These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3662158)

  • 1. A radiographic comparison of prehospital cervical immobilization methods.
    Graziano AF; Scheidel EA; Cline JR; Baer LJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 1987 Oct; 16(10):1127-31. PubMed ID: 3662158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A practical radiographic comparison of short board technique and Kendrick Extrication Device.
    Howell JM; Burrow R; Dumontier C; Hillyard A
    Ann Emerg Med; 1989 Sep; 18(9):943-6. PubMed ID: 2764327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of methods of cervical immobilization used in patient extrication and transport.
    Cline JR; Scheidel E; Bigsby EF
    J Trauma; 1985 Jul; 25(7):649-53. PubMed ID: 4009770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emergency cervical-spine immobilization.
    Chandler DR; Nemejc C; Adkins RH; Waters RL
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Oct; 21(10):1185-8. PubMed ID: 1416294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical and radiological evaluation of Vertebrace extrication collars.
    Solot JA; Winzelberg GG
    J Emerg Med; 1990; 8(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 2351802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of three cervical immobilization devices.
    Hostler D; Colburn D; Seitz SR
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2009; 13(2):256-60. PubMed ID: 19291567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical spine stabilization in pediatric patients: evaluation of current techniques.
    Huerta C; Griffith R; Joyce SM
    Ann Emerg Med; 1987 Oct; 16(10):1121-6. PubMed ID: 3662157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of cervical spine immobilization methods.
    Podolsky S; Baraff LJ; Simon RR; Hoffman JR; Larmon B; Ablon W
    J Trauma; 1983 Jun; 23(6):461-5. PubMed ID: 6864837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a new cervical immobilization/extrication device.
    Joyce SM; Moser CS
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 1992; 7(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 10171177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in lung function after the use of 2 extrication systems: a randomized crossover trial.
    Rasal Carnicer M; Juguera Rodríguez L; Vela de Oro N; García Pérez AB; Pérez Alonso N; Pardo Ríos M
    Emergencias; 2018 Abr; 30(2):115-118. PubMed ID: 29547234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Kendrick extrication device used for pediatric spinal immobilization.
    Markenson D; Foltin G; Tunik M; Cooper A; Giordano L; Fitton A; Lanotte T
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 1999; 3(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 9921744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical Spine Motion During Vehicle Extrication of Healthy Volunteers.
    Gabrieli A; Nardello F; Geronazzo M; Marchetti P; Liberto A; Arcozzi D; Polati E; Cesari P; Zamparo P
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2020; 24(5):712-720. PubMed ID: 31750763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of prehospital cervical immobilization devices using video and electromyography.
    Manix T; Gunderson MR; Garth GC
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 1995; 10(4):232-7; discussion 237-8. PubMed ID: 10155435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid Extrication versus the Kendrick Extrication Device (KED): Comparison of Techniques Used After Motor Vehicle Collisions.
    Bucher J; Dos Santos F; Frazier D; Merlin MA
    West J Emerg Med; 2015 May; 16(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 25987929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Airway scope laryngoscopy under manual inline stabilization and cervical collar immobilization: a crossover in vivo cinefluoroscopic study.
    Aoi Y; Inagawa G; Hashimoto K; Tashima H; Tsuboi S; Takahata T; Nakamura K; Goto T
    J Trauma; 2011 Jul; 71(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 20805775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confirmation of suboptimal protocols in spinal immobilisation?
    Dixon M; O'Halloran J; Hannigan A; Keenan S; Cummins NM
    Emerg Med J; 2015 Dec; 32(12):939-45. PubMed ID: 26362582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Review of existing measurement tools to assess spinal motion during prehospital immobilization.
    Weerts JON; Schier L; Schmidt H; Kreinest M
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2018 Jun; 25(3):161-168. PubMed ID: 28471789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pressure ulcers, indentation marks and pain from cervical spine immobilization with extrication collars and headblocks: An observational study.
    Ham WH; Schoonhoven L; Schuurmans MJ; Leenen LP
    Injury; 2016 Sep; 47(9):1924-31. PubMed ID: 27158006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the effectiveness of different cervical immobilization collars.
    McCabe JB; Nolan DJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 1986 Jan; 15(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 3942357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two new immobilization collars.
    Rosen PB; McSwain NE; Arata M; Stahl S; Mercer D
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Oct; 21(10):1189-95. PubMed ID: 1416295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.