. PubMed ID: 26558222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of autorefraction in an adult Indian population.
    Kumar RS; Moe CA; Kumar D; Rackenchath MV; A V SD; Nagaraj S; Wittberg DM; Stamper RL; Keenan JD
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251583. PubMed ID: 34010350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Pentacam® AXL Wave provides a reliable wavefront-based objective refraction when compared to manifest subjective refraction: A prospective study.
    Balparda K; Acevedo-Urrego A; Silva-Quintero LA; Herrera-Chalarca T
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 70(5):1533-1537. PubMed ID: 35502018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Difference of refraction values between standard autorefractometry and Plusoptix.
    Bogdănici CM; Săndulache CM; Vasiliu R; Obadă O
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2016; 60(4):249-254. PubMed ID: 29450357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparison Between Refraction From an Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Clinical Refractions.
    Tabernero J; Otero C; Pardhan S
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 9(7):23. PubMed ID: 32832229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are the results of handheld auto-refractometer as valid as the result of table-mounted refractometer?
    Mirzajani A; Qasemi F; Asharlous A; Yekta A; Doostdar A; Khabazkhoob M; Hashemi H
    J Curr Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 31(3):305-311. PubMed ID: 31528766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparability of the Retinomax K-plus 3 handheld autorefractometer in quick mode versus on-table autorefractometer in standard mode.
    Castilla Martinez G; Tarazona Jaimes CP; Gutierrez Amoros C; Fernandez Nadal A; Romero Valero D; Escolano Serrano J; Monera Lucas CE; Martinez Toldos JJ
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed); 2023 Sep; 98(9):533-539. PubMed ID: 37595789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ametropia detection using a novel, compact wavefront autorefractor.
    Hernández CS; Gil A; Zaytouny A; Casares I; Poderoso J; de Lara A; Wehse A; Dave SR; Lim D; Lage E; Alejandre-Alba N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Mar; 44(2):311-320. PubMed ID: 38084770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement Accuracy When Using Spot Vision Screener With or Without Cycloplegia in Young Adults.
    Tatara S; Maeda F; Ubukata H; Shiga Y; Yaoeda K
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():3543-3548. PubMed ID: 38026593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
    Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the SVOne Handheld Autorefractor in a Pediatric Population.
    Rosenfield M; Ciuffreda KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 94(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 27668640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of the L80 autorefractometer.
    Shneor E; Millodot M; Avraham O; Amar S; Gordon-Shaag A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2012 Jan; 95(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 21933270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.